Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunct to Resective and Regenerative Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Prospective Cohort of 72 Patients Followed for 18 Months.
Volkan Arısan, Alper Sağlanmak, Ata Anıl, S Volkan Arıcı, Anton Sculean
{"title":"Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunct to Resective and Regenerative Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Prospective Cohort of 72 Patients Followed for 18 Months.","authors":"Volkan Arısan, Alper Sağlanmak, Ata Anıl, S Volkan Arıcı, Anton Sculean","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct to resective and regenerative surgical peri-implantitis treatment (open flap debridement via scaling and smoothening of the implant surface [implantoplasty]) combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in a patient cohort of a university clinic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients were treated with either conventional therapy (CON) or conventional therapy plus PDT. CON included mechanical debridement, implantoplasty, and GBR. Clinical parameters, including marginal bone level (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome was the resolution of the infection using a composite success criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 18 months, infection resolution rates were 75% for CON and 80% for PDT groups (p = 0.75). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference for the infection resolution between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.6221). Both groups demonstrated statistically significant MBL gain after 6 months (mean 2.59 mm ± 1.25), with no statistically significant differences between groups throughout the follow-up. PPD was statistically significantly lower in the PDT group (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.018). BOP scores decreased initially but showed an increasing trend in both groups over time (chi-squared test, p = 0.045), with no statistically significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PDT as an adjunct to conventional peri-implantitis treatment with GBR resulted in statistically significantly lower PPD values. However, no additional benefits were observed for infection resolution, maintenance of infection-free status, MBL or BOP. Initial improvements in both groups followed by gradual recurrences in clinical parameters over 18 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"23 ","pages":"305-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct to resective and regenerative surgical peri-implantitis treatment (open flap debridement via scaling and smoothening of the implant surface [implantoplasty]) combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in a patient cohort of a university clinic.
Materials and methods: Seventy-two patients were treated with either conventional therapy (CON) or conventional therapy plus PDT. CON included mechanical debridement, implantoplasty, and GBR. Clinical parameters, including marginal bone level (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome was the resolution of the infection using a composite success criterion.
Results: After 18 months, infection resolution rates were 75% for CON and 80% for PDT groups (p = 0.75). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference for the infection resolution between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.6221). Both groups demonstrated statistically significant MBL gain after 6 months (mean 2.59 mm ± 1.25), with no statistically significant differences between groups throughout the follow-up. PPD was statistically significantly lower in the PDT group (two-way ANOVA, p = 0.018). BOP scores decreased initially but showed an increasing trend in both groups over time (chi-squared test, p = 0.045), with no statistically significant differences between groups.
Conclusion: PDT as an adjunct to conventional peri-implantitis treatment with GBR resulted in statistically significantly lower PPD values. However, no additional benefits were observed for infection resolution, maintenance of infection-free status, MBL or BOP. Initial improvements in both groups followed by gradual recurrences in clinical parameters over 18 months.
期刊介绍:
Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.