Menopause and work performance: a systematic review of observational studies.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sasha Taylor, Brooke Callahan, Julia Grant, Rakibul M Islam, Susan R Davis
{"title":"Menopause and work performance: a systematic review of observational studies.","authors":"Sasha Taylor, Brooke Callahan, Julia Grant, Rakibul M Islam, Susan R Davis","doi":"10.1097/GME.0000000000002557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Most Australian women will experience menopause while in paid employment, and many workplaces are introducing menopause-related policies. However, the quality of the evidence for the impact of menopause on women's work outcomes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the published literature that has examined the impact of menopausal status and symptoms on work ability and productivity.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A systematic review of English-language peer-reviewed literature. Data sources included Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus databases searched from inception to 14 November 2024, Google Scholar, and reference lists of included articles. Eligible studies included a formal process to identify menopausal status; a robust questionnaire or validated tool for assessing menopausal symptoms; a comparator group by menopausal status, symptom presence or severity; assessment of work outcomes by a validated tool; and a sample size of at least 100 women. Two authors selected the articles for inclusion and extracted the data from the included studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the modified Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for cohort studies and the modified Hoy tool for cross-sectional studies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 40 articles retrieved for full-text review, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies were cross-sectional and one was longitudinal. Menopausal status was not consistently related to work ability. The presence and severity of VMS and other menopause-related symptoms may impact work outcomes, but findings were mixed. A number of adverse employment, socioeconomic, and personal factors were independently associated with lower self-reported work ability in studies that examined such factors. Each included study was limited by a high risk of bias in at least one assessed domain, and only 6 of the studies adjusted for confounders. Heterogeneity in study design and analysis precluded a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Menopausal status alone was not consistently associated with work outcomes. Evidence for an adverse impact of menopausal symptoms on work ability is mixed and may be confounded by other factors impacting on women's work outcomes at midlife. Rigorously designed studies that assess the potential factors impacting work ability in midlife women are needed to ensure robust evidence underpins menopause-related workplace policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18435,"journal":{"name":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","volume":" ","pages":"769-778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Most Australian women will experience menopause while in paid employment, and many workplaces are introducing menopause-related policies. However, the quality of the evidence for the impact of menopause on women's work outcomes is unclear.

Objective: To systematically review the published literature that has examined the impact of menopausal status and symptoms on work ability and productivity.

Evidence review: A systematic review of English-language peer-reviewed literature. Data sources included Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus databases searched from inception to 14 November 2024, Google Scholar, and reference lists of included articles. Eligible studies included a formal process to identify menopausal status; a robust questionnaire or validated tool for assessing menopausal symptoms; a comparator group by menopausal status, symptom presence or severity; assessment of work outcomes by a validated tool; and a sample size of at least 100 women. Two authors selected the articles for inclusion and extracted the data from the included studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the modified Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for cohort studies and the modified Hoy tool for cross-sectional studies.

Findings: Of the 40 articles retrieved for full-text review, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies were cross-sectional and one was longitudinal. Menopausal status was not consistently related to work ability. The presence and severity of VMS and other menopause-related symptoms may impact work outcomes, but findings were mixed. A number of adverse employment, socioeconomic, and personal factors were independently associated with lower self-reported work ability in studies that examined such factors. Each included study was limited by a high risk of bias in at least one assessed domain, and only 6 of the studies adjusted for confounders. Heterogeneity in study design and analysis precluded a meta-analysis.

Conclusions and relevance: Menopausal status alone was not consistently associated with work outcomes. Evidence for an adverse impact of menopausal symptoms on work ability is mixed and may be confounded by other factors impacting on women's work outcomes at midlife. Rigorously designed studies that assess the potential factors impacting work ability in midlife women are needed to ensure robust evidence underpins menopause-related workplace policies.

更年期与工作表现:观察性研究的系统回顾。
重要性:大多数澳大利亚女性在从事有偿工作时都会经历更年期,许多工作场所都出台了与更年期相关的政策。然而,更年期对女性工作结果影响的证据质量尚不清楚。目的:系统地回顾已发表的关于绝经状态和症状对工作能力和生产力影响的文献。证据回顾:对英语同行评议文献的系统回顾。数据来源包括Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL和Scopus数据库,检索时间从成立到2024年11月14日,谷歌Scholar,以及纳入文章的参考文献列表。符合条件的研究包括确定绝经状态的正式程序;评估绝经期症状的可靠问卷或有效工具;对照组按绝经状态、症状存在或严重程度;用有效的工具评估工作成果;样本至少有100名女性。两位作者选择纳入的文章,并从纳入的研究中提取数据。偏倚风险的评估使用修改后的乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单进行队列研究,修改后的Hoy工具进行横断面研究。结果:在检索的40篇全文综述中,有10篇符合纳入标准。9项研究是横断面研究,1项是纵向研究。绝经状态与工作能力的关系并不一致。VMS和其他更年期相关症状的存在和严重程度可能影响工作结果,但研究结果好坏参半。在调查这些因素的研究中,许多不利的就业、社会经济和个人因素与较低的自我报告工作能力独立相关。每项纳入的研究都受到至少一个评估领域的高偏倚风险的限制,只有6项研究对混杂因素进行了调整。研究设计和分析的异质性妨碍了meta分析。结论和相关性:绝经状态本身并不总是与工作结果相关。更年期症状对工作能力不利影响的证据好坏参半,可能与影响妇女中年工作成果的其他因素相混淆。需要设计严谨的研究来评估影响中年妇女工作能力的潜在因素,以确保有力的证据支持与更年期相关的工作场所政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Menopause, published monthly, provides a forum for new research, applied basic science, and clinical guidelines on all aspects of menopause. The scope and usefulness of the journal extend beyond gynecology, encompassing many varied biomedical areas, including internal medicine, family practice, medical subspecialties such as cardiology and geriatrics, epidemiology, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and pharmacology. This forum is essential to help integrate these areas, highlight needs for future research, and enhance health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信