Methodological evaluation of ultrasound-guided modified traumatic catheterization in dogs with suspected urothelial carcinoma.

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jisu Lee, Ul Soo Choi, Minji Kwon, Hakyoung Yoon
{"title":"Methodological evaluation of ultrasound-guided modified traumatic catheterization in dogs with suspected urothelial carcinoma.","authors":"Jisu Lee, Ul Soo Choi, Minji Kwon, Hakyoung Yoon","doi":"10.4142/jvs.24308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Bladder tumors in dogs, particularly urothelial carcinoma (UC), pose a diagnostic challenge due to overlapping imaging features with benign conditions. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate treatment and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of a modified traumatic catheterization technique using a 4-hole catheter for cytological sampling in dogs with bladder masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen dogs with hematuria and mass-like bladder lesions identified using ultrasonography were included in the study. 15 dogs underwent modified traumatic catheterization using a four-hole catheter created by adding two extra holes to a 6 or 8 Fr feeding tube. The catheter was inserted into the bladder, and cells were aspirated from the lesion under ultrasound guidance. The procedure's efficacy was evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 15 cases achieved a 100% cell acquisition rate with high cellularity. The median visualization score was 3/3, the manipulation score was 3/3, and the cellularity score was 2/2. The average procedure time was 8.8 min. Diagnoses included 12 cases of UC and three cases of polypoid cystitis/urinary bladder polyps. No significant adverse effects, including bladder perforation or urethral trauma, were observed. Mild bleeding occurred in some cases but resolved spontaneously.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Modified traumatic catheterization using a 4-hole catheter is a safe, efficient, and minimally invasive technique for diagnosing UC and other bladder conditions. It is particularly useful for small-sized dogs and those unsuitable for invasive procedures. The enhanced catheter design improves lesion contact and sampling efficiency by offering a valuable tool for veterinary practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":17557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Science","volume":"26 3","pages":"e32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.24308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Bladder tumors in dogs, particularly urothelial carcinoma (UC), pose a diagnostic challenge due to overlapping imaging features with benign conditions. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate treatment and prognosis.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a modified traumatic catheterization technique using a 4-hole catheter for cytological sampling in dogs with bladder masses.

Methods: Fifteen dogs with hematuria and mass-like bladder lesions identified using ultrasonography were included in the study. 15 dogs underwent modified traumatic catheterization using a four-hole catheter created by adding two extra holes to a 6 or 8 Fr feeding tube. The catheter was inserted into the bladder, and cells were aspirated from the lesion under ultrasound guidance. The procedure's efficacy was evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results: All 15 cases achieved a 100% cell acquisition rate with high cellularity. The median visualization score was 3/3, the manipulation score was 3/3, and the cellularity score was 2/2. The average procedure time was 8.8 min. Diagnoses included 12 cases of UC and three cases of polypoid cystitis/urinary bladder polyps. No significant adverse effects, including bladder perforation or urethral trauma, were observed. Mild bleeding occurred in some cases but resolved spontaneously.

Conclusions and relevance: Modified traumatic catheterization using a 4-hole catheter is a safe, efficient, and minimally invasive technique for diagnosing UC and other bladder conditions. It is particularly useful for small-sized dogs and those unsuitable for invasive procedures. The enhanced catheter design improves lesion contact and sampling efficiency by offering a valuable tool for veterinary practitioners.

超声引导下改良外伤性置管对疑似尿路上皮癌犬的方法学评价。
重要性:犬膀胱肿瘤,特别是尿路上皮癌(UC),由于与良性疾病重叠的影像学特征,给诊断带来了挑战。准确的诊断对适当的治疗和预后至关重要。目的:评价一种改进的外伤性置管技术,采用四孔导尿管对膀胱肿物进行细胞学取样的有效性。方法:选取超声检查发现有血尿和膀胱肿块样病变的犬15只。15只狗接受了改良的创伤性导尿,使用四孔导管,在6或8孔的喂食管上增加两个孔。将导管插入膀胱,在超声引导下从病变处抽出细胞。从定量和定性两方面评价了手术的疗效。结果:15例细胞获得率100%,细胞分化程度高。可视化评分中位数为3/3,手法评分中位数为3/3,细胞性评分中位数为2/2。平均手术时间为8.8分钟。诊断包括12例UC和3例息肉样膀胱炎/膀胱息肉。没有观察到明显的不良反应,包括膀胱穿孔或尿道创伤。部分病例出现轻度出血,但自行消退。结论及意义:改良外伤性置管使用4孔导管是一种安全、有效、微创的诊断UC和其他膀胱疾病的技术。它对小型犬和不适合侵入性手术的犬特别有用。增强的导管设计提高了病变接触和采样效率,为兽医从业人员提供了一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Science
Journal of Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Science (J Vet Sci) is devoted to the advancement and dissemination of scientific knowledge concerning veterinary sciences and related academic disciplines. It is an international journal indexed in the Thomson Scientific Web of Science, SCI-EXPANDED, Sci Search, BIOSIS Previews, Biological Abstracts, Focus on: Veterinary Science & Medicine, Zoological Record, PubMed /MEDLINE, Index Medicus, Pubmed Central, CAB Abstracts / Index Veterinarius, EBSCO, AGRIS and AGRICOLA. This journal published in English by the Korean Society of Veterinary Science (KSVS) being distributed worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信