Multi-model assessments to characterize occurrences of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae).

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Kishan R Sambaraju, Kathryn A Powell, André Beaudoin
{"title":"Multi-model assessments to characterize occurrences of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae).","authors":"Kishan R Sambaraju, Kathryn A Powell, André Beaudoin","doi":"10.1093/jisesa/ieaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction and spread of nonindigenous species present a formidable threat to forest health. The emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis, is an East Asian-origin insect that has devastated ash (Fraxinus spp.) trees across the United States and parts of Canada since 2002. Proactive surveillance using high-performing predictive models could aid in mitigating pest risk. Predictor variables and modeling methods are important considerations in such analysis. Therefore, we assessed whether relevant single predictors, a combination of predictors grouped under a certain driver category, or multiple key predictors comprising several drivers, alter the goodness-of-fit of logistic regression models to EAB occurrence data (2002 to 2018) from Canada. The predictors used in models included spatial, topographic/positional, transport pathways/human hotspots, host-related factors, and climate-related variables. Using predictors from the best candidate logistic regression model, we tested the performance of 7 different model types including an ensemble model. Our findings showed that predictors from a wide range of drivers better characterized EAB occurrences than single predictors or a combination of predictors from any given driver category. In multi-model comparisons, random forest outperformed all other models, including the ensemble model. Elevation, infestation pressure, accumulated degree-days (>10 °C), and human population density were important predictors of EAB presence. Random forest and ensemble model forecasts for the city of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, indicated an area of potential concern for EAB. Our research strongly underscores the utility of comparative multi-model approaches in invasive risk assessments that could have important implications for pest surveillance and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Science","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaf032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and spread of nonindigenous species present a formidable threat to forest health. The emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis, is an East Asian-origin insect that has devastated ash (Fraxinus spp.) trees across the United States and parts of Canada since 2002. Proactive surveillance using high-performing predictive models could aid in mitigating pest risk. Predictor variables and modeling methods are important considerations in such analysis. Therefore, we assessed whether relevant single predictors, a combination of predictors grouped under a certain driver category, or multiple key predictors comprising several drivers, alter the goodness-of-fit of logistic regression models to EAB occurrence data (2002 to 2018) from Canada. The predictors used in models included spatial, topographic/positional, transport pathways/human hotspots, host-related factors, and climate-related variables. Using predictors from the best candidate logistic regression model, we tested the performance of 7 different model types including an ensemble model. Our findings showed that predictors from a wide range of drivers better characterized EAB occurrences than single predictors or a combination of predictors from any given driver category. In multi-model comparisons, random forest outperformed all other models, including the ensemble model. Elevation, infestation pressure, accumulated degree-days (>10 °C), and human population density were important predictors of EAB presence. Random forest and ensemble model forecasts for the city of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, indicated an area of potential concern for EAB. Our research strongly underscores the utility of comparative multi-model approaches in invasive risk assessments that could have important implications for pest surveillance and management.

多模型评估表征绿灰螟虫(鞘翅目:布氏科)的发生。
非本地物种的引进和传播对森林健康构成巨大威胁。翠绿灰螟(EAB), Agrilus planipennis,是一种起源于东亚的昆虫,自2002年以来,它已经摧毁了美国和加拿大部分地区的白蜡树(蜡属)。利用高性能预测模型进行主动监测有助于减轻虫害风险。在这种分析中,预测变量和建模方法是重要的考虑因素。因此,我们评估了相关的单一预测因子、某一驱动因素类别下的预测因子组合,或由多个驱动因素组成的多个关键预测因子,是否会改变对加拿大EAB发生数据(2002年至2018年)的logistic回归模型的拟合优度。模型中使用的预测因子包括空间、地形/位置、运输路径/人类热点、宿主相关因子和气候相关变量。使用最佳候选逻辑回归模型的预测因子,我们测试了包括集成模型在内的7种不同模型类型的性能。我们的研究结果表明,来自广泛驱动因素的预测因子比来自任何给定驱动因素类别的单一预测因子或组合预测因子更能表征EAB的发生。在多模型比较中,随机森林优于所有其他模型,包括集成模型。海拔、侵染压力、累积日数(bbb10°C)和人口密度是EAB存在的重要预测因子。加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿市的随机森林和集合模型预测表明了EAB的潜在关注区域。我们的研究强烈强调了比较多模型方法在入侵风险评估中的效用,这可能对有害生物的监测和管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Insect Science
Journal of Insect Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Insect Science was founded with support from the University of Arizona library in 2001 by Dr. Henry Hagedorn, who served as editor-in-chief until his death in January 2014. The Entomological Society of America was very pleased to add the Journal of Insect Science to its publishing portfolio in 2014. The fully open access journal publishes papers in all aspects of the biology of insects and other arthropods from the molecular to the ecological, and their agricultural and medical impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信