Discrepancy in Myocardial Responses to Pressure Overload versus Volume Load Lesions.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_72_24
Antoine Fakhry AbdelMassih, Fatma AlZahraa Mostafa Gomaa, Nermin Mouhareb, Nourine Diab, Rasha Helmy
{"title":"Discrepancy in Myocardial Responses to Pressure Overload versus Volume Load Lesions.","authors":"Antoine Fakhry AbdelMassih, Fatma AlZahraa Mostafa Gomaa, Nermin Mouhareb, Nourine Diab, Rasha Helmy","doi":"10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_72_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure and volume loads are vital components of every congenital heart disease. Numerous studies have concentrated on investigating myocardial remodeling under varying loading conditions in animal models. The objective of this study was to compare myocardial responses in lesions with volume overload, specifically ventricular septal defects (VSD), and lesions with pressure overload, such as coarctation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>For this purpose, three study groups have been involved: a VSD group (<i>n</i> = 19), a coarctation (CoA) group (<i>n</i> = 20), and healthy age- and sex-matched controls (<i>n</i> = 21). The severity of VSD has been measured by its size. In contrast, the severity of discrete CoA was quantified by the pressure gradient across the coarcted segment. The parasternal long axis assessed septal hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) dilatation-systolic myocardial LV velocities using tissue Doppler imaging. The global longitudinal strain was performed to assess LV function accurately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CoA groups displayed significant septal hypertrophy compared to the other two study groups: IVSd (CoA: 8 ± 1.6 vs. VSD 5.7 ± 0.9). LV dilatation was more marked in the VSD group: LV end-diastolic dimension (CoA: 30 ± 3 vs. 25 ± 1.7). Systolic septal and mitral annular velocities were reduced in the CoA group and intriguingly exaggerated in the VSD group: Septal basal systolic myocardial velocity: (VSD: 9 ± 2 vs. CoA: 5 ± 1 vs. Controls: 7 ± 0.8). Myocardial GLS was markedly reduced in the CoA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Besides the well-known eccentric-concentric hypertrophy paradigm in volume-pressure loading of the myocardium, pressure load seems to reduce myocardial velocities and LV function to a greater extent than volume loading. This is putatively mediated via myosin class switching, reduced myofilament sensitivity to calcium, and disrupted mechanical-electrical synchrony.</p>","PeriodicalId":15191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","volume":"35 1","pages":"50-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Echography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_72_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure and volume loads are vital components of every congenital heart disease. Numerous studies have concentrated on investigating myocardial remodeling under varying loading conditions in animal models. The objective of this study was to compare myocardial responses in lesions with volume overload, specifically ventricular septal defects (VSD), and lesions with pressure overload, such as coarctation.

Methodology: For this purpose, three study groups have been involved: a VSD group (n = 19), a coarctation (CoA) group (n = 20), and healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 21). The severity of VSD has been measured by its size. In contrast, the severity of discrete CoA was quantified by the pressure gradient across the coarcted segment. The parasternal long axis assessed septal hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) dilatation-systolic myocardial LV velocities using tissue Doppler imaging. The global longitudinal strain was performed to assess LV function accurately.

Results: The CoA groups displayed significant septal hypertrophy compared to the other two study groups: IVSd (CoA: 8 ± 1.6 vs. VSD 5.7 ± 0.9). LV dilatation was more marked in the VSD group: LV end-diastolic dimension (CoA: 30 ± 3 vs. 25 ± 1.7). Systolic septal and mitral annular velocities were reduced in the CoA group and intriguingly exaggerated in the VSD group: Septal basal systolic myocardial velocity: (VSD: 9 ± 2 vs. CoA: 5 ± 1 vs. Controls: 7 ± 0.8). Myocardial GLS was markedly reduced in the CoA group.

Conclusions: Besides the well-known eccentric-concentric hypertrophy paradigm in volume-pressure loading of the myocardium, pressure load seems to reduce myocardial velocities and LV function to a greater extent than volume loading. This is putatively mediated via myosin class switching, reduced myofilament sensitivity to calcium, and disrupted mechanical-electrical synchrony.

心肌对压力过载和容量负荷病变反应的差异。
背景:压力和容量负荷是每一种先天性心脏病的重要组成部分。许多研究都集中在动物模型中研究不同负荷条件下的心肌重构。本研究的目的是比较容量过载病变(特别是室间隔缺损(VSD))和压力过载病变(如缩窄)的心肌反应。方法学:为此目的,涉及三个研究组:VSD组(n = 19),缩窄(CoA)组(n = 20)和年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组(n = 21)。VSD的严重程度是通过其大小来衡量的。相反,离散CoA的严重程度是通过压缩段的压力梯度来量化的。胸骨旁长轴通过组织多普勒成像评估室间隔肥厚和左室扩张-收缩心肌左室速度。采用整体纵向应变法准确评估左室功能。结果:与其他两个研究组相比,CoA组表现出明显的室间隔肥大:IVSd组(CoA: 8±1.6 vs. VSD: 5.7±0.9)。VSD组左室扩张更明显:左室舒张末期尺寸(CoA: 30±3 vs 25±1.7)。CoA组收缩室间隔和二尖瓣环速度降低,而VSD组收缩室间隔基础收缩心肌速度升高(VSD: 9±2 vs. CoA: 5±1 vs.对照组:7±0.8)。CoA组心肌GLS明显降低。结论:除了众所周知的心肌体积-压力负荷的偏心-同心肥大模式外,压力负荷似乎比体积负荷更大程度地降低心肌速度和左室功能。据推测,这是通过肌球蛋白类转换、肌丝对钙的敏感性降低和机械-电同步中断介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography
Journal of Cardiovascular Echography CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信