{"title":"Effectiveness of Three Rotary File Systems on Enterococcus Faecalis in Single Rooted Teeth: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Roghith Kannan, Bassem Eid, Pooja Adtani, Tarek Elsewify, Ranya Elemam","doi":"10.14744/eej.2025.51423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of three rotary file systems on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilms in single-rooted teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 70 mandibular premolars were included in this study in which 60 root canals were inoculated with E. faecalis. The positive control group (n=5) received bacterial inoculation without mechanical preparation. The negative control group (n=5) was neither infected nor mechanically prepared. The teeth were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n=20 per-group) according to application of the rotary files: Group 1: XP-endo Rise Shaper (FKG, Le Crêt-du-Locle, Switzerland); Group 2: XP-endo Shaper (FKG, Le Crêt-du-Locle, Switzerland); Group 3: ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Sirona, Erlangen, Germany). Samples were collected using paper points before (S1) and after (S2) mechanical preparation. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were used to quantify bacterial loads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in bacterial counts were observed from S1 to S2 in all tested groups (p<0.001). Intergroup comparisons revealed no significant differences between the XP-endo Rise Shaper and XP-endo Shaper groups (p>0.05) and between XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Gold groups (p>0.05). Significant differences were observed between the XP-endo Rise Shaper and ProTaper Gold groups (p<0.05). The XP-endo Rise shaper group showed the largest reduction in bacterial loads (98.2%), followed by the XP-endo Shaper (96.0%) and ProTaper Gold (93.8%) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All tested rotary files were able to reduce bacteria but the novel single-file system (XP-endo Rise shaper) was superior in reducing bacterial load compared to XP-endo Shaper and the multiple file system (ProTaper Gold). (EEJ-2024-08-133).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 3","pages":"230-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.51423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of three rotary file systems on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilms in single-rooted teeth.
Methods: A total of 70 mandibular premolars were included in this study in which 60 root canals were inoculated with E. faecalis. The positive control group (n=5) received bacterial inoculation without mechanical preparation. The negative control group (n=5) was neither infected nor mechanically prepared. The teeth were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n=20 per-group) according to application of the rotary files: Group 1: XP-endo Rise Shaper (FKG, Le Crêt-du-Locle, Switzerland); Group 2: XP-endo Shaper (FKG, Le Crêt-du-Locle, Switzerland); Group 3: ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Sirona, Erlangen, Germany). Samples were collected using paper points before (S1) and after (S2) mechanical preparation. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were used to quantify bacterial loads.
Results: Significant differences in bacterial counts were observed from S1 to S2 in all tested groups (p<0.001). Intergroup comparisons revealed no significant differences between the XP-endo Rise Shaper and XP-endo Shaper groups (p>0.05) and between XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Gold groups (p>0.05). Significant differences were observed between the XP-endo Rise Shaper and ProTaper Gold groups (p<0.05). The XP-endo Rise shaper group showed the largest reduction in bacterial loads (98.2%), followed by the XP-endo Shaper (96.0%) and ProTaper Gold (93.8%) groups.
Conclusion: All tested rotary files were able to reduce bacteria but the novel single-file system (XP-endo Rise shaper) was superior in reducing bacterial load compared to XP-endo Shaper and the multiple file system (ProTaper Gold). (EEJ-2024-08-133).