A psychometric evaluation of the parent version of the children's revised impact of event scale (CRIES): screening for post-traumatic stress disorder in Dutch children aged 3 to 7 years.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Mia P Kösters, Eva Verlinden, Maj R Gigengack, Hans M Koot
{"title":"A psychometric evaluation of the parent version of the children's revised impact of event scale (CRIES): screening for post-traumatic stress disorder in Dutch children aged 3 to 7 years.","authors":"Mia P Kösters, Eva Verlinden, Maj R Gigengack, Hans M Koot","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07310-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the prevention and reduction of potentially harmful effects of childhood trauma, systematic screening for PTSD is a useful first step. Recently, the parent-reported versions of the widely used Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES-P13/8) were evaluated with promising results in children aged 8-18 years. The present study psychometrically evaluated these tools as screeners for PTSD in 96 very young children (3-7 years) in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In addition to the CRIES-P13/8, the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA) was administered to the parents of children exposed to trauma. Psychometric evaluation of the CRIES-P13/8 comprised structural validity, reliability, and criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bi-factor confirmatory factor analyses yielded generally poor fit, unidimensionality was established (≥ 0.87), internal consistency was sufficient (≥ 0.85). The demonstrated screening characteristics show that the CRIES-P13/8 differentiates reliably between children with and without (sub-threshold) PTSD as assessed by the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CRIES-P13/8 are adequate screeners, also in young children. In addition to the small number of items, this makes the CRIES-P13/8 a practical screener in the clinical and research setting. For each version, three cut-off scores are suggested, for full PTSD as well as subthreshold PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07310-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For the prevention and reduction of potentially harmful effects of childhood trauma, systematic screening for PTSD is a useful first step. Recently, the parent-reported versions of the widely used Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES-P13/8) were evaluated with promising results in children aged 8-18 years. The present study psychometrically evaluated these tools as screeners for PTSD in 96 very young children (3-7 years) in the Netherlands.

Methods: In addition to the CRIES-P13/8, the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA) was administered to the parents of children exposed to trauma. Psychometric evaluation of the CRIES-P13/8 comprised structural validity, reliability, and criterion validity.

Results: The bi-factor confirmatory factor analyses yielded generally poor fit, unidimensionality was established (≥ 0.87), internal consistency was sufficient (≥ 0.85). The demonstrated screening characteristics show that the CRIES-P13/8 differentiates reliably between children with and without (sub-threshold) PTSD as assessed by the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA).

Conclusions: The CRIES-P13/8 are adequate screeners, also in young children. In addition to the small number of items, this makes the CRIES-P13/8 a practical screener in the clinical and research setting. For each version, three cut-off scores are suggested, for full PTSD as well as subthreshold PTSD.

父母版儿童事件影响量表(哭声)的心理测量学评价:3 - 7岁荷兰儿童创伤后应激障碍筛查。
背景:为了预防和减少儿童创伤的潜在有害影响,对PTSD进行系统筛查是有用的第一步。最近,广泛使用的儿童事件影响修正量表(cry - p13 /8)的家长报告版本在8-18岁儿童中进行了评估,结果令人鼓舞。本研究对荷兰96名幼童(3-7岁)的PTSD筛查工具进行了心理测量学评估。方法:对创伤暴露儿童的家长,除采用CRIES-P13/8量表外,采用婴幼儿诊断性评估(DIPA)。CRIES-P13/8的心理测量评估包括结构效度、信度和标准效度。结果:双因素验证性因子分析的拟合度普遍较差,存在单维性(≥0.87),内部一致性足够(≥0.85)。所展示的筛查特征表明,哭声- p13 /8可靠地区分患有和没有(亚阈值)创伤后应激障碍的儿童(诊断婴儿和学前评估(DIPA))。结论:哭声- p13 /8是足够的筛查,也适用于幼儿。除了项目数量少之外,这使得ries - p13 /8在临床和研究环境中成为一种实用的筛选器。对于每个版本,建议三个截止分数,用于完全PTSD和阈下PTSD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信