Evaluation of Ultrasound‑Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.5812/aapm-157680
Moataz Salah Khalil, Michael Fayez Yousef Metias, Maged Salah Mohamed, Ahmed Abd Elmohsen Bedewy, Tarek I Ismail
{"title":"Evaluation of Ultrasound‑Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Moataz Salah Khalil, Michael Fayez Yousef Metias, Maged Salah Mohamed, Ahmed Abd Elmohsen Bedewy, Tarek I Ismail","doi":"10.5812/aapm-157680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many inter-fascial plane blocks, including the oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block and, more recently, the erector spinae plane (ESP) block, have been utilized as part of multimodal analgesia in numerous abdominal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of using the OSTAP block and the ESP block as components of a multimodal analgesic technique in individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical study was conducted on 50 individuals aged 20 to 60 years, of both genders, with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade I and II physical status, undergoing LC. Subjects were allocated using a computer-generated randomization table into two equal groups: Group A received an ultrasound (US)-guided ESP block, and group B received a US-guided OSTAP block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) at 6, 8, and 10 hours were significantly higher in the OSTAP block group compared to the ESP block group (P < 0.05). The time to the first morphine dose was significantly longer in the ESP block group compared to the OSTAP block group (P = 0.001). The total amount of morphine used was significantly greater in the OSTAP block group compared to the ESP block group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral US-guided ESP blocks provide superior and prolonged postoperative analgesia and require less morphine use compared to OSTAP blocks following LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"e157680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-157680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many inter-fascial plane blocks, including the oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) block and, more recently, the erector spinae plane (ESP) block, have been utilized as part of multimodal analgesia in numerous abdominal surgeries.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of using the OSTAP block and the ESP block as components of a multimodal analgesic technique in individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods: This randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical study was conducted on 50 individuals aged 20 to 60 years, of both genders, with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade I and II physical status, undergoing LC. Subjects were allocated using a computer-generated randomization table into two equal groups: Group A received an ultrasound (US)-guided ESP block, and group B received a US-guided OSTAP block.

Results: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) at 6, 8, and 10 hours were significantly higher in the OSTAP block group compared to the ESP block group (P < 0.05). The time to the first morphine dose was significantly longer in the ESP block group compared to the OSTAP block group (P = 0.001). The total amount of morphine used was significantly greater in the OSTAP block group compared to the ESP block group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions: Bilateral US-guided ESP blocks provide superior and prolonged postoperative analgesia and require less morphine use compared to OSTAP blocks following LC.

超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞与斜肋下斜腹平面阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的比较研究。
背景:许多筋膜间平面阻滞,包括斜肋下腹横平面(OSTAP)阻滞和最近的竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞,已被用作许多腹部手术中多模式镇痛的一部分。目的:本研究旨在评估OSTAP阻滞和ESP阻滞作为多模态镇痛技术对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者的影响。方法:随机、对照、单盲临床研究对50例年龄在20 ~ 60岁之间,男女均有,美国麻醉学会(ASA) I级和II级身体状态,行LC治疗。使用计算机生成的随机化表将受试者分为两组:a组接受超声(US)引导的ESP阻滞,B组接受US引导的OSTAP阻滞。结果:OSTAP阻断组6、8、10 h视觉模拟评分(VAS)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)明显高于ESP阻断组(P < 0.05)。与OSTAP阻断组相比,ESP阻断组到达第一次吗啡剂量的时间明显更长(P = 0.001)。与ESP阻断组相比,OSTAP阻断组吗啡总使用量显著增加。恶心和呕吐的发生率在两组之间没有显著差异。结论:与LC后的OSTAP阻滞相比,双侧us引导的ESP阻滞提供了更好和更长时间的术后镇痛,并且需要更少的吗啡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信