Vulnerability to Pollen-Related Asthma Hospital Admissions in the UK Biobank: A Case-Crossover Study

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Allergy Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1111/all.16612
Elaine Fuertes, Garyfallos Konstantinoudis, Diana van der Plaat, Adam Koczoski, Mikhail Sofiev, Paul Agnew, Lucy Neal, Debbie Jarvis
{"title":"Vulnerability to Pollen-Related Asthma Hospital Admissions in the UK Biobank: A Case-Crossover Study","authors":"Elaine Fuertes,&nbsp;Garyfallos Konstantinoudis,&nbsp;Diana van der Plaat,&nbsp;Adam Koczoski,&nbsp;Mikhail Sofiev,&nbsp;Paul Agnew,&nbsp;Lucy Neal,&nbsp;Debbie Jarvis","doi":"10.1111/all.16612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2023, a systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that outdoor pollen may affect asthma exacerbations in adults [<span>1</span>]. However, the authors cautioned that the literature is heterogenous and most studies are ecological and have not considered individual-level confounders or effect modifiers.</p><p>We here examined associations between daily concentrations of grass pollen, three tree pollens, and nettle pollen (represents weeds) assigned to home addresses using a deterministic model developed by the UK Met Office [<span>2</span>], and asthma hospital admissions among UK Biobank adult participants [<span>3</span>] from 2011 to 2022. Effect modification by demographic and environmental factors was examined.</p><p>Bidirectional adjusted time-stratified case-crossover models assessed associations between emergency asthma hospital admissions (493 ICD9 or J45/J46 ICD10 codes) and same-day pollen levels (high vs. low) [<span>2</span>] assigned to home addresses. Further information on data sources and the statistical analysis is in the Supporting Information.</p><p>Effect modification by daily mean NO<sub>2</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and ozone was examined (using tertiles), and models were stratified by annual average NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels, % greenspace, sex, age, ethnicity, BMI, smoking, education, income, deprivation (as defined in Table S1), and genetic risk for atopy, the latter as a marker for sensitization (Supporting Information).</p><p>There were 1893 asthma emergency hospital admissions (primary diagnosis, &gt; 14 days apart) among 1489 participants from January to September 2011–2022. Descriptive statistics for the pollen variables, study population, and confounders (i.e., meteorological and pollution variables) are provided in Table 1; Tables S1 and S2, respectively.</p><p>Asthma hospital admissions were higher on days of high alder and grass concentrations and when considering all pollen types together (Table 1). These findings remained fairly consistent when adjusting for air pollutants (Table S3), examining different lags (Table S4) and restricting to groups and time periods of interest (Table S5). Effect estimates for alder (but not birch) were also elevated when using a second pollen dataset for external validation (European pollen reanalysis, not available for the other pollen types, Table 1) [<span>4</span>]. The adverse association observed with high grass concentrations is in line with most existing literature, whereas that with alder has been reported in some but not all studies [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Associations for several pollens were notably stronger on days with high daily NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels (Figure 1), suggesting an acute interactive effect. This observation adds significantly to the currently weak evidence from epidemiological studies of pollution-pollen interactions, despite robust results from in vitro and experimental work [<span>5</span>].</p><p>For some pollens, higher but imprecise effect estimates were observed among those with a higher genetic risk of atopy, which supports biological plausibility (Figure S1), and among those of Non-White ethnicity (Figure S2), although sample sizes are small in these groups.</p><p>This work capitalizes on large individual-level health and demographic data which allowed important effect modifiers to be considered. However, we lacked objective measures of sensitization to pollen, residual confounding remains a concern (e.g., no information on medication, pollen avoidance behavior, fungal and other spores, and circulating viruses) and our findings may not be generalizable nationally as participants are clustered around recruitment sites.</p><p>We used a highly spatially and temporally resolved pollen dataset to assign six pollen exposures to participant home addresses [<span>2</span>]. This approach resolves the significant problem of the unknown representativeness of point observations. Previous evaluations of the pollen model predictions against the UK observations network show a good level of model skills [<span>2</span>]. Further developments to the pollen model are ongoing, including the production of a UK pollen reanalysis from present day back to 2000.</p><p>In conclusion, this analysis suggests exposure to grass and tree (alder) pollen can have serious health impacts for asthma patients, with effects being greatest on high air pollution days. This has important public health implications given that many asthma patients are sensitized and several pollen exposures are predicted to worsen with climate change [<span>6</span>].</p><p>E.F. and D.J.: conceptualization; E.F.: funding acquisition, visualization, writing – original draft; E.F., G.K., and D.P.: formal analysis; methodology; All authors: data curation, investigation, resources, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":122,"journal":{"name":"Allergy","volume":"80 7","pages":"2081-2083"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/all.16612","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.16612","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2023, a systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that outdoor pollen may affect asthma exacerbations in adults [1]. However, the authors cautioned that the literature is heterogenous and most studies are ecological and have not considered individual-level confounders or effect modifiers.

We here examined associations between daily concentrations of grass pollen, three tree pollens, and nettle pollen (represents weeds) assigned to home addresses using a deterministic model developed by the UK Met Office [2], and asthma hospital admissions among UK Biobank adult participants [3] from 2011 to 2022. Effect modification by demographic and environmental factors was examined.

Bidirectional adjusted time-stratified case-crossover models assessed associations between emergency asthma hospital admissions (493 ICD9 or J45/J46 ICD10 codes) and same-day pollen levels (high vs. low) [2] assigned to home addresses. Further information on data sources and the statistical analysis is in the Supporting Information.

Effect modification by daily mean NO2, PM2.5, and ozone was examined (using tertiles), and models were stratified by annual average NO2 and PM2.5 levels, % greenspace, sex, age, ethnicity, BMI, smoking, education, income, deprivation (as defined in Table S1), and genetic risk for atopy, the latter as a marker for sensitization (Supporting Information).

There were 1893 asthma emergency hospital admissions (primary diagnosis, > 14 days apart) among 1489 participants from January to September 2011–2022. Descriptive statistics for the pollen variables, study population, and confounders (i.e., meteorological and pollution variables) are provided in Table 1; Tables S1 and S2, respectively.

Asthma hospital admissions were higher on days of high alder and grass concentrations and when considering all pollen types together (Table 1). These findings remained fairly consistent when adjusting for air pollutants (Table S3), examining different lags (Table S4) and restricting to groups and time periods of interest (Table S5). Effect estimates for alder (but not birch) were also elevated when using a second pollen dataset for external validation (European pollen reanalysis, not available for the other pollen types, Table 1) [4]. The adverse association observed with high grass concentrations is in line with most existing literature, whereas that with alder has been reported in some but not all studies [1].

Associations for several pollens were notably stronger on days with high daily NO2 and PM2.5 levels (Figure 1), suggesting an acute interactive effect. This observation adds significantly to the currently weak evidence from epidemiological studies of pollution-pollen interactions, despite robust results from in vitro and experimental work [5].

For some pollens, higher but imprecise effect estimates were observed among those with a higher genetic risk of atopy, which supports biological plausibility (Figure S1), and among those of Non-White ethnicity (Figure S2), although sample sizes are small in these groups.

This work capitalizes on large individual-level health and demographic data which allowed important effect modifiers to be considered. However, we lacked objective measures of sensitization to pollen, residual confounding remains a concern (e.g., no information on medication, pollen avoidance behavior, fungal and other spores, and circulating viruses) and our findings may not be generalizable nationally as participants are clustered around recruitment sites.

We used a highly spatially and temporally resolved pollen dataset to assign six pollen exposures to participant home addresses [2]. This approach resolves the significant problem of the unknown representativeness of point observations. Previous evaluations of the pollen model predictions against the UK observations network show a good level of model skills [2]. Further developments to the pollen model are ongoing, including the production of a UK pollen reanalysis from present day back to 2000.

In conclusion, this analysis suggests exposure to grass and tree (alder) pollen can have serious health impacts for asthma patients, with effects being greatest on high air pollution days. This has important public health implications given that many asthma patients are sensitized and several pollen exposures are predicted to worsen with climate change [6].

E.F. and D.J.: conceptualization; E.F.: funding acquisition, visualization, writing – original draft; E.F., G.K., and D.P.: formal analysis; methodology; All authors: data curation, investigation, resources, writing – review and editing.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

英国生物库中与花粉相关的哮喘住院易感性:一项病例交叉研究
2023年,一项系统综述和荟萃分析得出结论,室外花粉可能会影响成人哮喘的恶化。然而,作者警告说,文献是异质的,大多数研究是生态的,没有考虑个人水平的混杂因素或效果修饰因素。在这里,我们使用英国气象局[2]开发的确定性模型,研究了分配给家庭住址的草花粉、三种树花粉和荨麻花粉(代表杂草)的每日浓度与2011年至2022年英国生物样本库成年参与者[3]哮喘住院率之间的关系。考察了人口因素和环境因素对效果的影响。双向调整的时间分层病例交叉模型评估了急诊哮喘住院(493 ICD9或J45/J46 ICD10代码)与分配给家庭住址的当日花粉水平(高与低)[2]之间的关系。关于数据来源和统计分析的进一步信息见辅助资料。通过每日平均NO2、PM2.5和臭氧对效果的修正进行了检验(使用ttiles),并根据年平均NO2和PM2.5水平、绿化面积百分比、性别、年龄、种族、BMI、吸烟、教育、收入、贫困(定义见表S1)和特应性遗传风险(后者是致敏的标志)对模型进行了分层。2011-2022年1月至9月,1489名参与者中有1893例哮喘急诊入院(初诊,间隔14天)。表1提供了花粉变量、研究种群和混杂因素(即气象变量和污染变量)的描述性统计;表S1和表S2分别为。在桤木和草花粉浓度高的日子里,以及综合考虑所有花粉类型时,哮喘住院率更高(表1)。在对空气污染物进行调整(表S3)、检查不同滞后(表S4)和限制于感兴趣的群体和时间段(表S5)后,这些发现仍然相当一致。当使用第二个花粉数据集进行外部验证(欧洲花粉再分析,不可用于其他花粉类型,表1)时,桤木(但不包括桦木)的效果估计也有所提高。高草浓度所观察到的不利关系与大多数现有文献一致,而桤木的不利关系在一些但不是所有的研究中都有报道[10]。在每日NO2和PM2.5水平较高的日子里,几种花粉的关联明显更强(图1),表明存在急性交互效应。这一观察结果大大增加了目前来自污染-花粉相互作用的流行病学研究的薄弱证据,尽管体外和实验工作得出了强有力的结果[10]。对于某些花粉,在具有较高的特应性遗传风险的人群中观察到更高但不精确的效应估计,这支持生物学上的合理性(图S1),以及在非白种人中(图S2),尽管这些群体的样本量很小。这项工作利用了大量的个人健康和人口数据,这些数据允许考虑重要的影响调节因素。然而,我们缺乏对花粉致敏性的客观测量,残留的混淆仍然是一个问题(例如,没有关于药物、花粉回避行为、真菌和其他孢子以及循环病毒的信息),我们的研究结果可能无法在全国推广,因为参与者聚集在招募地点附近。我们使用高度空间和时间分辨率的花粉数据集来分配6个花粉暴露到参与者的家庭住址[2]。该方法解决了点观测值代表性未知的重要问题。先前针对英国观测网络对花粉模型预测的评估表明,模型技能水平良好。花粉模型的进一步发展正在进行中,包括从现在到2000年英国花粉再分析的生产。总之,这一分析表明,接触草和树(桤木)花粉会对哮喘患者的健康产生严重影响,在空气污染严重的日子里影响最大。考虑到许多哮喘患者过敏,并且一些花粉暴露预计会随着气候变化而恶化,这对公共卫生具有重要意义。d.j.:概念化;e.f.:资金获取、可视化、撰写原创稿;e.f.、g.k.和d.p.:形式分析;方法;所有作者:数据管理,调查,资源,写作-审查和编辑。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Allergy
Allergy 医学-过敏
CiteScore
26.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
393
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Allergy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance, impact, and communicate all aspects of the discipline of Allergy/Immunology. It publishes original articles, reviews, position papers, guidelines, editorials, news and commentaries, letters to the editors, and correspondences. The journal accepts articles based on their scientific merit and quality. Allergy seeks to maintain contact between basic and clinical Allergy/Immunology and encourages contributions from contributors and readers from all countries. In addition to its publication, Allergy also provides abstracting and indexing information. Some of the databases that include Allergy abstracts are Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Disease, Academic Search Alumni Edition, AgBiotech News & Information, AGRICOLA Database, Biological Abstracts, PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset, and Global Health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信