Family and child characteristics in reading achievement milestones using machine-learning-based survival analysis

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Wonkyung Jang, Kwangman Ko, Seulki Ku, Kyong-Ah Kwon
{"title":"Family and child characteristics in reading achievement milestones using machine-learning-based survival analysis","authors":"Wonkyung Jang,&nbsp;Kwangman Ko,&nbsp;Seulki Ku,&nbsp;Kyong-Ah Kwon","doi":"10.1111/fare.13174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to identify early reading achievers and uncover family and child factors that mitigate reading skill disparities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Literacy standards guide educational policy to prevent literacy issues in at-risk children. Many studies lack accurate methods to measure reading milestones, relying on static approaches that miss dynamic longitudinal processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This study used machine-learning-based survival analysis on Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 (ECLS-K: 2011) data to analyze children's time to reach reading milestones, examining how family structure, socioeconomic status, gender, and behavioral problems relate to reading achievements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Being female, from a higher-income family, and not exhibiting behavioral problems increased the likelihood of surpassing reading milestones. Higher socioeconomic status had a stronger positive relation with reading achievement in two-parent families. Externalizing behaviors had a stronger negative relation with reading achievement in girls than boys. The survival tree analysis showed children from two-parent families with incomes at or above 200% of the poverty threshold reached reading milestones earlier. Among these children, those with lower externalizing behaviors achieved them the earliest.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study supports the family systems theory and the bioecological model, indicating family and child factors, and their interplay, relate to children's reading achievement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Machine-learning-based survival analysis enhances the assessment of reading milestones, facilitating early diagnosis, targeted interventions, and effective family policies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 3","pages":"1174-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to identify early reading achievers and uncover family and child factors that mitigate reading skill disparities.

Background

Literacy standards guide educational policy to prevent literacy issues in at-risk children. Many studies lack accurate methods to measure reading milestones, relying on static approaches that miss dynamic longitudinal processes.

Method

This study used machine-learning-based survival analysis on Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010–2011 (ECLS-K: 2011) data to analyze children's time to reach reading milestones, examining how family structure, socioeconomic status, gender, and behavioral problems relate to reading achievements.

Results

Being female, from a higher-income family, and not exhibiting behavioral problems increased the likelihood of surpassing reading milestones. Higher socioeconomic status had a stronger positive relation with reading achievement in two-parent families. Externalizing behaviors had a stronger negative relation with reading achievement in girls than boys. The survival tree analysis showed children from two-parent families with incomes at or above 200% of the poverty threshold reached reading milestones earlier. Among these children, those with lower externalizing behaviors achieved them the earliest.

Conclusion

This study supports the family systems theory and the bioecological model, indicating family and child factors, and their interplay, relate to children's reading achievement.

Implications

Machine-learning-based survival analysis enhances the assessment of reading milestones, facilitating early diagnosis, targeted interventions, and effective family policies.

使用基于机器学习的生存分析在阅读成就里程碑中的家庭和儿童特征
目的本研究旨在识别早期阅读成就者,并揭示减轻阅读技能差异的家庭和儿童因素。扫盲标准指导教育政策,以防止有识字风险的儿童出现识字问题。许多研究缺乏准确的方法来测量阅读里程碑,依赖于静态方法,而忽略了动态的纵向过程。方法采用基于机器学习的生存分析方法,对2010-2011年幼儿园班级幼儿纵向研究(ECLS-K: 2011)数据进行分析,分析儿童达到阅读里程碑的时间,考察家庭结构、社会经济地位、性别和行为问题与阅读成就的关系。结果:来自高收入家庭的女性,没有表现出行为问题,增加了超过阅读里程碑的可能性。双亲家庭中,较高的社会经济地位与阅读成绩有较强的正相关。外化行为对女生阅读成绩的负相关强于男生。生存树分析显示,收入达到或超过贫困线200%的双亲家庭的孩子更早达到阅读里程碑。在这些孩子中,外化行为较低的孩子实现这些目标的时间最早。结论本研究支持家庭系统理论和生物生态学模型,表明家庭和儿童因素及其相互作用与儿童阅读成绩有关。基于机器学习的生存分析增强了对阅读里程碑的评估,促进了早期诊断、有针对性的干预和有效的家庭政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信