Examining fairness in machine learning applied to support families: A case study of preventive services

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Eunhye Ahn, Yadi Tejeda, Yuanyuan Yang
{"title":"Examining fairness in machine learning applied to support families: A case study of preventive services","authors":"Eunhye Ahn,&nbsp;Yadi Tejeda,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Yang","doi":"10.1111/fare.13114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the fairness of a machine learning (ML) model designed to assess the need for home visiting services, focusing on its performance across family characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>ML models are increasingly used in family-centered services; however, their fairness remains underexplored, particularly concerning family sociodemographic factors and service contexts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study assessed the fairness of an ML model developed for home visiting services examining false negative rates (FNRs) across subgroups, particularly focusing on the intersection of maternal ethnicity and nativity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The ML model reduced FNRs from 52.9% to 22.1%, with the most notable improvements for children of Black mothers and with family characteristics associated with high risk. However, the model was less effective for children of Asian and foreign-born Hispanic mothers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although the ML model substantially reduced FNRs across various family subgroups, disparities were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding fairness in ML models requires a thoughtful approach, considering service context and impact on the families from diverse backgrounds. Continued research and collaboration are necessary for fair and inclusive use of ML models for family-centered services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 3","pages":"1285-1298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the fairness of a machine learning (ML) model designed to assess the need for home visiting services, focusing on its performance across family characteristics.

Background

ML models are increasingly used in family-centered services; however, their fairness remains underexplored, particularly concerning family sociodemographic factors and service contexts.

Methods

This study assessed the fairness of an ML model developed for home visiting services examining false negative rates (FNRs) across subgroups, particularly focusing on the intersection of maternal ethnicity and nativity.

Results

The ML model reduced FNRs from 52.9% to 22.1%, with the most notable improvements for children of Black mothers and with family characteristics associated with high risk. However, the model was less effective for children of Asian and foreign-born Hispanic mothers.

Conclusion

Although the ML model substantially reduced FNRs across various family subgroups, disparities were observed.

Implications

Understanding fairness in ML models requires a thoughtful approach, considering service context and impact on the families from diverse backgrounds. Continued research and collaboration are necessary for fair and inclusive use of ML models for family-centered services.

检查应用于支持家庭的机器学习中的公平性:预防服务的案例研究
目的评估用于评估家访服务需求的机器学习(ML)模型的公平性,重点关注其在家庭特征方面的表现。背景ML模型越来越多地用于以家庭为中心的服务;然而,它们的公平性仍未得到充分探讨,特别是在家庭、社会人口因素和服务环境方面。本研究评估了为家访服务开发的ML模型的公平性,该模型检查了不同亚组的假阴性率(FNRs),特别关注了母亲种族和出生的交集。结果ML模型将FNRs从52.9%降低到22.1%,其中黑人母亲和具有高风险家庭特征的儿童的FNRs改善最为显著。然而,这种模式对亚洲和外国出生的西班牙裔母亲的孩子效果较差。结论:尽管ML模型显著降低了不同家族亚组的FNRs,但也存在差异。理解ML模型中的公平性需要一个深思熟虑的方法,考虑到服务环境和对不同背景的家庭的影响。为了公平和包容地将机器学习模型用于以家庭为中心的服务,需要继续进行研究和合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信