{"title":"Examining fairness in machine learning applied to support families: A case study of preventive services","authors":"Eunhye Ahn, Yadi Tejeda, Yuanyuan Yang","doi":"10.1111/fare.13114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the fairness of a machine learning (ML) model designed to assess the need for home visiting services, focusing on its performance across family characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>ML models are increasingly used in family-centered services; however, their fairness remains underexplored, particularly concerning family sociodemographic factors and service contexts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study assessed the fairness of an ML model developed for home visiting services examining false negative rates (FNRs) across subgroups, particularly focusing on the intersection of maternal ethnicity and nativity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The ML model reduced FNRs from 52.9% to 22.1%, with the most notable improvements for children of Black mothers and with family characteristics associated with high risk. However, the model was less effective for children of Asian and foreign-born Hispanic mothers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although the ML model substantially reduced FNRs across various family subgroups, disparities were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding fairness in ML models requires a thoughtful approach, considering service context and impact on the families from diverse backgrounds. Continued research and collaboration are necessary for fair and inclusive use of ML models for family-centered services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 3","pages":"1285-1298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the fairness of a machine learning (ML) model designed to assess the need for home visiting services, focusing on its performance across family characteristics.
Background
ML models are increasingly used in family-centered services; however, their fairness remains underexplored, particularly concerning family sociodemographic factors and service contexts.
Methods
This study assessed the fairness of an ML model developed for home visiting services examining false negative rates (FNRs) across subgroups, particularly focusing on the intersection of maternal ethnicity and nativity.
Results
The ML model reduced FNRs from 52.9% to 22.1%, with the most notable improvements for children of Black mothers and with family characteristics associated with high risk. However, the model was less effective for children of Asian and foreign-born Hispanic mothers.
Conclusion
Although the ML model substantially reduced FNRs across various family subgroups, disparities were observed.
Implications
Understanding fairness in ML models requires a thoughtful approach, considering service context and impact on the families from diverse backgrounds. Continued research and collaboration are necessary for fair and inclusive use of ML models for family-centered services.
期刊介绍:
A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.