Agronomic responses of transitioning organic grain rotations employing multi-tactic tillage and cover cropping strategies

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Ravi Teja K. R. Neelipally, Arjun Chhetri, Debasish Saha, Song Cui, Sindhu Jagadamma
{"title":"Agronomic responses of transitioning organic grain rotations employing multi-tactic tillage and cover cropping strategies","authors":"Ravi Teja K. R. Neelipally,&nbsp;Arjun Chhetri,&nbsp;Debasish Saha,&nbsp;Song Cui,&nbsp;Sindhu Jagadamma","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The transition from conventional to organic farming presents challenges and opportunities for enhancing agricultural sustainability. This study evaluated the impacts of four organic grain cropping systems, varying in tillage, cover crops, fertility management, and rotational sequence, on cover crop biomass, grain yield, and weed suppression over a 3-year transition period. The cropping systems included (i) maximum yield system (MYS) for maximizing production; (ii) sustainable yield system (SYS) for balancing yield and ecological benefits; (iii) ecologically conscious system (ECS) for maximizing ecological benefits; and (iv) low input system (LIS) for sustaining the system without external fertility inputs. Implemented in a 3-year rotation of soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>), wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>), and corn (<i>Zea mays</i>), these treatments utilized a full-entry design with all three cash crop phases repeated annually. The MYS and SYS treatments achieved the highest cover crop biomass (7–12 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> Year<sup>−1</sup>) and weed suppression, while LIS had the lowest biomass (0–6 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> Year<sup>−1</sup>) and highest weed pressure. Fertilized treatments (MYS, SYS, and ECS) consistently produced satisfactory yields, with Year 3 averages of 4.66 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> for corn, 2.47 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> for full-season soybean, 4.06 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> for wheat, and 1.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> for double-crop soybeans. Also, agronomic outcomes (biomass and grain yield) of less-tilled SYS and ECS were on par with the most-tilled MYS system. Thus, this research highlights the potential for reducing tillage intensity in organic grain farming without compromising agronomic outcomes in the southeastern United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition from conventional to organic farming presents challenges and opportunities for enhancing agricultural sustainability. This study evaluated the impacts of four organic grain cropping systems, varying in tillage, cover crops, fertility management, and rotational sequence, on cover crop biomass, grain yield, and weed suppression over a 3-year transition period. The cropping systems included (i) maximum yield system (MYS) for maximizing production; (ii) sustainable yield system (SYS) for balancing yield and ecological benefits; (iii) ecologically conscious system (ECS) for maximizing ecological benefits; and (iv) low input system (LIS) for sustaining the system without external fertility inputs. Implemented in a 3-year rotation of soybean (Glycine max), wheat (Triticum aestivum), and corn (Zea mays), these treatments utilized a full-entry design with all three cash crop phases repeated annually. The MYS and SYS treatments achieved the highest cover crop biomass (7–12 Mg ha−1 Year−1) and weed suppression, while LIS had the lowest biomass (0–6 Mg ha−1 Year−1) and highest weed pressure. Fertilized treatments (MYS, SYS, and ECS) consistently produced satisfactory yields, with Year 3 averages of 4.66 Mg ha−1 for corn, 2.47 Mg ha−1 for full-season soybean, 4.06 Mg ha−1 for wheat, and 1.5 Mg ha−1 for double-crop soybeans. Also, agronomic outcomes (biomass and grain yield) of less-tilled SYS and ECS were on par with the most-tilled MYS system. Thus, this research highlights the potential for reducing tillage intensity in organic grain farming without compromising agronomic outcomes in the southeastern United States.

采用多策略耕作和覆盖种植策略过渡有机轮作的农艺响应
从传统农业到有机农业的转变为提高农业的可持续性带来了挑战和机遇。本研究评估了4种不同耕作方式、覆盖作物、肥力管理和轮作顺序的有机粮食种植制度在3年过渡期对覆盖作物生物量、粮食产量和杂草抑制的影响。种植制度包括(i)最大产量制度(MYS),以实现产量最大化;(ii)平衡产量与生态效益的可持续产量系统;(iii)最大化生态效益的生态意识系统;(iv)低投入系统(LIS),用于在没有外部肥力投入的情况下维持该系统。在大豆(Glycine max)、小麦(Triticum aestivum)和玉米(Zea mays)的3年轮作中,这些处理采用了全进入设计,所有三个经济作物阶段每年重复一次。MYS和SYS处理覆盖作物生物量最高(7 ~ 12 Mg ha−1年),杂草抑制效果最好,而LIS处理生物量最低(0 ~ 6 Mg ha−1年),杂草压力最大。施肥处理(MYS、SYS和ECS)持续产生令人满意的产量,第三年玉米平均产量为4.66 Mg ha - 1,全季大豆为2.47 Mg ha - 1,小麦为4.06 Mg ha - 1,双季大豆为1.5 Mg ha - 1。此外,较少耕作的SYS和ECS系统的农艺结果(生物量和粮食产量)与最多耕作的MYS系统相当。因此,这项研究强调了在不影响美国东南部农业成果的情况下减少有机粮食耕作的耕作强度的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信