Does Affiliation to Business Groups Moderate the Relation Between Dividend Policy and Creditors' Rights?

IF 1.8 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Geeta Singh
{"title":"Does Affiliation to Business Groups Moderate the Relation Between Dividend Policy and Creditors' Rights?","authors":"Geeta Singh","doi":"10.1002/pa.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines the impact of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 on dividend policy using a panel of Indian firms from 2010 to 2019 sourced from the Prowess IQ database. We find a significant decline in both the intensity and propensity of dividend payments post-IBC, consistent with the notion that firms reduce payouts to retain internal funds and reduce reliance on debt. However, this negative effect is less pronounced for business group-affiliated firms, especially those linked to India's Top 50 diversified business groups, suggesting more efficient internal capital markets and higher dividend capacity. Sub-sample analysis reveals that unlevered firms do not exhibit changes in dividend policy post-IBC, while levered firms do, confirming internal financing as a key mechanism. Further, we document a post-IBC decline in firm leverage, supporting a deleveraging trend. Our results remain robust to alternate dividend definitions and instrumental variable regressions addressing endogeneity concerns using the GMM framework.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 on dividend policy using a panel of Indian firms from 2010 to 2019 sourced from the Prowess IQ database. We find a significant decline in both the intensity and propensity of dividend payments post-IBC, consistent with the notion that firms reduce payouts to retain internal funds and reduce reliance on debt. However, this negative effect is less pronounced for business group-affiliated firms, especially those linked to India's Top 50 diversified business groups, suggesting more efficient internal capital markets and higher dividend capacity. Sub-sample analysis reveals that unlevered firms do not exhibit changes in dividend policy post-IBC, while levered firms do, confirming internal financing as a key mechanism. Further, we document a post-IBC decline in firm leverage, supporting a deleveraging trend. Our results remain robust to alternate dividend definitions and instrumental variable regressions addressing endogeneity concerns using the GMM framework.

企业集团关联度对股利政策与债权关系的调节作用?
本研究考察了2016年《破产和破产法》(IBC)对股息政策的影响,使用了2010年至2019年印度公司小组,该小组来自高超智商数据库。我们发现,在ibc之后,股息支付的强度和倾向都显著下降,这与企业减少派息以保留内部资金和减少对债务依赖的观点一致。然而,这种负面影响对商业集团附属公司不太明显,尤其是那些与印度前50大多元化商业集团有关的公司,这表明内部资本市场效率更高,股息能力更高。子样本分析显示,未杠杆化的公司在ibc后的股利政策没有变化,而杠杆化的公司则有变化,这证实了内部融资是一个关键机制。此外,我们记录了ibc后企业杠杆率的下降,支持去杠杆化趋势。我们的结果对于使用GMM框架解决内生性问题的替代股息定义和工具变量回归仍然稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信