Should Manufacturer Adopt Cross-Brand Trade-In Strategy in Cooperation With Recycling Platform?

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Bin Zheng, Sijie Li, Wenli Xiao
{"title":"Should Manufacturer Adopt Cross-Brand Trade-In Strategy in Cooperation With Recycling Platform?","authors":"Bin Zheng,&nbsp;Sijie Li,&nbsp;Wenli Xiao","doi":"10.1002/mde.4514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explores whether manufacturers should independently implement same-brand trade-ins or collaborate with recycling platforms for cross-brand trade-ins within a concurrent sale and resale framework. In the former strategy, trade-ins are restricted to manufacturers' branded products, while the latter imposes no such limitations. Our findings reveal that manufacturers prefer cross-brand trade-ins due to factors such as reduced market share, high collection costs, or product durability. Interestingly, manufacturers with sufficiently low market share benefit from cross-brand trade-ins, irrespective of collection costs. From a market perspective, same-brand trade-ins are advantageous when used-product durability is relatively high; otherwise, cross-brand trade-ins are more effective.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 5","pages":"2929-2944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores whether manufacturers should independently implement same-brand trade-ins or collaborate with recycling platforms for cross-brand trade-ins within a concurrent sale and resale framework. In the former strategy, trade-ins are restricted to manufacturers' branded products, while the latter imposes no such limitations. Our findings reveal that manufacturers prefer cross-brand trade-ins due to factors such as reduced market share, high collection costs, or product durability. Interestingly, manufacturers with sufficiently low market share benefit from cross-brand trade-ins, irrespective of collection costs. From a market perspective, same-brand trade-ins are advantageous when used-product durability is relatively high; otherwise, cross-brand trade-ins are more effective.

厂商与回收平台合作是否应采取跨品牌折价策略?
本研究探讨制造商是否应独立实施同品牌以旧换新,或在同时销售和转售的框架内与回收平台合作进行跨品牌以旧换新。在前一种策略中,以旧换新仅限于制造商的品牌产品,而在后一种策略中则没有这种限制。我们的研究结果表明,由于市场份额减少、收集成本高或产品耐用性等因素,制造商更倾向于跨品牌以旧换新。有趣的是,无论回收成本如何,市场份额足够低的制造商都能从跨品牌以旧换新中获益。从市场角度看,当二手产品耐久性较高时,同品牌以旧换新是有利的;否则,跨品牌以旧换新更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信