Computational Thinking and Academic Performance Across Different Instructional Modalities in Pre-University Courses: A Data-Driven Study

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jorge Parraga-Alava, Jorge Rodas-Silva
{"title":"Computational Thinking and Academic Performance Across Different Instructional Modalities in Pre-University Courses: A Data-Driven Study","authors":"Jorge Parraga-Alava,&nbsp;Jorge Rodas-Silva","doi":"10.1002/eng2.70203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In preuniversity education, educators and decision-makers need to understand how teaching methods affect student learning in computational thinking (CT). This helps identify factors influencing student outcomes and inform the development of personalized learning programs. In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of the academic performance of students enrolled in CT courses delivered through online (OL), blended (BL), and face-to-face (FTF) modalities in one public university in Ecuador. Our analysis focuses on preuniversity students during the academic year 2023. First, we collect data on student demographics and academic performance in each modality. Then, we applied statistical analysis to determine significant relationships between modalities. Next, we examine patterns and relationships between sociodemographic factors and academic results. Our results reveal that instructional modality has a significant impact on CT performance, with FTF students achieving better outcomes. Across all formats, admission scores and gender emerged as key predictors. While sociodemographic factors had greater influence in the FTF modality, academic factors played a more prominent role in BL and OL escenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":72922,"journal":{"name":"Engineering reports : open access","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.70203","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering reports : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In preuniversity education, educators and decision-makers need to understand how teaching methods affect student learning in computational thinking (CT). This helps identify factors influencing student outcomes and inform the development of personalized learning programs. In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of the academic performance of students enrolled in CT courses delivered through online (OL), blended (BL), and face-to-face (FTF) modalities in one public university in Ecuador. Our analysis focuses on preuniversity students during the academic year 2023. First, we collect data on student demographics and academic performance in each modality. Then, we applied statistical analysis to determine significant relationships between modalities. Next, we examine patterns and relationships between sociodemographic factors and academic results. Our results reveal that instructional modality has a significant impact on CT performance, with FTF students achieving better outcomes. Across all formats, admission scores and gender emerged as key predictors. While sociodemographic factors had greater influence in the FTF modality, academic factors played a more prominent role in BL and OL escenarios.

计算思维与大学预科课程中不同教学模式的学习成绩:一项数据驱动的研究
在大学预科教育中,教育者和决策者需要了解教学方法如何影响学生在计算思维(CT)方面的学习。这有助于确定影响学生成绩的因素,并为个性化学习计划的发展提供信息。在本文中,我们对厄瓜多尔一所公立大学通过在线(OL)、混合(BL)和面对面(FTF)方式学习CT课程的学生的学业表现进行了比较分析。我们的分析重点是2023学年的大学预科学生。首先,我们收集了每种模式下学生的人口统计数据和学习成绩。然后,我们应用统计分析来确定模式之间的显著关系。接下来,我们将研究社会人口因素与学业成绩之间的模式和关系。我们的研究结果表明,教学方式对CT表现有显著影响,FTF学生取得了更好的结果。在所有形式中,录取分数和性别成为关键的预测因素。社会人口因素对FTF模式的影响较大,而学术因素对BL和OL情景的影响更为突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信