Menghan Gao , Khai Ern Lee , Aida Soraya Shamsuddin
{"title":"Landscape approaches and stakeholder engagement in nature-based solutions for sustainable river floodplains: A systematic review","authors":"Menghan Gao , Khai Ern Lee , Aida Soraya Shamsuddin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based solutions have emerged as effective strategies for addressing environmental change and promoting sustainable development, with widespread applications in ecologically sensitive areas, such as river floodplains. This systematic review aims to elucidate the application of landscape-scale approaches in nature-based solutions and to emphasise the advantages of stakeholder participation. Following the PRISMA-SCR guidelines, this review analyses 35 selected studies published between 2014 and 2024, focusing on cases where both landscape approaches and stakeholder engagement were integrated into nature-based solutions. The findings reveal that stakeholder participation is lowest during the monitoring and implementation stages, with only 17.14% of the included studies mentioning involvement at this stage. Stakeholder participation is unevenly distributed across different categories, reflecting underlying conflicts of interest. The application of landscape approaches in nature-based solutions presents certain challenges; however, landscape metrics provide valuable data support, and hybrid landscape engineering is widely applied in practice. Remote sensing technologies offer greater potential for data acquisition and stakeholder engagement at the landscape scale. Nevertheless, cases integrating both landscape approaches and stakeholder engagement in river floodplains remain relatively rare, with only three studies identified. Based on the analysis of landscape approaches and stakeholder participation, this review proposes a sustainable governance framework for nature-based solutions in river floodplains, combining both landscape approaches and stakeholder involvement, thereby offering theoretical and practical guidance for future governance efforts in this field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 113686"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25006168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nature-based solutions have emerged as effective strategies for addressing environmental change and promoting sustainable development, with widespread applications in ecologically sensitive areas, such as river floodplains. This systematic review aims to elucidate the application of landscape-scale approaches in nature-based solutions and to emphasise the advantages of stakeholder participation. Following the PRISMA-SCR guidelines, this review analyses 35 selected studies published between 2014 and 2024, focusing on cases where both landscape approaches and stakeholder engagement were integrated into nature-based solutions. The findings reveal that stakeholder participation is lowest during the monitoring and implementation stages, with only 17.14% of the included studies mentioning involvement at this stage. Stakeholder participation is unevenly distributed across different categories, reflecting underlying conflicts of interest. The application of landscape approaches in nature-based solutions presents certain challenges; however, landscape metrics provide valuable data support, and hybrid landscape engineering is widely applied in practice. Remote sensing technologies offer greater potential for data acquisition and stakeholder engagement at the landscape scale. Nevertheless, cases integrating both landscape approaches and stakeholder engagement in river floodplains remain relatively rare, with only three studies identified. Based on the analysis of landscape approaches and stakeholder participation, this review proposes a sustainable governance framework for nature-based solutions in river floodplains, combining both landscape approaches and stakeholder involvement, thereby offering theoretical and practical guidance for future governance efforts in this field.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.