Henry K.C. Searle , Siddarth Raj , Ali Ridha , Imran Ahmed , Chetan Khatri , Andrew Metcalfe , Nick Smith
{"title":"The recovery trajectory of people undergoing treatment for knee articular cartilage damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Henry K.C. Searle , Siddarth Raj , Ali Ridha , Imran Ahmed , Chetan Khatri , Andrew Metcalfe , Nick Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.05.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knowledge of recovery trajectories helps interpret studies, manage patient expectations and plan future trials. The purpose of this review was to summarise the recovery trajectory of participants undergoing the main treatments of full-thickness knee articular cartilage defects: microfracture, scaffold-based repair, cell expansion therapy or non-operative treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The search included Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials until April 2024. The primary outcome measure was International Knee Documentation Centre (IKDC) scores over time. Standardised mean change (SMC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated to assess treatment response.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>46 studies were included. There were no non-operative studies. All participants demonstrated an improvement in IKDC scores from baseline. Pooled SMC scores for all arms were: 0.67 (95% CI −0.01 to 1.34) at 3 months, 1.39 (95% CI 0.84–1.93) at 6 months, 1.85 (95% CI 1.40–2.30) at 12 months, 1.99 (95% CI 1.55–2.42) at 24 months, 2.27 (95% CI 1.15–3.40) at 36 months, and 2.31 (95% CI 1.67–2.95) at 60 months. Participants undergoing each procedure demonstrated a plateau in IKDC scores at 24 months. Scores were maintained at 60 months for microfracture and cell expansion therapy. No data existed beyond 36 months for scaffold-based repair.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>All arms showed an improvement in IKDC scores from baseline up until 24 months before plateauing. This was maintained at 60 months for those undergoing microfracture and cell expansion therapy. More long-term data are needed for scaffold-based repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 211-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025001395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Knowledge of recovery trajectories helps interpret studies, manage patient expectations and plan future trials. The purpose of this review was to summarise the recovery trajectory of participants undergoing the main treatments of full-thickness knee articular cartilage defects: microfracture, scaffold-based repair, cell expansion therapy or non-operative treatment.
Methods
The search included Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials until April 2024. The primary outcome measure was International Knee Documentation Centre (IKDC) scores over time. Standardised mean change (SMC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated to assess treatment response.
Results
46 studies were included. There were no non-operative studies. All participants demonstrated an improvement in IKDC scores from baseline. Pooled SMC scores for all arms were: 0.67 (95% CI −0.01 to 1.34) at 3 months, 1.39 (95% CI 0.84–1.93) at 6 months, 1.85 (95% CI 1.40–2.30) at 12 months, 1.99 (95% CI 1.55–2.42) at 24 months, 2.27 (95% CI 1.15–3.40) at 36 months, and 2.31 (95% CI 1.67–2.95) at 60 months. Participants undergoing each procedure demonstrated a plateau in IKDC scores at 24 months. Scores were maintained at 60 months for microfracture and cell expansion therapy. No data existed beyond 36 months for scaffold-based repair.
Conclusion
All arms showed an improvement in IKDC scores from baseline up until 24 months before plateauing. This was maintained at 60 months for those undergoing microfracture and cell expansion therapy. More long-term data are needed for scaffold-based repair.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.