Estibaliz Maudes , Jesús Planagumà , Martin S Weber , Josep Dalmau
{"title":"Animal models of autoimmune encephalitis","authors":"Estibaliz Maudes , Jesús Planagumà , Martin S Weber , Josep Dalmau","doi":"10.1016/j.coi.2025.102579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose of the review</h3><div>To provide an overview of animal models and mechanisms of autoimmune encephalitides associated with autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens.</div></div><div><h3>Principal findings</h3><div>Currently, 18 encephalitides are known to be mediated by cell-surface autoantibodies, with 16 targeting neuronal proteins or receptors. These diseases, which can affect patients of all ages, are severe but usually respond to immunotherapy. They also serve as valuable models for studying how immune disruptions of neuronal proteins impair memory, behavior, cognition, or lead to psychosis, seizures, or abnormal movements. The process of modeling these diseases involves three steps: (1) demonstrating that patients’ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum alters the structure or function of the target antigen; (2) confirming that animal transfer of patient-derived CSF, serum IgG, or monoclonal antibodies replicates the molecular effects and disease symptoms; and (3) developing active immunization-based animal models. While passive transfer models are crucial for demonstrating the pathogenicity of patients’ autoantibodies, they have limitations in fully elucidating the neuro-immunobiology of these diseases (e.g. contribution of T-cells, microglia, native immunity, deep cervical lymph nodes). Additionally, these models fall short in evaluating the long-term clinical course and immunological therapies. Active immunization models, currently available only for anti-NMDAR encephalitis, overcome these limitations, capturing the acute and chronic disease course, introducing novel neuroimmunological paradigms, and enabling the assessment of treatment strategies beyond initial immunotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although animal models are inherently imperfect, current models of autoimmune encephalitides offer valuable neurobiological and immunological insights, facilitating the translation of experimental findings into clinical advancements.</div></div><div><h3>Key points</h3><div><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><div>Antibody-mediated encephalitides provide valuable models for studying how immune disruptions of neuronal proteins or receptors impair memory, behavior, cognition, or cause psychosis, seizures, or abnormal movements.</div></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><div>Modeling autoimmune encephalitides involves three steps: (1) assessing antibody effects on cultured neurons; (2) passively transferring human autoantibodies to animals to evaluate antigen-specific symptoms; and (3) inducing an autoimmune response in animals through immunization with full-length protein or peptide autoantigens.</div></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><div>Passive transfer models are essential for demonstrating autoantibody pathogenicity but are limited by a narrow symptom range, a short duration of effects, and the absence of other components of the immune response (e.g. inflammation, T-cells, microglia).</div></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><div>Active immunization models offer a comprehensive assessment of the neuro-immunobiology of these diseases, with a prolonged clinical course, enabling better evaluation of potential therapies.</div></span></li><li><span>5.</span><span><div>A characterized model of anti-NMDAR encephalitis provides comprehensive insights into the disease’s neurobiology, presenting an immunological framework that emphasizes the role of microglia and deep cervical lymph nodes in driving polyclonal immune expansion.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":11361,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Immunology","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102579"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095279152500055X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of the review
To provide an overview of animal models and mechanisms of autoimmune encephalitides associated with autoantibodies against neuronal surface antigens.
Principal findings
Currently, 18 encephalitides are known to be mediated by cell-surface autoantibodies, with 16 targeting neuronal proteins or receptors. These diseases, which can affect patients of all ages, are severe but usually respond to immunotherapy. They also serve as valuable models for studying how immune disruptions of neuronal proteins impair memory, behavior, cognition, or lead to psychosis, seizures, or abnormal movements. The process of modeling these diseases involves three steps: (1) demonstrating that patients’ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum alters the structure or function of the target antigen; (2) confirming that animal transfer of patient-derived CSF, serum IgG, or monoclonal antibodies replicates the molecular effects and disease symptoms; and (3) developing active immunization-based animal models. While passive transfer models are crucial for demonstrating the pathogenicity of patients’ autoantibodies, they have limitations in fully elucidating the neuro-immunobiology of these diseases (e.g. contribution of T-cells, microglia, native immunity, deep cervical lymph nodes). Additionally, these models fall short in evaluating the long-term clinical course and immunological therapies. Active immunization models, currently available only for anti-NMDAR encephalitis, overcome these limitations, capturing the acute and chronic disease course, introducing novel neuroimmunological paradigms, and enabling the assessment of treatment strategies beyond initial immunotherapy.
Conclusions
Although animal models are inherently imperfect, current models of autoimmune encephalitides offer valuable neurobiological and immunological insights, facilitating the translation of experimental findings into clinical advancements.
Key points
1.
Antibody-mediated encephalitides provide valuable models for studying how immune disruptions of neuronal proteins or receptors impair memory, behavior, cognition, or cause psychosis, seizures, or abnormal movements.
2.
Modeling autoimmune encephalitides involves three steps: (1) assessing antibody effects on cultured neurons; (2) passively transferring human autoantibodies to animals to evaluate antigen-specific symptoms; and (3) inducing an autoimmune response in animals through immunization with full-length protein or peptide autoantigens.
3.
Passive transfer models are essential for demonstrating autoantibody pathogenicity but are limited by a narrow symptom range, a short duration of effects, and the absence of other components of the immune response (e.g. inflammation, T-cells, microglia).
4.
Active immunization models offer a comprehensive assessment of the neuro-immunobiology of these diseases, with a prolonged clinical course, enabling better evaluation of potential therapies.
5.
A characterized model of anti-NMDAR encephalitis provides comprehensive insights into the disease’s neurobiology, presenting an immunological framework that emphasizes the role of microglia and deep cervical lymph nodes in driving polyclonal immune expansion.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Immunology aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed.
In Current Opinion in Immunology we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: 1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form. 2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
Current Opinion in Immunology will serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, lecturers, teachers, professionals, policy makers and students.
Current Opinion in Immunology builds on Elsevier''s reputation for excellence in scientific publishing and long-standing commitment to communicating reproducible biomedical research targeted at improving human health. It is a companion to the new Gold Open Access journal Current Research in Immunology and is part of the Current Opinion and Research(CO+RE) suite of journals. All CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy-of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach-to ensure they are a widely read resource that is integral to scientists'' workflow.