Effect of capsular sparing versus capsular resection on pressure changes under the tendon of the iliopsoas muscle: An experimental cadaveric study

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Michal Benes , Vladislav Bartak , Aneta Kirsbaumova , Mark M. Cullen , David Kachlik , Vojtech Kunc
{"title":"Effect of capsular sparing versus capsular resection on pressure changes under the tendon of the iliopsoas muscle: An experimental cadaveric study","authors":"Michal Benes ,&nbsp;Vladislav Bartak ,&nbsp;Aneta Kirsbaumova ,&nbsp;Mark M. Cullen ,&nbsp;David Kachlik ,&nbsp;Vojtech Kunc","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although several risk factors for iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty have been determined, limited data are available whether resection or preservation of the joint capsule affects the pressure underneath the iliopsoas tendon. Therefore, this study aims to test our hypothesis that capsular resection increases the pressure forced by the iliopsoas tendon at the iliopsoas notch.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten cadaveric hips were used for measuring the pressure changes under the iliopsoas tendon. First, measurements were taken in a neutral position of the hip with an increasing load applied onto the iliopsoas muscle (0–70 N). Second experiment was conducted at 10° of extension, 0°, and 30° of flexion, both with and without muscle load of 20 N. In both experiments, the pressure was tested in a capsule preserving setting, and then the same measurements were obtained after capsulectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Capsular resection increased mean subtendinous pressure in the neutral hip position (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). Significant differences were recorded with muscle load greater than 10 N (all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.02). At 10° of hip extension, the subtendinous pressure in hips with intact capsules differed significantly from those after capsulectomy, both with and without applied load (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). At 30° of hip flexion, significant difference was observed only between loaded and unloaded hips with capsulectomy (<em>P</em> = 0.0176).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>This study suggests that capsular resection during total hip arthroplasty alters the physiological pressures at the iliopsoas notch. Based on these findings, capsular sparing could decrease the risk of iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 106575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325001482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although several risk factors for iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty have been determined, limited data are available whether resection or preservation of the joint capsule affects the pressure underneath the iliopsoas tendon. Therefore, this study aims to test our hypothesis that capsular resection increases the pressure forced by the iliopsoas tendon at the iliopsoas notch.

Methods

Ten cadaveric hips were used for measuring the pressure changes under the iliopsoas tendon. First, measurements were taken in a neutral position of the hip with an increasing load applied onto the iliopsoas muscle (0–70 N). Second experiment was conducted at 10° of extension, 0°, and 30° of flexion, both with and without muscle load of 20 N. In both experiments, the pressure was tested in a capsule preserving setting, and then the same measurements were obtained after capsulectomy.

Findings

Capsular resection increased mean subtendinous pressure in the neutral hip position (P < 0.0001). Significant differences were recorded with muscle load greater than 10 N (all P < 0.02). At 10° of hip extension, the subtendinous pressure in hips with intact capsules differed significantly from those after capsulectomy, both with and without applied load (both P < 0.0001). At 30° of hip flexion, significant difference was observed only between loaded and unloaded hips with capsulectomy (P = 0.0176).

Interpretation

This study suggests that capsular resection during total hip arthroplasty alters the physiological pressures at the iliopsoas notch. Based on these findings, capsular sparing could decrease the risk of iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.
保留包膜与切除包膜对髂腰肌肌腱压力变化的影响:一项实验性尸体研究
虽然已经确定了全髋关节置换术后髂腰肌撞击的几个危险因素,但关于关节囊切除或保留是否影响髂腰肌肌腱下压力的数据有限。因此,本研究旨在验证我们的假设,即囊膜切除增加了髂腰肌肌腱在髂腰肌切迹处的压力。方法采用全髋体测量髂腰肌肌腱下压力的变化。首先,测量在髋关节的中性位置,增加髂腰肌的负荷(0-70 N)。第二个实验是在10°伸展,0°和30°屈曲,有和没有20 n肌肉负荷的情况下进行的。在两个实验中,压力都是在包膜保存环境中测试的,然后在包膜切除术后得到相同的测量结果。发现肩胛骨切除术增加了髋关节中立位的平均腱下压力(P <;0.0001)。肌肉负荷大于10 N时记录了显著差异(所有P <;0.02)。在髋关节伸展10°时,有和没有施加负荷的髋关节囊完整髋关节的肌腱下压力与囊切除术后的髋关节有显著差异(P <;0.0001)。在髋关节屈曲30°时,仅在囊切除术后负重和未负重髋关节之间观察到显著差异(P = 0.0176)。本研究提示全髋关节置换术中囊膜切除可改变髂腰肌切迹处的生理压力。基于这些发现,保留囊膜可以降低全髋关节置换术后髂腰肌撞击的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信