“Less paperwork and more practical approaches”: An exploration of stakeholder opinions and priorities for UK postgraduate medical ultrasound education

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
E. Skelton , R. Sharpe , M. Bartlett , C. O'Sullivan , G. Harrison
{"title":"“Less paperwork and more practical approaches”: An exploration of stakeholder opinions and priorities for UK postgraduate medical ultrasound education","authors":"E. Skelton ,&nbsp;R. Sharpe ,&nbsp;M. Bartlett ,&nbsp;C. O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;G. Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Training in medical ultrasound must adapt to the evolving needs of the healthcare landscape. This study aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of stakeholders’ current opinions and priorities for UK postgraduate medical ultrasound education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A UK-wide, online, anonymous survey was open to responses between 7th June and 15th July 2024. To ensure participant convenience, the survey questions were mainly designed as closed or priority ranking questions. Additionally, participants were given the opportunity to elaborate on their answers through free-text response options. Responses to closed questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and integrated within coding clusters generated through qualitative content analysis of free-text responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>89 valid responses were received, with an overall average completion rate of 64 %. The largest group of respondents were sonographers (n = 48), from a radiography background (n = 30). Most respondents held a CASE-accredited qualification in medical ultrasound (n = 66). Five coding clusters were developed during data analysis: 1) Teaching and academic assessment; 2) Clinical competency; 3) Educational content, delivery, and faculty structure; 4) Stakeholder development and, 5) Student experience. Key stakeholder priorities included high-quality teaching and standardised assessment processes, maintaining good working relationships between faculty and practice educators, and increased opportunities for professional development to support student learning and personal career advancement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although traditional lectures are regarded as core, increased integration of practical approaches, enabled by digital technology is needed to develop critical reasoning and real-world competency. Co-development of curricula with key stakeholders is essential to ensure relevance and suitability of course content and delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This study highlights important considerations for medical ultrasound education providers to support positive learning experiences for trainee sonographers whilst facilitating professional development opportunities for practice educators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 4","pages":"Article 102998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425001427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Training in medical ultrasound must adapt to the evolving needs of the healthcare landscape. This study aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of stakeholders’ current opinions and priorities for UK postgraduate medical ultrasound education.

Methods

A UK-wide, online, anonymous survey was open to responses between 7th June and 15th July 2024. To ensure participant convenience, the survey questions were mainly designed as closed or priority ranking questions. Additionally, participants were given the opportunity to elaborate on their answers through free-text response options. Responses to closed questions were analysed using descriptive statistics and integrated within coding clusters generated through qualitative content analysis of free-text responses.

Results

89 valid responses were received, with an overall average completion rate of 64 %. The largest group of respondents were sonographers (n = 48), from a radiography background (n = 30). Most respondents held a CASE-accredited qualification in medical ultrasound (n = 66). Five coding clusters were developed during data analysis: 1) Teaching and academic assessment; 2) Clinical competency; 3) Educational content, delivery, and faculty structure; 4) Stakeholder development and, 5) Student experience. Key stakeholder priorities included high-quality teaching and standardised assessment processes, maintaining good working relationships between faculty and practice educators, and increased opportunities for professional development to support student learning and personal career advancement.

Conclusion

Although traditional lectures are regarded as core, increased integration of practical approaches, enabled by digital technology is needed to develop critical reasoning and real-world competency. Co-development of curricula with key stakeholders is essential to ensure relevance and suitability of course content and delivery.

Implications for practice

This study highlights important considerations for medical ultrasound education providers to support positive learning experiences for trainee sonographers whilst facilitating professional development opportunities for practice educators.
“更少的文书工作和更实际的方法”:探讨利益相关者的意见和英国研究生医学超声教育的优先事项
医学超声培训必须适应医疗保健领域不断变化的需求。本研究旨在全面了解利益相关者目前对英国研究生医学超声教育的意见和优先事项。方法在2024年6月7日至7月15日期间进行了一项全英国范围的在线匿名调查。为了保证参与者的便利性,调查问题主要设计为封闭式或优先级排序问题。此外,参与者有机会通过自由文本回答选项详细说明他们的答案。使用描述性统计分析对封闭问题的回答,并将其整合到通过对自由文本回答的定性内容分析生成的编码簇中。结果共收到有效问卷89份,总体平均完成率为64%。最大的应答者群体是超声技师(n = 48),来自放射学背景(n = 30)。大多数受访者持有case认可的医学超声资格(n = 66)。在数据分析过程中,开发了五个编码聚类:1)教学和学术评估;2)临床胜任能力;3)教育内容、教学方式和师资结构;4)利益相关者发展和5)学生体验。主要利益相关者的优先事项包括高质量的教学和标准化的评估过程,维护教师和实践教育者之间的良好工作关系,以及增加专业发展的机会,以支持学生的学习和个人职业发展。虽然传统的讲座被认为是核心,但需要通过数字技术增加实践方法的整合,以培养批判性推理和现实世界的能力。与主要利益相关者共同开发课程对于确保课程内容和交付的相关性和适用性至关重要。本研究强调了医学超声教育提供者的重要考虑,以支持实习超声医师积极的学习经验,同时促进实践教育者的专业发展机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信