Bloqueo del plano serrato intercostal frente al bloqueo del cuadrado lumbar posterior en nefrectomía laparoscópica: estudio aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
M.T. Fernandez Martin , M.G. Matesanz , J. Andres , H. Muñoz , M.F. Muñoz , A. Fadrique , P. Castillo , P. Casas , S. Lopez
{"title":"Bloqueo del plano serrato intercostal frente al bloqueo del cuadrado lumbar posterior en nefrectomía laparoscópica: estudio aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego","authors":"M.T. Fernandez Martin ,&nbsp;M.G. Matesanz ,&nbsp;J. Andres ,&nbsp;H. Muñoz ,&nbsp;M.F. Muñoz ,&nbsp;A. Fadrique ,&nbsp;P. Castillo ,&nbsp;P. Casas ,&nbsp;S. Lopez","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2025.501728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Even though laparoscopic nephrectomy improves the quality of postoperative recovery, it still causes moderate to severe pain. Our objective was to determine whether serratus intercostal plane block (SIPB) was noninferior to posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in terms of pain control and quality of recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multicentre, controlled, randomized, blinded study had a sample size of 120 patients who were randomly assigned to SIPB, QLB, and control groups prior to scheduled laparoscopic nephrectomy. We collected the following variables: postoperative dynamic pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24<!--> <!-->hours, postoperative quality of recovery (QoR15), and total opioid consumption (fentanyl and morphine).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our results show that SIPB was non-inferior to QLB with regard to the primary endpoint (NRS 0.4/0.9) and quality of recovery (QoR15 112.7/106.85) (<em>P</em> .27). Opioid consumption (fentanyl <em>P</em> .37 and morphine <em>P</em> .9) was similar in the SIPB and QLB groups, and both groups were superior to controls in terms of intraoperative fentanyl consumption (<em>P</em> .001) and pain control (<em>P</em> &lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SIPB and QLB showed adequate postoperative pain control, good quality of recovery and lower fentanyl consumption, especially compared to the control group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":"72 6","pages":"Article 501728"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935625000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Even though laparoscopic nephrectomy improves the quality of postoperative recovery, it still causes moderate to severe pain. Our objective was to determine whether serratus intercostal plane block (SIPB) was noninferior to posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in terms of pain control and quality of recovery.

Methods

This multicentre, controlled, randomized, blinded study had a sample size of 120 patients who were randomly assigned to SIPB, QLB, and control groups prior to scheduled laparoscopic nephrectomy. We collected the following variables: postoperative dynamic pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours, postoperative quality of recovery (QoR15), and total opioid consumption (fentanyl and morphine).

Results

Our results show that SIPB was non-inferior to QLB with regard to the primary endpoint (NRS 0.4/0.9) and quality of recovery (QoR15 112.7/106.85) (P .27). Opioid consumption (fentanyl P .37 and morphine P .9) was similar in the SIPB and QLB groups, and both groups were superior to controls in terms of intraoperative fentanyl consumption (P .001) and pain control (P <.001).

Conclusions

SIPB and QLB showed adequate postoperative pain control, good quality of recovery and lower fentanyl consumption, especially compared to the control group.

Abstract Image

腹腔镜肾直肠切除术中肋间脊面阻塞与后腰方阻塞:随机对照双盲研究
尽管腹腔镜肾切除术提高了术后恢复的质量,但仍会引起中度至重度疼痛。我们的目的是确定在疼痛控制和恢复质量方面,锯肌肋间平面阻滞(SIPB)是否优于腰后方肌阻滞(QLB)。方法本研究是一项多中心、随机、盲法、对照研究,共纳入120例患者,随机分为腹腔镜肾切除术前SIPB组、QLB组和对照组。我们收集了以下变量:术后0、6、12和24小时的动态疼痛评分,术后恢复质量(QoR15)和阿片类药物总用量(芬太尼和吗啡)。结果SIPB在主要终点(NRS 0.4/0.9)和恢复质量(QoR15 112.7/106.85)方面均不低于QLB (P .27)。阿片类药物用量(芬太尼P .37,吗啡P .9)在SIPB组和QLB组中相似,两组在术中芬太尼用量(P .001)和疼痛控制(P < 001)方面均优于对照组。结论与对照组相比,ssipb和QLB术后疼痛控制良好,恢复质量好,芬太尼用量低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
113
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信