Unraveling the dual-acting effects of 2-cyclopenten-1-one (CCO): Yield increase and gaseous emission mitigation via microbial regulation

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Yaqun Li , Ruiyuan Lian , Wenyu Wang , Kun Zhang , Zhi Quan , Kai Liu , Jingyuan Li , Dongwei Li , Daijia Li , Lili Zhang , Jie Li
{"title":"Unraveling the dual-acting effects of 2-cyclopenten-1-one (CCO): Yield increase and gaseous emission mitigation via microbial regulation","authors":"Yaqun Li ,&nbsp;Ruiyuan Lian ,&nbsp;Wenyu Wang ,&nbsp;Kun Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhi Quan ,&nbsp;Kai Liu ,&nbsp;Jingyuan Li ,&nbsp;Dongwei Li ,&nbsp;Daijia Li ,&nbsp;Lili Zhang ,&nbsp;Jie Li","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional inhibitors, such as N-Butylthiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and 3,4-Dimethylpyrazol phosphate (DMPP), have been widely used to mitigate nitrogen loss, but their long-term environmental impacts remain a concern. Previous studies have indicated that 2-cyclopenten-1-one (CCO), a plant-derived compound, exhibits a dual-acting of suppressing urease activity and inhibiting nitrification. This unique property endows CCO with the potential to be developed into an eco-friendly and highly efficient novel inhibitor. In light of these findings, a field experiment was carried out to comprehensively assess the yield-increasing and emission-decreasing effects of this novel inhibitor and to explore the underlying microbial mechanisms. The experiment involved four treatments, each with three replicates: (i) Control (no fertilizer application); (ii) chemical fertilizer (NPK); (iii) NPK with NBPT and DMPP (NPK+ND), and (iv) NPK with CCO (NPK+CCO).</div><div>The results demonstrated that both CCO and ND treatments effectively increased yield and reduced emissions. Compared to NPK treatment, the CCO treatment significantly decreased NH<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 11.4 %, 9.9 %, and 12.8 %, respectively, and enhanced CH<sub>4</sub> uptake 27.32 g ha<sup>−1</sup>. Furthermore, the ND treatment efficiently regulated the relative abundance and structure of microbial communities associated with genes such as <em>amoB</em>, <em>nirS</em>, and <em>nisK</em>. In contrast, CCO treatment acted more specifically on genes like <em>norB</em> and <em>nirD</em>. CCO significantly impacted target microorganisms, including <em>Nocardioides</em> and <em>Nitrospira</em>, by elevating bacterial abundance and intensifying community competition. Consequently, soil microbial metabolism, especially denitrification, was inhibited, reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions and enhancing maize yields. These findings provide valuable insights for evaluating nutrient-retention mechanisms of novel inhibitors and strategies to mitigate the greenhouse effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106668"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional inhibitors, such as N-Butylthiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and 3,4-Dimethylpyrazol phosphate (DMPP), have been widely used to mitigate nitrogen loss, but their long-term environmental impacts remain a concern. Previous studies have indicated that 2-cyclopenten-1-one (CCO), a plant-derived compound, exhibits a dual-acting of suppressing urease activity and inhibiting nitrification. This unique property endows CCO with the potential to be developed into an eco-friendly and highly efficient novel inhibitor. In light of these findings, a field experiment was carried out to comprehensively assess the yield-increasing and emission-decreasing effects of this novel inhibitor and to explore the underlying microbial mechanisms. The experiment involved four treatments, each with three replicates: (i) Control (no fertilizer application); (ii) chemical fertilizer (NPK); (iii) NPK with NBPT and DMPP (NPK+ND), and (iv) NPK with CCO (NPK+CCO).
The results demonstrated that both CCO and ND treatments effectively increased yield and reduced emissions. Compared to NPK treatment, the CCO treatment significantly decreased NH3, N2O, and CO2 emissions by 11.4 %, 9.9 %, and 12.8 %, respectively, and enhanced CH4 uptake 27.32 g ha−1. Furthermore, the ND treatment efficiently regulated the relative abundance and structure of microbial communities associated with genes such as amoB, nirS, and nisK. In contrast, CCO treatment acted more specifically on genes like norB and nirD. CCO significantly impacted target microorganisms, including Nocardioides and Nitrospira, by elevating bacterial abundance and intensifying community competition. Consequently, soil microbial metabolism, especially denitrification, was inhibited, reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions and enhancing maize yields. These findings provide valuable insights for evaluating nutrient-retention mechanisms of novel inhibitors and strategies to mitigate the greenhouse effect.
揭示2-环戊烯-1- 1 (CCO)的双重作用效应:通过微生物调节提高产量和减少气体排放
传统的抑制剂,如n -丁基硫代磷三酰胺(NBPT)和3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸(DMPP),已被广泛用于减轻氮的损失,但它们对环境的长期影响仍然是一个问题。已有研究表明,2-环戊烯-1- 1 (CCO)是一种植物源化合物,具有抑制脲酶活性和抑制硝化作用的双重作用。这种独特的性质使CCO具有发展成为一种环保、高效的新型抑制剂的潜力。鉴于这些发现,进行了田间试验,以全面评估这种新型抑制剂的增产和减排效果,并探索潜在的微生物机制。试验包括4个处理,每个处理3个重复:(i)对照(不施肥);(ii)化学肥料;(iii) NPK与NBPT和DMPP (NPK+ND),以及(iv) NPK与CCO (NPK+CCO)。结果表明,CCO和ND处理均能有效提高产量和减少排放。与NPK处理相比,CCO处理显著降低了NH3、N2O和CO2排放量,分别降低了11.4 %、9.9 %和12.8 %,增加了CH4吸收率27.32 g ha−1。此外,ND处理有效地调节了与amoB、nirS和isk等基因相关的微生物群落的相对丰度和结构。相比之下,CCO处理更特异性地作用于norB和nind等基因。CCO通过提高细菌丰度和加剧群落竞争,显著影响目标微生物,包括诺卡伊德和硝化螺旋菌。因此,抑制土壤微生物代谢,特别是反硝化作用,减少温室气体排放,提高玉米产量。这些发现为评估新型抑制剂的营养保留机制和减轻温室效应的策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信