{"title":"Response of soil phosphorus fractions and microbial community network to straw returning: Insights from microbial phosphorus limitation","authors":"Xuelian Wang, Xinjie Ji, Anran Long, Jingwen Yang, Liyun Chang, Xiangwei Gong, Ying Jiang, Hua Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil microbial metabolism is usually limited by nutrients in agricultural ecosystems; however, the mechanism through which straw return determines microbial nutrient limitations by affecting soil phosphorus (P) fractions and microbial community networks remains unclear. We investigated the effects of no-tillage with straw return (NTS), plow tillage with straw return (PTS), rotary tillage with straw return (RTS), and conventional tillage (CT) without straw return (control) on soil microbial structure, co-occurrence networks, and assembly processes in Northeast China in 2023–2024. All soil microorganisms in the four treatments were subjected to P limitation, and compared with CT, the three straw returning practices significantly alleviated microbial P limitation to a certain extent. Straw returning promoted organic P mineralization and improved P availability by regulating P fractions, as shown by the increased inorganic P content of the NTS, PTS, and RTS treatments of 41.54 %, 6.25 % and 6.80 %, respectively (averaged across rhizosphere and bulk soil, and two years). Random forest and correlation analyses showed that NaHCO<sub>3</sub>–Po had a more significant response to P limitation. Straw returning practices did not change the soil bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere and bulk soil but decreased the fungal diversity through microbial high-throughput sequencing. Straw return-sensitive ASVs (rsASVs) was selectively aggregated in different modules, and straw returning induced specific responses in taxa/modules of microbial co–occurrence networks in the rhizosphere and bulk soil. Partial least squares path modeling found that, compared with fungi, changes in the bacterial community structure driven by straw returning crucially alleviated microbial P limitation. Overall, our results highlight the close relationship between microbial community structure and metabolic limitations and provide a theoretical basis for the application of straw returning in agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106698"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil microbial metabolism is usually limited by nutrients in agricultural ecosystems; however, the mechanism through which straw return determines microbial nutrient limitations by affecting soil phosphorus (P) fractions and microbial community networks remains unclear. We investigated the effects of no-tillage with straw return (NTS), plow tillage with straw return (PTS), rotary tillage with straw return (RTS), and conventional tillage (CT) without straw return (control) on soil microbial structure, co-occurrence networks, and assembly processes in Northeast China in 2023–2024. All soil microorganisms in the four treatments were subjected to P limitation, and compared with CT, the three straw returning practices significantly alleviated microbial P limitation to a certain extent. Straw returning promoted organic P mineralization and improved P availability by regulating P fractions, as shown by the increased inorganic P content of the NTS, PTS, and RTS treatments of 41.54 %, 6.25 % and 6.80 %, respectively (averaged across rhizosphere and bulk soil, and two years). Random forest and correlation analyses showed that NaHCO3–Po had a more significant response to P limitation. Straw returning practices did not change the soil bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere and bulk soil but decreased the fungal diversity through microbial high-throughput sequencing. Straw return-sensitive ASVs (rsASVs) was selectively aggregated in different modules, and straw returning induced specific responses in taxa/modules of microbial co–occurrence networks in the rhizosphere and bulk soil. Partial least squares path modeling found that, compared with fungi, changes in the bacterial community structure driven by straw returning crucially alleviated microbial P limitation. Overall, our results highlight the close relationship between microbial community structure and metabolic limitations and provide a theoretical basis for the application of straw returning in agriculture.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.