Response of soil phosphorus fractions and microbial community network to straw returning: Insights from microbial phosphorus limitation

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Xuelian Wang, Xinjie Ji, Anran Long, Jingwen Yang, Liyun Chang, Xiangwei Gong, Ying Jiang, Hua Qi
{"title":"Response of soil phosphorus fractions and microbial community network to straw returning: Insights from microbial phosphorus limitation","authors":"Xuelian Wang,&nbsp;Xinjie Ji,&nbsp;Anran Long,&nbsp;Jingwen Yang,&nbsp;Liyun Chang,&nbsp;Xiangwei Gong,&nbsp;Ying Jiang,&nbsp;Hua Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil microbial metabolism is usually limited by nutrients in agricultural ecosystems; however, the mechanism through which straw return determines microbial nutrient limitations by affecting soil phosphorus (P) fractions and microbial community networks remains unclear. We investigated the effects of no-tillage with straw return (NTS), plow tillage with straw return (PTS), rotary tillage with straw return (RTS), and conventional tillage (CT) without straw return (control) on soil microbial structure, co-occurrence networks, and assembly processes in Northeast China in 2023–2024. All soil microorganisms in the four treatments were subjected to P limitation, and compared with CT, the three straw returning practices significantly alleviated microbial P limitation to a certain extent. Straw returning promoted organic P mineralization and improved P availability by regulating P fractions, as shown by the increased inorganic P content of the NTS, PTS, and RTS treatments of 41.54 %, 6.25 % and 6.80 %, respectively (averaged across rhizosphere and bulk soil, and two years). Random forest and correlation analyses showed that NaHCO<sub>3</sub>–Po had a more significant response to P limitation. Straw returning practices did not change the soil bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere and bulk soil but decreased the fungal diversity through microbial high-throughput sequencing. Straw return-sensitive ASVs (rsASVs) was selectively aggregated in different modules, and straw returning induced specific responses in taxa/modules of microbial co–occurrence networks in the rhizosphere and bulk soil. Partial least squares path modeling found that, compared with fungi, changes in the bacterial community structure driven by straw returning crucially alleviated microbial P limitation. Overall, our results highlight the close relationship between microbial community structure and metabolic limitations and provide a theoretical basis for the application of straw returning in agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106698"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil microbial metabolism is usually limited by nutrients in agricultural ecosystems; however, the mechanism through which straw return determines microbial nutrient limitations by affecting soil phosphorus (P) fractions and microbial community networks remains unclear. We investigated the effects of no-tillage with straw return (NTS), plow tillage with straw return (PTS), rotary tillage with straw return (RTS), and conventional tillage (CT) without straw return (control) on soil microbial structure, co-occurrence networks, and assembly processes in Northeast China in 2023–2024. All soil microorganisms in the four treatments were subjected to P limitation, and compared with CT, the three straw returning practices significantly alleviated microbial P limitation to a certain extent. Straw returning promoted organic P mineralization and improved P availability by regulating P fractions, as shown by the increased inorganic P content of the NTS, PTS, and RTS treatments of 41.54 %, 6.25 % and 6.80 %, respectively (averaged across rhizosphere and bulk soil, and two years). Random forest and correlation analyses showed that NaHCO3–Po had a more significant response to P limitation. Straw returning practices did not change the soil bacterial diversity of the rhizosphere and bulk soil but decreased the fungal diversity through microbial high-throughput sequencing. Straw return-sensitive ASVs (rsASVs) was selectively aggregated in different modules, and straw returning induced specific responses in taxa/modules of microbial co–occurrence networks in the rhizosphere and bulk soil. Partial least squares path modeling found that, compared with fungi, changes in the bacterial community structure driven by straw returning crucially alleviated microbial P limitation. Overall, our results highlight the close relationship between microbial community structure and metabolic limitations and provide a theoretical basis for the application of straw returning in agriculture.
土壤磷组分和微生物群落网络对秸秆还田的响应:来自微生物磷限制的启示
在农业生态系统中,土壤微生物代谢通常受到养分的限制;然而,秸秆还田通过影响土壤磷(P)组分和微生物群落网络来决定微生物养分限制的机制尚不清楚。研究2023-2024年东北地区免耕秸秆还田(NTS)、犁耕秸秆还田(PTS)、旋耕秸秆还田(RTS)和常规不耕秸秆还田(对照)对土壤微生物结构、共生网络和组合过程的影响。4个处理的土壤微生物均受到磷限制,与CT相比,3个秸秆还田处理在一定程度上显著缓解了微生物磷限制。秸秆还田通过调节磷组分促进有机磷矿化和提高磷有效性,NTS、PTS和RTS处理的无机磷含量分别提高了41.54 %、6.25 %和6.80 %(根际和块土年平均值)。随机森林分析和相关分析表明,NaHCO3-Po对P限制的响应更为显著。秸秆还田对根际和块状土壤细菌多样性没有影响,但微生物高通量测序结果显示,秸秆还田降低了土壤真菌多样性。秸秆还田敏感型asv (rsasv)在不同模块中选择性聚集,秸秆还田在根际和块状土壤微生物共生网络的分类群/模块中引起了特定的响应。偏最小二乘路径建模发现,与真菌相比,秸秆还田驱动的细菌群落结构变化对微生物磷限制的缓解至关重要。总的来说,我们的研究结果突出了微生物群落结构与代谢限制之间的密切关系,并为秸秆还田在农业中的应用提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信