Development and validation of an electronic quality measure for postoperative respiratory failure

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109467
Garth H. Utter MD, MSc, FACS , Monika Ray PhD , Shao-You Fang PhD , Irina Tokareva BSN, RN, MAS , Mia Nievera MSN, RN , Meghan S. Weyrich MPH , Anna Michie MHS, PMP , Michelle Lefebvre BSN, RN , Chana West MSN, RN , Katie Magoulick MPH, MSW, LGSW , Michelle Schreiber MD , Patrick S. Romano MD, MPH
{"title":"Development and validation of an electronic quality measure for postoperative respiratory failure","authors":"Garth H. Utter MD, MSc, FACS ,&nbsp;Monika Ray PhD ,&nbsp;Shao-You Fang PhD ,&nbsp;Irina Tokareva BSN, RN, MAS ,&nbsp;Mia Nievera MSN, RN ,&nbsp;Meghan S. Weyrich MPH ,&nbsp;Anna Michie MHS, PMP ,&nbsp;Michelle Lefebvre BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Chana West MSN, RN ,&nbsp;Katie Magoulick MPH, MSW, LGSW ,&nbsp;Michelle Schreiber MD ,&nbsp;Patrick S. Romano MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperatively, prolonged mechanical ventilation or unplanned intubation—collectively, “postoperative respiratory failure”—has high morbidity and mortality risk, but hospitals' automated ability to detect this complication is currently limited.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We developed an electronic clinical quality measure for postoperative respiratory failure on the basis of input from clinical and quality experts. Using 2022 structured electronic health record data from 12 diverse hospitals encompassing 2 common electronic health record vendors, we retrospectively evaluated criteria for postoperative respiratory failure after an operation during an elective hospitalization. We sampled all denominator-eligible cases meeting postoperative respiratory failure criteria, and a subset that did not, from each center. Trained nurse abstractors reviewed medical records using a standard instrument. We assessed the positive and negative predictive value of the measure (with 95% confidence intervals), and the discrimination and calibration of its risk model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 95 records flagged by the measure and 310 denominator-eligible records not flagged, the postoperative respiratory failure electronic clinical quality measure numerator criteria had a positive predictive value of 88.7% (95% confidence intervals, 80.6–94.2%) and negative predictive value of 99.7% (95% confidence intervals, 98.2–100%). False-positive results frequently involved easily correctible respiratory therapist documentation errors. Risk-adjusted rates of postoperative respiratory failure across hospitals ranged from 0.0 to 16.8/1,000 hospitalizations. The risk model, which included 8 comorbidities, 6 laboratory tests, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, had a c-statistic of 0.91.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Postoperative respiratory failure can be measured with high validity from readily available, structured electronic health record data. A postoperative respiratory failure electronic clinical quality measure would not be dependent on administrative claims data or collection by trained abstractors, offering the potential to inform quality improvement in elective perioperative care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 109467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025003198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postoperatively, prolonged mechanical ventilation or unplanned intubation—collectively, “postoperative respiratory failure”—has high morbidity and mortality risk, but hospitals' automated ability to detect this complication is currently limited.

Study Design

We developed an electronic clinical quality measure for postoperative respiratory failure on the basis of input from clinical and quality experts. Using 2022 structured electronic health record data from 12 diverse hospitals encompassing 2 common electronic health record vendors, we retrospectively evaluated criteria for postoperative respiratory failure after an operation during an elective hospitalization. We sampled all denominator-eligible cases meeting postoperative respiratory failure criteria, and a subset that did not, from each center. Trained nurse abstractors reviewed medical records using a standard instrument. We assessed the positive and negative predictive value of the measure (with 95% confidence intervals), and the discrimination and calibration of its risk model.

Results

Among 95 records flagged by the measure and 310 denominator-eligible records not flagged, the postoperative respiratory failure electronic clinical quality measure numerator criteria had a positive predictive value of 88.7% (95% confidence intervals, 80.6–94.2%) and negative predictive value of 99.7% (95% confidence intervals, 98.2–100%). False-positive results frequently involved easily correctible respiratory therapist documentation errors. Risk-adjusted rates of postoperative respiratory failure across hospitals ranged from 0.0 to 16.8/1,000 hospitalizations. The risk model, which included 8 comorbidities, 6 laboratory tests, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, had a c-statistic of 0.91.

Conclusion

Postoperative respiratory failure can be measured with high validity from readily available, structured electronic health record data. A postoperative respiratory failure electronic clinical quality measure would not be dependent on administrative claims data or collection by trained abstractors, offering the potential to inform quality improvement in elective perioperative care.

Abstract Image

术后呼吸衰竭电子质量测量的开发与验证
术后,长时间机械通气或计划外插管(统称为“术后呼吸衰竭”)具有很高的发病率和死亡率,但目前医院自动检测这一并发症的能力有限。研究设计:我们在临床和质量专家的基础上开发了一种用于术后呼吸衰竭的电子临床质量测量方法。使用来自12家不同医院(包括2家常见电子病历供应商)的2022个结构化电子病历数据,我们回顾性评估了选择性住院期间手术后呼吸衰竭的标准。我们从每个中心抽取所有符合分母条件的病例,符合术后呼吸衰竭标准,以及不符合标准的子集。训练有素的护士文摘员使用标准仪器审查医疗记录。我们评估了该措施的正负预测值(95%置信区间),以及其风险模型的判别和校准。结果在95条被标记的记录和310条未标记分母合格的记录中,术后呼吸衰竭电子临床质量测量分子标准的阳性预测值为88.7%(95%置信区间,80.6 ~ 94.2%),阴性预测值为99.7%(95%置信区间,98.2 ~ 100%)。假阳性结果经常涉及容易纠正的呼吸治疗师文件错误。各医院术后呼吸衰竭的风险调整率从0.0至16.8/1,000住院患者不等。该风险模型包括8项合并症、6项实验室检查和美国麻醉医师协会的身体状态分类,c统计量为0.91。结论术后呼吸衰竭可通过易于获取、结构化的电子病历数据进行有效测量。术后呼吸衰竭电子临床质量测量将不依赖于行政索赔数据或由训练有素的抽象人员收集,为选择性围手术期护理的质量改进提供了潜在的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信