Deep learning reconstruction for T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance enterography imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: Assessment of image quality and clinical utility
IF 1.5 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Choong-Wui Cho , Myung-Won You , Munyoung Paek , Dominik Nickel , Sung Kyoung Moon
{"title":"Deep learning reconstruction for T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance enterography imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: Assessment of image quality and clinical utility","authors":"Choong-Wui Cho , Myung-Won You , Munyoung Paek , Dominik Nickel , Sung Kyoung Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the image quality of deep learning-reconstructed T2-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (DL T2 HASTE) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (DL T1 VIBE) of magnetic resonance enterography in patients with Crohn's disease.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ninety-three patients for the comparison between T2 HASTE and DL T2 HASTE, and forty-two patients for the comparison between T1 VIBE and DL T1 VIBE were enrolled. Two reviewers assessed image quality using 5-point scale scoring, and subjective reviewer preferences. Acquisition times were also compared. The diagnostic performance for the detection of active inflammation was evaluated in three bowel segments (ileum, terminal ileum, and right colon).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The interobserver agreement on image quality was better for T2 HASTE (0.624, standard error 0.083), and T1 VIBE (0.53, SE 0.113) than for DL T2 HASTE (0.443, SE 0.111) and DL T1 VIBE (0.173, SE 0.153). The mean image quality scores showed no significant differences between T2 HASTE and DL T2 HASTE images, as well as between T1 VIBE and DL T1 VIBE images (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Both reviewers preferred T2 HASTE over DL T2 HASTE, although the preference between T1 VIBE and DL T1 VIBE was controversial. The acquisition times were shorter for DL T2 HASTE (16.17 ± 2.53 s) and DL T1 VIBE (14.19 ± 0.84 s) compared to T2 HASTE and T1 VIBE. The per-segment diagnostic performance for detecting active inflammation was identical between T2 HASTE and DL T2 HASTE.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DL-reconstruction allows one-breath hold scan while maintaining image quality in both T2 HASTE and T1 VIBE images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 110528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125001287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the image quality of deep learning-reconstructed T2-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (DL T2 HASTE) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (DL T1 VIBE) of magnetic resonance enterography in patients with Crohn's disease.
Methods
Ninety-three patients for the comparison between T2 HASTE and DL T2 HASTE, and forty-two patients for the comparison between T1 VIBE and DL T1 VIBE were enrolled. Two reviewers assessed image quality using 5-point scale scoring, and subjective reviewer preferences. Acquisition times were also compared. The diagnostic performance for the detection of active inflammation was evaluated in three bowel segments (ileum, terminal ileum, and right colon).
Results
The interobserver agreement on image quality was better for T2 HASTE (0.624, standard error 0.083), and T1 VIBE (0.53, SE 0.113) than for DL T2 HASTE (0.443, SE 0.111) and DL T1 VIBE (0.173, SE 0.153). The mean image quality scores showed no significant differences between T2 HASTE and DL T2 HASTE images, as well as between T1 VIBE and DL T1 VIBE images (p > 0.05). Both reviewers preferred T2 HASTE over DL T2 HASTE, although the preference between T1 VIBE and DL T1 VIBE was controversial. The acquisition times were shorter for DL T2 HASTE (16.17 ± 2.53 s) and DL T1 VIBE (14.19 ± 0.84 s) compared to T2 HASTE and T1 VIBE. The per-segment diagnostic performance for detecting active inflammation was identical between T2 HASTE and DL T2 HASTE.
Conclusion
DL-reconstruction allows one-breath hold scan while maintaining image quality in both T2 HASTE and T1 VIBE images.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology