Insight into Underground Hydrogen Storage in Aquifers: Current Status, Modeling, Economic Approaches and Future Outlook

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Babalola Aisosa Oni*, Ismail Akamu Adebayo, Victor Oyebamiji Ojo and Christopher Nkansah, 
{"title":"Insight into Underground Hydrogen Storage in Aquifers: Current Status, Modeling, Economic Approaches and Future Outlook","authors":"Babalola Aisosa Oni*,&nbsp;Ismail Akamu Adebayo,&nbsp;Victor Oyebamiji Ojo and Christopher Nkansah,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c0148810.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Aquifers are considered one of the most eco-friendly forms of underground hydrogen storage due to their widespread availability, natural porosity, minimal requirement for structural modification, and reduced environmental disruption compared to other options, such as salt caverns or depleted reservoirs. However, the number of active aquifer-based hydrogen storage projects is limited, as most current storage efforts focus on depleted fields and salt caverns. Unlike salt caverns, which require extensive mining and energy-intensive leaching processes or depleted reservoirs that may pose risks of residual hydrocarbons contaminating stored hydrogen, aquifers typically involve fewer invasive preparatory measures. Additionally, their wide geographical distribution makes them accessible without significant infrastructure development, reducing the carbon footprint associated with site preparation and operation. With careful monitoring to mitigate risks, such as microbial hydrogen consumption, aquifers offer a sustainable and less intrusive alternative for large-scale hydrogen storage. This is crucial for scaling up hydrogen as a primary energy carrier in global decarbonization efforts. While aquifers show high potential, their use for hydrogen storage remains underdeveloped, requiring significant research and development investment. Hydrogen’s interaction with aquifer materials poses risks, necessitating rigorous site assessments and mitigation strategies. Despite existing challenges, economic assessments indicate that aquifer costs are unpredictable due to a lack of reservoir characterization. This review further discusses the geological properties, H<sub>2</sub> loss pathway and mitigation strategies, sealing technologies, potential storage sites, challenges and economic analysis of H<sub>2</sub> storage in aquifers.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 22","pages":"10274–10303 10274–10303"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aquifers are considered one of the most eco-friendly forms of underground hydrogen storage due to their widespread availability, natural porosity, minimal requirement for structural modification, and reduced environmental disruption compared to other options, such as salt caverns or depleted reservoirs. However, the number of active aquifer-based hydrogen storage projects is limited, as most current storage efforts focus on depleted fields and salt caverns. Unlike salt caverns, which require extensive mining and energy-intensive leaching processes or depleted reservoirs that may pose risks of residual hydrocarbons contaminating stored hydrogen, aquifers typically involve fewer invasive preparatory measures. Additionally, their wide geographical distribution makes them accessible without significant infrastructure development, reducing the carbon footprint associated with site preparation and operation. With careful monitoring to mitigate risks, such as microbial hydrogen consumption, aquifers offer a sustainable and less intrusive alternative for large-scale hydrogen storage. This is crucial for scaling up hydrogen as a primary energy carrier in global decarbonization efforts. While aquifers show high potential, their use for hydrogen storage remains underdeveloped, requiring significant research and development investment. Hydrogen’s interaction with aquifer materials poses risks, necessitating rigorous site assessments and mitigation strategies. Despite existing challenges, economic assessments indicate that aquifer costs are unpredictable due to a lack of reservoir characterization. This review further discusses the geological properties, H2 loss pathway and mitigation strategies, sealing technologies, potential storage sites, challenges and economic analysis of H2 storage in aquifers.

Abstract Image

蓄水层地下储氢研究:现状、建模、经济方法和未来展望
含水层被认为是最环保的地下储氢形式之一,因为与其他选择(如盐洞或枯竭的储层)相比,含水层具有广泛的可用性、天然孔隙度、对结构修改的要求最低、对环境的破坏也更小。然而,活跃的基于含水层的储氢项目数量有限,因为目前大多数储氢工作都集中在枯竭的油田和盐洞上。与盐穴不同的是,盐穴需要大量的开采和能源密集型的浸出过程,或者枯竭的储层可能会造成残留碳氢化合物污染储存的氢的风险,而含水层通常需要较少的侵入性准备措施。此外,它们广泛的地理分布使它们无需重大的基础设施开发即可进入,从而减少了与场地准备和运营相关的碳足迹。通过仔细监测以降低风险,例如微生物耗氢,含水层为大规模储氢提供了可持续的、侵入性较小的替代方案。这对于扩大氢作为全球脱碳努力的主要能源载体至关重要。虽然含水层显示出巨大的潜力,但它们在储氢方面的应用仍然不发达,需要大量的研发投资。氢与含水层物质的相互作用带来了风险,需要严格的现场评估和缓解战略。尽管存在挑战,但经济评估表明,由于缺乏储层特征,含水层成本是不可预测的。本文进一步讨论了地质性质、氢气损失途径和缓解策略、密封技术、潜在储存地点、挑战和经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信