Length dependence of waveform mismatch: a caveat on waveform accuracy

IF 3.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Keefe Mitman, Leo C Stein, Michael Boyle, Nils Deppe, Lawrence E Kidder, Harald P Pfeiffer and Mark A Scheel
{"title":"Length dependence of waveform mismatch: a caveat on waveform accuracy","authors":"Keefe Mitman, Leo C Stein, Michael Boyle, Nils Deppe, Lawrence E Kidder, Harald P Pfeiffer and Mark A Scheel","doi":"10.1088/1361-6382/add8d9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes Collaboration’s code SpEC can now routinely simulate binary black hole mergers undergoing orbits, with the longest simulations undergoing nearly orbits. While this sounds impressive, the mismatch between the highest resolutions for this long simulation is . Meanwhile, the mismatch between resolutions for the more typical simulations tends to be , despite the resolutions being similar to the long simulations’. In this note, we explain why mismatch alone gives an incomplete picture of code—and waveform—quality, especially in the context of providing waveform templates for LISA and 3G detectors, which require templates with orbits. We argue that to ready the GW community for the sensitivity of future detectors, numerical relativity groups must be aware of this caveat, and also run future simulations with at least three resolutions to properly assess waveform accuracy.","PeriodicalId":10282,"journal":{"name":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/add8d9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes Collaboration’s code SpEC can now routinely simulate binary black hole mergers undergoing orbits, with the longest simulations undergoing nearly orbits. While this sounds impressive, the mismatch between the highest resolutions for this long simulation is . Meanwhile, the mismatch between resolutions for the more typical simulations tends to be , despite the resolutions being similar to the long simulations’. In this note, we explain why mismatch alone gives an incomplete picture of code—and waveform—quality, especially in the context of providing waveform templates for LISA and 3G detectors, which require templates with orbits. We argue that to ready the GW community for the sensitivity of future detectors, numerical relativity groups must be aware of this caveat, and also run future simulations with at least three resolutions to properly assess waveform accuracy.
波形失配的长度依赖性:对波形精度的警告
模拟极端时空协作的代码SpEC现在可以常规地模拟运行轨道的双黑洞合并,最长的模拟运行近轨道。虽然这听起来令人印象深刻,但这个长时间模拟的最高分辨率之间的不匹配是。与此同时,更典型模拟的分辨率之间的不匹配往往是,尽管分辨率与长模拟相似。在本文中,我们解释了为什么单是失配就不能完整地描述代码和波形质量,特别是在为LISA和3G探测器提供波形模板的背景下,这需要有轨道的模板。我们认为,为了让GW社区为未来探测器的灵敏度做好准备,数值相对论小组必须意识到这一警告,并在未来以至少三种分辨率进行模拟,以正确评估波形精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Classical and Quantum Gravity 物理-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.60%
发文量
301
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Classical and Quantum Gravity is an established journal for physicists, mathematicians and cosmologists in the fields of gravitation and the theory of spacetime. The journal is now the acknowledged world leader in classical relativity and all areas of quantum gravity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信