The Performance of a New Multidimensional Frailty Index in Comparison to the Frailty Phenotype to Assess Frailty in People Living with HIV 50 Years of Age and Older in an Urban HIV Clinic.

Uzoamaka A Eke, Katie Wasserstein, Carolyn Susman, Ahizechukwu C Eke, Kareshma Mohanty, Sarah Schmalzle, Nicole Viviano, Jennifer D Hoffmann, Neha S Pandit, Robyn Palmeiro, Judith Lee, Alice S Ryan, Kristen A Stafford, Ann Gruber-Baldini
{"title":"The Performance of a New Multidimensional Frailty Index in Comparison to the Frailty Phenotype to Assess Frailty in People Living with HIV 50 Years of Age and Older in an Urban HIV Clinic.","authors":"Uzoamaka A Eke, Katie Wasserstein, Carolyn Susman, Ahizechukwu C Eke, Kareshma Mohanty, Sarah Schmalzle, Nicole Viviano, Jennifer D Hoffmann, Neha S Pandit, Robyn Palmeiro, Judith Lee, Alice S Ryan, Kristen A Stafford, Ann Gruber-Baldini","doi":"10.33696/aids.7.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is increasingly recognized in older people living with HIV (PLWH), but optimal diagnostics are yet to be determined. Frailty indices (FI) represent an accumulation of health deficits shown to correlate better with mortality and adverse effects of aging than the frailty phenotype or chronological age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of frailty assessments in PLWH aged ≥ 50 years in a multidisciplinary urban HIV clinic. Frailty was assessed using Frailty Phenotype (FP) and a new 40-variable clinical composite FI derived from routine clinical and laboratory data (CCFI). CCFI scores were categorized into robust (≤ 0.15), pre-frail (>0.15-0.4), and frail (>0.4). CCFI frailty and its association with frailty-related factors were analyzed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 165 participants were mostly black (94%) and male (56%), with median age 59 years (IQR 55-63), CD4 count 606 cells/μl (IQR 393-873), and 78% had HIV viral load ≤ 40 copies/ml. 70% had multimorbidity, 38% falls, 25% poor cognition, and 24% polypharmacy. By FP, 2% were frail, 65% prefrail, and 33% robust. By CCFI, 26% were frail, 67% prefrail, and 7% robust (range 0.08-0.57; mean 0.34 ±0.11). For FP categorized as robust, prefrail and frail, the mean CCFI was 0.31 ± 0.1, 0.35 ± 0.11 and 0.38 ± 0.08 respectively (P=0.06). Cognition (OR 3.64, p=0.003), falls (OR 5.09, p<0.001), polypharmacy of 6-9 medications (OR 3.07, p=0.03) and ≥ 10 medications (OR 4.25, p=0.009) and >3 comorbidities (OR 3.06, p=0.03) were associated with CCFI frailty, adjusted for age and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of older PLWH were pre-frail or frail. The CCFI identified more patients as frail and had significant clinical associations compared to FP.</p>","PeriodicalId":519937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AIDS and HIV treatment","volume":"7 1","pages":"27-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AIDS and HIV treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/aids.7.058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty is increasingly recognized in older people living with HIV (PLWH), but optimal diagnostics are yet to be determined. Frailty indices (FI) represent an accumulation of health deficits shown to correlate better with mortality and adverse effects of aging than the frailty phenotype or chronological age.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of frailty assessments in PLWH aged ≥ 50 years in a multidisciplinary urban HIV clinic. Frailty was assessed using Frailty Phenotype (FP) and a new 40-variable clinical composite FI derived from routine clinical and laboratory data (CCFI). CCFI scores were categorized into robust (≤ 0.15), pre-frail (>0.15-0.4), and frail (>0.4). CCFI frailty and its association with frailty-related factors were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results: The 165 participants were mostly black (94%) and male (56%), with median age 59 years (IQR 55-63), CD4 count 606 cells/μl (IQR 393-873), and 78% had HIV viral load ≤ 40 copies/ml. 70% had multimorbidity, 38% falls, 25% poor cognition, and 24% polypharmacy. By FP, 2% were frail, 65% prefrail, and 33% robust. By CCFI, 26% were frail, 67% prefrail, and 7% robust (range 0.08-0.57; mean 0.34 ±0.11). For FP categorized as robust, prefrail and frail, the mean CCFI was 0.31 ± 0.1, 0.35 ± 0.11 and 0.38 ± 0.08 respectively (P=0.06). Cognition (OR 3.64, p=0.003), falls (OR 5.09, p<0.001), polypharmacy of 6-9 medications (OR 3.07, p=0.03) and ≥ 10 medications (OR 4.25, p=0.009) and >3 comorbidities (OR 3.06, p=0.03) were associated with CCFI frailty, adjusted for age and sex.

Conclusion: The majority of older PLWH were pre-frail or frail. The CCFI identified more patients as frail and had significant clinical associations compared to FP.

一种新的多维脆弱性指数与脆弱性表型的比较在城市HIV诊所评估50岁及以上HIV感染者的脆弱性
背景:越来越多的老年人艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)认识到虚弱,但最佳诊断尚未确定。虚弱指数(FI)代表健康缺陷的累积,与虚弱表型或实足年龄相比,与死亡率和衰老的不良影响有更好的相关性。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在多学科的城市HIV诊所对年龄≥50岁的PLWH进行虚弱评估。使用脆弱表型(FP)和从常规临床和实验室数据(CCFI)衍生的新的40变量临床复合FI来评估脆弱性。CCFI评分分为稳健(≤0.15)、预虚弱(>0.15-0.4)和虚弱(>0.4)。采用logistic回归分析CCFI脆弱性及其与脆弱性相关因素的关系。结果:165名参与者以黑人(94%)和男性(56%)居多,中位年龄59岁(IQR 55 ~ 63), CD4细胞计数606个/μl (IQR 393 ~ 873), 78% HIV病毒载量≤40拷贝/ml。70%为多病,38%跌倒,25%认知不良,24%多药。按FP计算,2%体弱,65%体弱,33%健壮。通过CCFI, 26%虚弱,67%虚弱,7%健壮(范围0.08-0.57;平均0.34±0.11)。稳健型、弱前型和弱前型FP的CCFI平均值分别为0.31±0.1、0.35±0.11和0.38±0.08 (P=0.06)。认知(OR 3.64, p=0.003)、跌倒(OR 5.09, p3合并症(OR 3.06, p=0.03)与CCFI衰弱相关,经年龄和性别调整。结论:老年PLWH多为体弱前期或体弱。与FP相比,CCFI鉴定出更多虚弱的患者,并具有显著的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信