Clinical Outcomes of Double Kissing Culotte and Mini-Culotte Stenting in Non-Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The OPTIMUM Trial.

Serkan Kahraman, Deniz Demirci, Gökhan Demirci, Yunus Emre Erata, Mustafa Ali Yavaş, İrem Türkmen, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Serkan Aslan, Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus, Ümit Bulut, Ahmet Güner, Ahmet Arif Yalçın, Ali Kemal Kalkan, Mehmet Ertürk
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Double Kissing Culotte and Mini-Culotte Stenting in Non-Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The OPTIMUM Trial.","authors":"Serkan Kahraman, Deniz Demirci, Gökhan Demirci, Yunus Emre Erata, Mustafa Ali Yavaş, İrem Türkmen, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Serkan Aslan, Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus, Ümit Bulut, Ahmet Güner, Ahmet Arif Yalçın, Ali Kemal Kalkan, Mehmet Ertürk","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2025.98697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Culotte stenting is one of the most commonly used bifurcation stenting techniques. Double kissing mini-culotte (DKC) stenting, a modified version of culotte stenting, is currently recommended by clinical guidelines. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of DKC and mini-culotte (MC) techniques in true non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 200 patients with non-left main CBLs undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were assigned to either MC stenting (n = 92) or DKC stenting (n = 108). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at one- and three-year follow up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of TLF was significantly lower in the DKC group at both one year [7 (7.6%) vs. 1 (0.9%), P = 0.017] and three years [18 (19.6%) vs. 6 (5.6%), P = 0.002], primarily driven by a reduction in TLR at one year [6 (6.5%) vs. 1 (0.9%), P = 0.033] and three years [13 (14.1%) vs. 5 (4.6%), P = 0.018]. Fewer patients experienced TVMI [4 (4.3%) vs. 3 (2.8%), P = 0.551] and cardiac death [5 (5.4%) vs. 1 (0.9%), P = 0.064] in the DKC group at three years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with true non-left main CBLs, the DKC technique was associated with a lower incidence of TLF and TLR at three years compared to the MC technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":"53 4","pages":"238-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2025.98697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Culotte stenting is one of the most commonly used bifurcation stenting techniques. Double kissing mini-culotte (DKC) stenting, a modified version of culotte stenting, is currently recommended by clinical guidelines. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of DKC and mini-culotte (MC) techniques in true non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs).

Method: A total of 200 patients with non-left main CBLs undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were assigned to either MC stenting (n = 92) or DKC stenting (n = 108). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at one- and three-year follow up.

Results: The incidence of TLF was significantly lower in the DKC group at both one year [7 (7.6%) vs. 1 (0.9%), P = 0.017] and three years [18 (19.6%) vs. 6 (5.6%), P = 0.002], primarily driven by a reduction in TLR at one year [6 (6.5%) vs. 1 (0.9%), P = 0.033] and three years [13 (14.1%) vs. 5 (4.6%), P = 0.018]. Fewer patients experienced TVMI [4 (4.3%) vs. 3 (2.8%), P = 0.551] and cardiac death [5 (5.4%) vs. 1 (0.9%), P = 0.064] in the DKC group at three years.

Conclusion: In patients with true non-left main CBLs, the DKC technique was associated with a lower incidence of TLF and TLR at three years compared to the MC technique.

非左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的双吻合器和小管支架置入的临床效果:最佳试验。
目的:血管支架术是最常用的分支支架术之一。双吻合器微型血管支架术(DKC)是一种改良版的血管支架术,目前被临床指南推荐。本研究的目的是比较DKC和微型血管(MC)技术在真正的非左主干冠状动脉分叉病变(CBLs)中的结果。方法:共200例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的非左主干CBLs患者被分配到MC支架(n = 92)或DKC支架(n = 108)。主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF),定义为1年和3年随访时心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(TVMI)和靶病变血运重建(TLR)的复合。结果:DKC组1年[7年(7.6%)比1年(0.9%),P = 0.017]和3年[18年(19.6%)比6年(5.6%),P = 0.002] TLF发生率均显著降低,主要是由于1年[6年(6.5%)比1年(0.9%),P = 0.033]和3年[13年(14.1%)比5年(4.6%),P = 0.018] TLR降低所致。DKC组3年发生TVMI[4例(4.3%)vs. 3例(2.8%),P = 0.551]和心源性死亡[5例(5.4%)vs. 1例(0.9%),P = 0.064]的患者较少。结论:在真正的非左主干CBLs患者中,与MC技术相比,DKC技术与三年后TLF和TLR的发生率较低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信