P300-based brain-computer interface for communication in assistive technology centres: influence of users' profile on BCI access.

IF 3.8
Valentina Galiotta, Valentina Caracci, Jlenia Toppi, Floriana Pichiorri, Emma Colamarino, Febo Cincotti, Donatella Mattia, Angela Riccio
{"title":"P300-based brain-computer interface for communication in assistive technology centres: influence of users' profile on BCI access.","authors":"Valentina Galiotta, Valentina Caracci, Jlenia Toppi, Floriana Pichiorri, Emma Colamarino, Febo Cincotti, Donatella Mattia, Angela Riccio","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/addf7f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Assistive technology (AT) refers to any product that enables people to live independently and with dignity and to participate in activities of daily life. A brain-computer interface (BCI) is an AT that provides an alternative output, based on neurophysiological signals, to control an external device. The aim of the study is to screen patients accessing an AT-centre to investigate their eligibility for BCI access and the factors influencing the BCI control.<i>Approach</i>. Thirty-five users and 11 healthy subjects were included in the study. Participants were required to operate a P300-speller BCI. We evaluated the influence of clinical diagnosis, socio-demographic factors, level of dependence and disability of users, neuropsychological profile on BCI performance.<i>Main results</i>. The 7.1% of the users controlled the system with a mean accuracy of 93.6 ± 8.0%, while 8 users had an online accuracy below 70%. We found that the neuropsychological profile significantly affected online accuracy and ITR.<i>Significance</i>. The percentage of users who had an accuracy considered functional for communication is an encouraging data in terms of BCI effectiveness. The results regarding accuracy and factors influencing (and not influencing) it, are a contribution to the introduction of BCIs in the AT-centres, considering the BCI for communication both as an AT and as an additional input to provide multimodal access to AT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/addf7f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Assistive technology (AT) refers to any product that enables people to live independently and with dignity and to participate in activities of daily life. A brain-computer interface (BCI) is an AT that provides an alternative output, based on neurophysiological signals, to control an external device. The aim of the study is to screen patients accessing an AT-centre to investigate their eligibility for BCI access and the factors influencing the BCI control.Approach. Thirty-five users and 11 healthy subjects were included in the study. Participants were required to operate a P300-speller BCI. We evaluated the influence of clinical diagnosis, socio-demographic factors, level of dependence and disability of users, neuropsychological profile on BCI performance.Main results. The 7.1% of the users controlled the system with a mean accuracy of 93.6 ± 8.0%, while 8 users had an online accuracy below 70%. We found that the neuropsychological profile significantly affected online accuracy and ITR.Significance. The percentage of users who had an accuracy considered functional for communication is an encouraging data in terms of BCI effectiveness. The results regarding accuracy and factors influencing (and not influencing) it, are a contribution to the introduction of BCIs in the AT-centres, considering the BCI for communication both as an AT and as an additional input to provide multimodal access to AT.

基于p300的辅助技术中心脑机接口通信:用户档案对脑机接口访问的影响
目的:辅助技术(AT)是指使人们能够独立地、有尊严地生活并参与日常生活活动的任何产品。脑机接口(BCI)是一种基于神经生理信号提供另一种输出来控制外部设备的AT。本研究的目的是筛选进入at中心的患者,以调查其BCI接入的资格以及影响BCI控制的因素。35名使用者和11名健康受试者参与了这项研究。参与者被要求操作p300拼写者脑机接口。我们评估了临床诊断、社会人口学因素、使用者的依赖程度和残疾程度、神经心理特征对脑机接口性能的影响。7.1%的用户控制系统,平均准确率为93.6±8.0%,8名用户在线准确率低于70%。我们发现神经心理特征显著影响在线准确性和ITR。 ;就脑机接口的有效性而言,被认为具有通信功能的准确性的用户百分比是一个令人鼓舞的数据。关于准确性和影响(和不影响)它的因素的结果,是对在AT中心引入脑机接口的贡献,考虑到通信的脑机接口既作为AT,也作为提供多模式AT访问的额外输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信