Artificial Intelligence in Patch Testing: Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and Future Prospects in Dermatology.

Q3 Medicine
JMIR dermatology Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI:10.2196/67154
Hilary S Tang, Joseph Ebriani, Matthew J Yan, Shannon Wongvibulsin, Mehdi Farshchian
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Patch Testing: Comprehensive Review of Current Applications and Future Prospects in Dermatology.","authors":"Hilary S Tang, Joseph Ebriani, Matthew J Yan, Shannon Wongvibulsin, Mehdi Farshchian","doi":"10.2196/67154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) holds the potential to standardize diagnoses, reduce interobserver variability, and improve overall diagnostic accuracy. However, the challenges and limitations hindering clinical implementation have not been thoroughly explored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This narrative review aims to examine the current applications of AI in patch testing, identify challenges, and propose future directions for their use in dermatology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed was searched in August 2024 to identify studies involving human participants undergoing patch testing with AI used in the study. Exclusion criteria were non-English and nonoriginal research. Data were synthesized to assess study design, performance, and potential for clinical application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 94 reviewed articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies employed convolutional neural networks (CNN) for image analysis, with accuracy rates ranging from 90.1% to 99.5%. Other AI models, such as gradient boosting and random forest, were used for risk prediction and biomarker discovery. Key limitations included limited sample sizes, variability in image capture protocols, and lack of standardized reporting on skin types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI has significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, standardize patch test interpretation, and expand access to patch testing. However, standardized imaging protocols, larger and more diverse datasets, and improved regulatory frameworks are necessary to realize the full potential of AI in patch testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e67154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) holds the potential to standardize diagnoses, reduce interobserver variability, and improve overall diagnostic accuracy. However, the challenges and limitations hindering clinical implementation have not been thoroughly explored.

Objective: This narrative review aims to examine the current applications of AI in patch testing, identify challenges, and propose future directions for their use in dermatology.

Methods: PubMed was searched in August 2024 to identify studies involving human participants undergoing patch testing with AI used in the study. Exclusion criteria were non-English and nonoriginal research. Data were synthesized to assess study design, performance, and potential for clinical application.

Results: Out of 94 reviewed articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies employed convolutional neural networks (CNN) for image analysis, with accuracy rates ranging from 90.1% to 99.5%. Other AI models, such as gradient boosting and random forest, were used for risk prediction and biomarker discovery. Key limitations included limited sample sizes, variability in image capture protocols, and lack of standardized reporting on skin types.

Conclusions: AI has significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, standardize patch test interpretation, and expand access to patch testing. However, standardized imaging protocols, larger and more diverse datasets, and improved regulatory frameworks are necessary to realize the full potential of AI in patch testing.

人工智能在皮肤贴片检测中的应用与展望
背景:将人工智能(AI)集成到过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的贴片测试中,有可能标准化诊断,减少观察者之间的差异,并提高整体诊断的准确性。然而,阻碍临床实施的挑战和限制尚未得到充分探讨。目的:本文综述了目前人工智能在皮肤病学补丁测试中的应用,确定了挑战,并提出了人工智能在皮肤病学应用的未来方向。方法:于2024年8月检索PubMed,以确定涉及人类参与者的研究,该研究使用人工智能进行补丁测试。排除标准是非英语和非原创研究。综合数据以评估研究设计、性能和临床应用潜力。结果:94篇综述文章中,10篇符合纳入标准。大多数研究采用卷积神经网络(CNN)进行图像分析,准确率在90.1%到99.5%之间。其他人工智能模型,如梯度增强和随机森林,用于风险预测和生物标志物发现。主要的限制包括样本量有限,图像捕获方案的可变性,以及缺乏对皮肤类型的标准化报告。结论:人工智能在提高诊断准确性、规范补丁测试解释和扩大补丁测试可及性方面具有巨大潜力。然而,标准化的成像协议、更大、更多样化的数据集以及改进的监管框架是实现人工智能在补丁测试中的全部潜力所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信