Clinical Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Blood Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer.

IF 55 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aasma Shaukat, Carol A Burke, Andrew T Chan, William M Grady, Samir Gupta, Bryson W Katona, Uri Ladabaum, Peter S Liang, Julia J Liu, Girish Putcha, Douglas J Robertson, Robert E Schoen, Zhen Meng, Andrew Piscitello, Chung-Kai Sun, Chuanbo Xu, C Jimmy Lin, Lilian C Lee, Lance Baldo, Theodore R Levin
{"title":"Clinical Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Blood Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Aasma Shaukat, Carol A Burke, Andrew T Chan, William M Grady, Samir Gupta, Bryson W Katona, Uri Ladabaum, Peter S Liang, Julia J Liu, Girish Putcha, Douglas J Robertson, Robert E Schoen, Zhen Meng, Andrew Piscitello, Chung-Kai Sun, Chuanbo Xu, C Jimmy Lin, Lilian C Lee, Lance Baldo, Theodore R Levin","doi":"10.1001/jama.2025.7515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Colorectal cancer screening is widely recommended but underused. Blood-based screening offers the potential for higher adherence compared with endoscopy or stool-based testing but must first be clinically validated in a screening population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance of an investigational blood-based circulating tumor DNA test for colorectal cancer detection in an average-risk population using colonoscopy with histopathology as the reference method.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study enrolling participants between May 2020 and April 2022 who were asymptomatic adults aged 45 to 85 years, at average risk of colorectal cancer, and willing to undergo a standard-of-care screening colonoscopy. Participants, staff, and pathologists were blinded to blood test results, and laboratory testing was performed blinded to colonoscopy findings. The study was conducted at 201 centers across 49 US states and the United Arab Emirates. Site-based and mobile phlebotomy were used for blood collection.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Participants were required to complete a screening colonoscopy after blood collection.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end points were sensitivity for colorectal cancer, specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions), negative predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia, and positive predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia. The secondary end point was sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of participants in the evaluable cohort (n = 27 010) was 57.0 years, and 55.8% were women. Sensitivity for colorectal cancer was 79.2% (57/72; 95% CI, 68.4%-86.9%) and specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 91.5% (22 306/24 371; 95% CI, 91.2%-91.9%). The negative predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 90.8% (22 306/24 567; 95% CI, 90.7%-90.9%) and the positive predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 15.5% (378/2443; 95% CI, 14.2%-16.8%). All primary end points met prespecified acceptance criteria. The sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions was 12.5% (321/2567; 95% CI, 11.3%-13.8%), which did not meet the prespecified acceptance criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In an average-risk colorectal cancer screening population, a blood-based test demonstrated acceptable accuracy for colorectal cancer detection, but detection of advanced precancerous lesions remains a challenge, and ongoing efforts are needed to improve test sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04369053.</p>","PeriodicalId":54909,"journal":{"name":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"56-63"},"PeriodicalIF":55.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.7515","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Colorectal cancer screening is widely recommended but underused. Blood-based screening offers the potential for higher adherence compared with endoscopy or stool-based testing but must first be clinically validated in a screening population.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of an investigational blood-based circulating tumor DNA test for colorectal cancer detection in an average-risk population using colonoscopy with histopathology as the reference method.

Design, setting, and participants: Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study enrolling participants between May 2020 and April 2022 who were asymptomatic adults aged 45 to 85 years, at average risk of colorectal cancer, and willing to undergo a standard-of-care screening colonoscopy. Participants, staff, and pathologists were blinded to blood test results, and laboratory testing was performed blinded to colonoscopy findings. The study was conducted at 201 centers across 49 US states and the United Arab Emirates. Site-based and mobile phlebotomy were used for blood collection.

Exposures: Participants were required to complete a screening colonoscopy after blood collection.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end points were sensitivity for colorectal cancer, specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions), negative predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia, and positive predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia. The secondary end point was sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions.

Results: The median age of participants in the evaluable cohort (n = 27 010) was 57.0 years, and 55.8% were women. Sensitivity for colorectal cancer was 79.2% (57/72; 95% CI, 68.4%-86.9%) and specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 91.5% (22 306/24 371; 95% CI, 91.2%-91.9%). The negative predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 90.8% (22 306/24 567; 95% CI, 90.7%-90.9%) and the positive predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 15.5% (378/2443; 95% CI, 14.2%-16.8%). All primary end points met prespecified acceptance criteria. The sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions was 12.5% (321/2567; 95% CI, 11.3%-13.8%), which did not meet the prespecified acceptance criterion.

Conclusions and relevance: In an average-risk colorectal cancer screening population, a blood-based test demonstrated acceptable accuracy for colorectal cancer detection, but detection of advanced precancerous lesions remains a challenge, and ongoing efforts are needed to improve test sensitivity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04369053.

循环肿瘤dna血液检测筛查结直肠癌的临床验证
重要性:结直肠癌筛查被广泛推荐,但未被充分利用。与内窥镜检查或粪便检查相比,基于血液的筛查具有更高的依从性,但必须首先在筛查人群中进行临床验证。目的:以结肠镜检查和组织病理学为参考,评价基于血液循环肿瘤DNA检测在普通危险人群中检测结直肠癌的临床应用价值。设计、环境和参与者:前瞻性、多中心、横断面观察性研究,纳入2020年5月至2022年4月的参与者,年龄在45至85岁之间,结直肠癌平均风险,愿意接受标准护理筛查结肠镜检查的无症状成年人。参与者、工作人员和病理学家对血液检查结果不知情,实验室检查对结肠镜检查结果不知情。这项研究是在美国49个州和阿拉伯联合酋长国的201个中心进行的。采血方法采用定点采血和移动式采血。暴露:参与者被要求在采血后完成结肠镜筛查。主要结局和指标:主要终点为对结直肠癌的敏感性、对晚期结直肠癌或晚期癌前病变的特异性、对晚期结直肠癌的阴性预测值、对晚期结直肠癌的阳性预测值。次要终点是对晚期癌前病变的敏感性。结果:可评估队列参与者的中位年龄(n = 27 010)为57.0岁,55.8%为女性。结直肠癌的敏感性为79.2% (57/72;95% CI, 68.4%-86.9%),晚期结直肠肿瘤的特异性为91.5%(22 306/24 371;95% ci, 91.2%-91.9%)。晚期结直肠肿瘤的阴性预测值为90.8%(22 306/24 567;95% CI, 90.7%-90.9%),晚期结直肠肿瘤的阳性预测值为15.5% (378/2443;95% ci, 14.2%-16.8%)。所有主要终点均符合预先规定的验收标准。对晚期癌前病变的敏感性为12.5% (321/2567;95% CI, 11.3%-13.8%),不符合预先规定的接受标准。结论和相关性:在平均风险的结直肠癌筛查人群中,基于血液的检测显示出可接受的结直肠癌检测准确性,但晚期癌前病变的检测仍然是一个挑战,需要不断努力提高检测灵敏度。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04369053。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
1569
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. It has been published continuously since 1883. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信