Sustainable and available sources of omega-3 fatty acids for health: are the current dietary recommendations, food sources and legislation fit for purpose?

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Eva Lewis, Simon Steenson, Richard P Haslam, Emma McDonald, Matthew Sharman, Maria Traka, Alice Stanton, Johnathan A Napier, Anna Sweeting, Rasha N M Saleh, Michael Hornberger, Ian Givens, Philip C Calder, Anne M Minihane
{"title":"Sustainable and available sources of omega-3 fatty acids for health: are the current dietary recommendations, food sources and legislation fit for purpose?","authors":"Eva Lewis, Simon Steenson, Richard P Haslam, Emma McDonald, Matthew Sharman, Maria Traka, Alice Stanton, Johnathan A Napier, Anna Sweeting, Rasha N M Saleh, Michael Hornberger, Ian Givens, Philip C Calder, Anne M Minihane","doi":"10.1017/S0954422425100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The health benefits of the long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have been known for over 50 years and underpin the UK population recommendation to consume >450 mg EPA + DHA per day. These recommendations, last revised in 2004, are based mainly on epidemiological evidence. Much research has been conducted in the interim. Most randomised controlled trials (RCT) use doses of EPA + DHA of 840 mg/d or more. For anti-inflammatory, triacylglycerol-lowering and anti-hypertensive effects, >1.5 g EPA + DHA per day is needed. Cognitive benefits are also likely to require these higher intakes. Farmed salmon now contains considerably less EPA + DHA relative to farmed fish of 20 years ago, meaning one portion per week will no longer provide the equivalent of 450 mg EPA + DHA per day. Oily fish alone can only provide a fraction of the EPA + DHA required to meet global needs. Furthermore, there is low global oily fish consumption, with typical intakes of <200 mg EPA + DHA per day, and limited intakes in vegans and vegetarians. Therefore, there is an urgent need for affordable, acceptable, alternative EPA + DHA sources, including vegan/vegetarian friendly options, such as bio-enriched poultry, red meat and milk products; fortified foods; enriched oilseeds (for example, genetically modified <i>Camelina sativa</i>); algae and algal oils; and approaches which enhance endogenous EPA/DHA synthesis. In this narrative review, we suggest that current EPA + DHA intake recommendations are too low, consider EPA/DHA from a holistic health-sustainability perspective and identify research, policy and knowledge mobilisation areas which need attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54703,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422425100127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The health benefits of the long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have been known for over 50 years and underpin the UK population recommendation to consume >450 mg EPA + DHA per day. These recommendations, last revised in 2004, are based mainly on epidemiological evidence. Much research has been conducted in the interim. Most randomised controlled trials (RCT) use doses of EPA + DHA of 840 mg/d or more. For anti-inflammatory, triacylglycerol-lowering and anti-hypertensive effects, >1.5 g EPA + DHA per day is needed. Cognitive benefits are also likely to require these higher intakes. Farmed salmon now contains considerably less EPA + DHA relative to farmed fish of 20 years ago, meaning one portion per week will no longer provide the equivalent of 450 mg EPA + DHA per day. Oily fish alone can only provide a fraction of the EPA + DHA required to meet global needs. Furthermore, there is low global oily fish consumption, with typical intakes of <200 mg EPA + DHA per day, and limited intakes in vegans and vegetarians. Therefore, there is an urgent need for affordable, acceptable, alternative EPA + DHA sources, including vegan/vegetarian friendly options, such as bio-enriched poultry, red meat and milk products; fortified foods; enriched oilseeds (for example, genetically modified Camelina sativa); algae and algal oils; and approaches which enhance endogenous EPA/DHA synthesis. In this narrative review, we suggest that current EPA + DHA intake recommendations are too low, consider EPA/DHA from a holistic health-sustainability perspective and identify research, policy and knowledge mobilisation areas which need attention.

可持续和可用的omega-3脂肪酸来源对健康:目前的饮食建议、食物来源和立法是否符合目的?
长链omega-3 PUFA、二十碳五烯酸(EPA)和二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)对健康的益处已经被认识了50多年,英国人建议每天摄入450毫克EPA+DHA。这些建议上一次修订是在2004年,主要基于流行病学证据。在此期间进行了大量的研究。大多数随机对照试验使用的EPA+DHA剂量为每天840毫克或更多。为了抗炎、降低甘油三酯和降压,每天需要1.5克EPA+DHA。认知益处也可能需要这些更高的摄入量。与野生鱼类和20年前的养殖鱼类相比,养殖鲑鱼现在所含的EPA+DHA要少得多,这意味着每周一份鲑鱼将不再提供相当于每天450毫克的EPA+DHA。油性鱼类本身只能提供满足全球需求所需的EPA+DHA的一小部分。此外,全球油性鱼类的消费量很低,每天的典型摄入量< 200毫克EPA+DHA,纯素食者和素食者的摄入量有限。因此,迫切需要一种负担得起的、可接受的替代性EPA+DHA来源,包括纯素/素食友好型选择,如生物富集家禽、红肉和奶制品;强化食品;富含油料的种子,如转基因亚麻荠;藻类和藻类油;以及促进内源性EPA/DHA合成的方法。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们建议目前EPA+DHA的摄入量建议过低,从整体健康可持续性的角度考虑EPA/DHA,并确定需要关注的研究、政策和知识动员领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Research Reviews
Nutrition Research Reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research Reviews offers a comprehensive overview of nutritional science today. By distilling the latest research and linking it to established practice, the journal consistently delivers the widest range of in-depth articles in the field of nutritional science. It presents up-to-date, critical reviews of key topics in nutrition science advancing new concepts and hypotheses that encourage the exchange of fundamental ideas on nutritional well-being in both humans and animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信