County-level socioeconomic, race-ethnicity, household, and infrastructure vulnerability associations with bone cancer treatment and prognosis in the US

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
David J. Fei-Zhang , Erik B. Gerlach , Shyam Chandrasekar , Mark A. Plantz , Nicholas C. Arpey , Peter R. Swiatek , David R. Christian , Bejan A. Alvandi , Corey A. Jones , Ruohui Chen , Seth M. Pollack , Terrance D. Peabody
{"title":"County-level socioeconomic, race-ethnicity, household, and infrastructure vulnerability associations with bone cancer treatment and prognosis in the US","authors":"David J. Fei-Zhang ,&nbsp;Erik B. Gerlach ,&nbsp;Shyam Chandrasekar ,&nbsp;Mark A. Plantz ,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Arpey ,&nbsp;Peter R. Swiatek ,&nbsp;David R. Christian ,&nbsp;Bejan A. Alvandi ,&nbsp;Corey A. Jones ,&nbsp;Ruohui Chen ,&nbsp;Seth M. Pollack ,&nbsp;Terrance D. Peabody","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><div>The impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on primary bone cancer (PBC) treatment and clinical outcomes has seen little inquiry due to restrictive study designs of narrow histology scopes, limited SDoH-factors assessed, and lacking geographic-span of study populations.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess how varied SDoH impact the surveillance, survival, and treatment of adults with PBCs in the US by quantifying the associations of the summative and individual influences of SDoH-vulnerability with outcome disparities.</div></div><div><h3>Design, setting, participants</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study on adult PBC patients between 1975 and 2017 from the Surveillance-Epidemiology-End Results Program (SEER) database. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to January 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Exposures</h3><div>Overall social vulnerability and its subcomponents comprised of 15 SDoH-factors in 4 themes of socioeconomic status (poverty, unemployment, income, high school education), minority-language (minoritized race/ethnicity, English proficiency), household composition (disability status, family members &lt;18 or 65 + years, single-parent status) and housing-transportation (multiunit-mobile dwelling, overcrowding, vehicle access, group quarters) status and their total composite.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcomes and measures</h3><div>Regression trends were used for SDoH-vulnerability associations with follow-up/surveillance period, survival period, and treatment receipt across PBCs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For 13,664 PBC patients, increasing total social vulnerability was associated with significant decreases in surveillance period for chondrosarcomas, chordomas, Ewing sarcoma, malignant giant cell tumors, NOS Malignant Neoplasms, NOS or other Sarcomas, and osteosarcomas, ranging from 20.62 % to 51.07 % in relative decreases. Survival period decreases were observed with chondrosarcomas (44.08 %) and chordomas (31.30 %) when overall social vulnerability increased. Decreased receipt of recommended surgery (lowest, NOS or other sarcomas: OR 0.86; 95 %CI 0.76–0.97) and radiation therapy (lowest, Ewing Sarcoma: OR 0.89; 95 %CI 0.81–0.98) for several histology types was also observed with increasing total social vulnerability. Socioeconomic status, followed closely by housing-transportation and minority-language status vulnerabilities largely comprised these overall detrimental trends.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall social vulnerability showed significant decreases in care receipt and worsened prognosis for PBC patients while quantifiably characterizing which factors disproportionately associated with detrimental trends, informing providers which SDoH should be addressed to more effectively combat PBC disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"108 ","pages":"Pages 26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104727972500105X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance

The impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on primary bone cancer (PBC) treatment and clinical outcomes has seen little inquiry due to restrictive study designs of narrow histology scopes, limited SDoH-factors assessed, and lacking geographic-span of study populations.

Objectives

To assess how varied SDoH impact the surveillance, survival, and treatment of adults with PBCs in the US by quantifying the associations of the summative and individual influences of SDoH-vulnerability with outcome disparities.

Design, setting, participants

This retrospective cohort study on adult PBC patients between 1975 and 2017 from the Surveillance-Epidemiology-End Results Program (SEER) database. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to January 2024.

Exposures

Overall social vulnerability and its subcomponents comprised of 15 SDoH-factors in 4 themes of socioeconomic status (poverty, unemployment, income, high school education), minority-language (minoritized race/ethnicity, English proficiency), household composition (disability status, family members <18 or 65 + years, single-parent status) and housing-transportation (multiunit-mobile dwelling, overcrowding, vehicle access, group quarters) status and their total composite.

Main outcomes and measures

Regression trends were used for SDoH-vulnerability associations with follow-up/surveillance period, survival period, and treatment receipt across PBCs.

Results

For 13,664 PBC patients, increasing total social vulnerability was associated with significant decreases in surveillance period for chondrosarcomas, chordomas, Ewing sarcoma, malignant giant cell tumors, NOS Malignant Neoplasms, NOS or other Sarcomas, and osteosarcomas, ranging from 20.62 % to 51.07 % in relative decreases. Survival period decreases were observed with chondrosarcomas (44.08 %) and chordomas (31.30 %) when overall social vulnerability increased. Decreased receipt of recommended surgery (lowest, NOS or other sarcomas: OR 0.86; 95 %CI 0.76–0.97) and radiation therapy (lowest, Ewing Sarcoma: OR 0.89; 95 %CI 0.81–0.98) for several histology types was also observed with increasing total social vulnerability. Socioeconomic status, followed closely by housing-transportation and minority-language status vulnerabilities largely comprised these overall detrimental trends.

Conclusions

Overall social vulnerability showed significant decreases in care receipt and worsened prognosis for PBC patients while quantifiably characterizing which factors disproportionately associated with detrimental trends, informing providers which SDoH should be addressed to more effectively combat PBC disparities.
美国县级社会经济、人种、家庭和基础设施脆弱性与骨癌治疗和预后的关系
重要性:健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)对原发性骨癌(PBC)治疗和临床结果的影响很少被调查,这是由于限制性的研究设计,狭窄的组织学范围,有限的SDoH因素评估,以及缺乏研究人群的地理跨度。目的:通过量化SDoH脆弱性的总体和个体影响与结果差异之间的关联,评估不同的SDoH如何影响美国PBCs成人的监测、生存和治疗。设计、环境、参与者:本研究对1975-2017年间来自监测-流行病学-最终结果计划(SEER)数据库的成年PBC患者进行回顾性队列研究。数据分析时间为2022年11月至2024年1月。暴露:总体社会脆弱性及其子成分由社会经济地位(贫困、失业、收入、高中教育程度)、少数民族语言(少数民族/民族、英语熟练程度)、家庭组成(残疾状况、家庭成员)4个主题的15个sdoh因素组成。主要结果和措施:使用回归趋势分析sdoh脆弱性与各PBCs随访/监测期、生存期和治疗接受情况的关联。结果:在13664例PBC患者中,总社会脆弱性增加与软骨肉瘤、脊索瘤、尤文氏肉瘤、恶性巨细胞瘤、NOS恶性肿瘤、NOS或其他肉瘤、骨肉瘤的监测期显著减少相关,相对减少幅度为20.62-51.07%。当整体社会脆弱性增加时,软骨肉瘤(44.08%)和脊索瘤(31.30%)的生存期缩短。减少接受推荐手术(最低,NOS或其他肉瘤:or 0.86;95%CI 0.76-0.97)和放射治疗(最低,Ewing肉瘤:OR 0.89;95%CI 0.81-0.98)也观察到随着总社会脆弱性的增加。社会经济地位,紧随其后的住房-交通和少数民族语言地位脆弱性在很大程度上构成了这些总体不利趋势。结论:整体社会脆弱性显示PBC患者的护理接受率显著降低,预后恶化,同时定量表征哪些因素与有害趋势不成比例地相关,告知提供者应该解决哪些SDoH问题以更有效地消除PBC差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信