Effect of apical clearance rigid corneal contact lens fitting on keratoconus progression: a controlled longitudinal analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tsung-Hsien Tsai, Jui-Hung Hsu, Chi-Chin Sun, Ching-Hsi Hsiao, Jiahn-Shing Lee, Ken-Kuo Lin
{"title":"Effect of apical clearance rigid corneal contact lens fitting on keratoconus progression: a controlled longitudinal analysis.","authors":"Tsung-Hsien Tsai, Jui-Hung Hsu, Chi-Chin Sun, Ching-Hsi Hsiao, Jiahn-Shing Lee, Ken-Kuo Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of apical clearance rigid corneal contact lens (RCCL) fitting on keratoconus (KC) progression compared to untreated KC patients over a 12-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, controlled longitudinal study included 237 eyes with KC from two centers between 2018 and 2023. Following propensity score matching for baseline age and maximum keratometry (K<sub>max</sub>), 31 eyes each were assigned to untreated and RCCL groups. RCCLs were fitted using the apical clearance method. Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Scheimpflug corneal tomography and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). KC progression was defined by any of the following: an increase in K<sub>max</sub> or anterior steep keratometry (K2) of >1.0 D, a decrease in thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) of > 10 μm, or a loss of >1 line of BCVA. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in BCVA, tomographic indices, or HOAs were observed between the untreated and RCCL groups at baseline or during follow-up at 3 and 12 months (all p > 0.05). KC progression rates were comparable between the groups, occurring in 12.9 % of untreated eyes and 19.35 % of RCCL treated eyes by 12 months (p = 0.731). GEE analysis revealed a significant reduction in K2 at 3 months within the RCCL group (p = 0.003); however, no other significant longitudinal differences were detected within or between groups at any follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Apical clearance RCCL fitting did not significantly affect overall KC progression compared with no treatment over 12 months. However, the significant reduction in K2 at 3 months in the RCCL group suggests that one week of contact lens discontinuation may not be sufficient for the cornea to fully return to its natural state.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of apical clearance rigid corneal contact lens (RCCL) fitting on keratoconus (KC) progression compared to untreated KC patients over a 12-month period.

Methods: This retrospective, controlled longitudinal study included 237 eyes with KC from two centers between 2018 and 2023. Following propensity score matching for baseline age and maximum keratometry (Kmax), 31 eyes each were assigned to untreated and RCCL groups. RCCLs were fitted using the apical clearance method. Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Scheimpflug corneal tomography and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). KC progression was defined by any of the following: an increase in Kmax or anterior steep keratometry (K2) of >1.0 D, a decrease in thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) of > 10 μm, or a loss of >1 line of BCVA. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE).

Results: No significant differences in BCVA, tomographic indices, or HOAs were observed between the untreated and RCCL groups at baseline or during follow-up at 3 and 12 months (all p > 0.05). KC progression rates were comparable between the groups, occurring in 12.9 % of untreated eyes and 19.35 % of RCCL treated eyes by 12 months (p = 0.731). GEE analysis revealed a significant reduction in K2 at 3 months within the RCCL group (p = 0.003); however, no other significant longitudinal differences were detected within or between groups at any follow-up period.

Conclusion: Apical clearance RCCL fitting did not significantly affect overall KC progression compared with no treatment over 12 months. However, the significant reduction in K2 at 3 months in the RCCL group suggests that one week of contact lens discontinuation may not be sufficient for the cornea to fully return to its natural state.

根尖间隙硬性角膜接触镜配戴对圆锥角膜进展的影响:一项纵向对照分析。
目的:评估顶间隙硬性角膜接触镜(RCCL)配戴对圆锥角膜(KC)进展的影响,并与未治疗的KC患者进行比较。方法:本回顾性、对照纵向研究包括2018年至2023年来自两个中心的237只KC眼。根据基线年龄和最大角膜度数(Kmax)的倾向评分匹配,各31只眼睛被分配到未治疗组和RCCL组。采用根尖间隙法拟合rccl。基线、3、6和12个月的评估包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、Scheimpflug角膜断层扫描和高阶像差(HOAs)。KC进展通过以下任何一项来定义:Kmax或前角陡角膜密度(K2)增加>.0 D,最薄角膜厚度(TCT)减少> 10 μm,或BCVA失去>1线。采用广义估计方程(GEE)分析纵向变化。结果:治疗组和RCCL组在基线时或随访3个月和12个月时的BCVA、断层扫描指数或hoa均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。两组间KC进展率具有可比性,12个月时,未治疗组的KC进展率为12.9%,RCCL治疗组的KC进展率为19.35% (p = 0.731)。GEE分析显示,RCCL组在3个月时K2显著降低(p = 0.003);然而,在任何随访期间,在组内或组间均未发现其他显著的纵向差异。结论:与未治疗相比,根尖清除RCCL安装在12个月内对KC的总体进展没有显著影响。然而,在RCCL组中,3个月时K2的显著降低表明,停用隐形眼镜一周可能不足以使角膜完全恢复到自然状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信