Computer vision for evaluating retraction of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing prostatectomy.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Umar Ghaffar, Rikke Olsen, Atharva Deo, Cherine Yang, Jonathan Varghese, Randy G Tsai, John Heard, Eman Dadashian, Carter Prentice, Peter Wager, Runzhuo Ma, Christian Wagner, Geoffrey A Sonn, Alvin C Goh, Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez, Andrew J Hung
{"title":"Computer vision for evaluating retraction of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing prostatectomy.","authors":"Umar Ghaffar, Rikke Olsen, Atharva Deo, Cherine Yang, Jonathan Varghese, Randy G Tsai, John Heard, Eman Dadashian, Carter Prentice, Peter Wager, Runzhuo Ma, Christian Wagner, Geoffrey A Sonn, Alvin C Goh, Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez, Andrew J Hung","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02412-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nerve-sparing step of prostatectomy is crucial for post-operative sexual recovery, and excessive countertraction on the neurovascular bundle (NVB) during retraction has been associated with adverse sexual function outcomes. Our objective is to utilize computer vision to quantitatively assess the degree of this countertraction to study its impact on post-operative sexual recovery. Sixty-four nerve-sparing prostatectomy videos were used to extract snapshots prior to and at the maximum point of retraction gestures on the NVB. Semantic image segmentation, conducted with the Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT), was used to label features such as the proportion of tissue grasped relative to retractor size and tissue stretch (measured by percent area increase and angular deviation from baseline). Supervised machine learning models, including Random Forest, Multi-layer Perceptron, and XGBoost, were then developed to predict the likelihood of erections sufficient for intercourse at a 12-month post-operative follow-up. Predictions were based on clinical and surgical gesture features (age, PSA, extent of nerve sparing, and post-operative Gleason scores, number of NVB retractions) alone and in combination with segmentation-derived features. One thousand one hundred four instances of NVB retraction were labeled. For patients with insufficient erectile function for intercourse at the 12-month follow-up, the mean angular deviation, percent area increase, and proportion of tissue grasped were 25.80° (SD 13.1), 41.81% (SD 33.3), and 0.310 (SD 0.093), respectively. In contrast, for patients with sufficient erectile function, these values were 21.07° (SD 7.4), 20.10% (SD 12.5), and 0.206 (SD 0.127), respectively. Integrating segmentation-derived features into the models enhanced predictive performance, with the AUC increasing from 0.78 (IQR 0.56-0.98) to 0.83 (IQR 0.63-1.00) for the Random Forest model, from 0.61 (IQR 0.35-0.85) to 0.74 (IQR 0.50-0.94) for the Multi-layer Perceptron, and from 0.70 (IQR 0.44-0.92) to 0.78 (IQR 0.58-0.97) for XGBoost. Delicate handling of the neurovascular bundle is crucial for better post-operative sexual recovery, and computer vision can provide an objective assessment of retraction on the NVB, offering insights beyond clinical and gesture features alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02412-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nerve-sparing step of prostatectomy is crucial for post-operative sexual recovery, and excessive countertraction on the neurovascular bundle (NVB) during retraction has been associated with adverse sexual function outcomes. Our objective is to utilize computer vision to quantitatively assess the degree of this countertraction to study its impact on post-operative sexual recovery. Sixty-four nerve-sparing prostatectomy videos were used to extract snapshots prior to and at the maximum point of retraction gestures on the NVB. Semantic image segmentation, conducted with the Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT), was used to label features such as the proportion of tissue grasped relative to retractor size and tissue stretch (measured by percent area increase and angular deviation from baseline). Supervised machine learning models, including Random Forest, Multi-layer Perceptron, and XGBoost, were then developed to predict the likelihood of erections sufficient for intercourse at a 12-month post-operative follow-up. Predictions were based on clinical and surgical gesture features (age, PSA, extent of nerve sparing, and post-operative Gleason scores, number of NVB retractions) alone and in combination with segmentation-derived features. One thousand one hundred four instances of NVB retraction were labeled. For patients with insufficient erectile function for intercourse at the 12-month follow-up, the mean angular deviation, percent area increase, and proportion of tissue grasped were 25.80° (SD 13.1), 41.81% (SD 33.3), and 0.310 (SD 0.093), respectively. In contrast, for patients with sufficient erectile function, these values were 21.07° (SD 7.4), 20.10% (SD 12.5), and 0.206 (SD 0.127), respectively. Integrating segmentation-derived features into the models enhanced predictive performance, with the AUC increasing from 0.78 (IQR 0.56-0.98) to 0.83 (IQR 0.63-1.00) for the Random Forest model, from 0.61 (IQR 0.35-0.85) to 0.74 (IQR 0.50-0.94) for the Multi-layer Perceptron, and from 0.70 (IQR 0.44-0.92) to 0.78 (IQR 0.58-0.97) for XGBoost. Delicate handling of the neurovascular bundle is crucial for better post-operative sexual recovery, and computer vision can provide an objective assessment of retraction on the NVB, offering insights beyond clinical and gesture features alone.

计算机视觉评估保神经前列腺切除术中神经血管束的回缩。
前列腺切除术的神经保留步骤对术后性功能恢复至关重要,在牵拉过程中对神经血管束(NVB)的过度反牵拉与不良的性功能结果有关。我们的目的是利用计算机视觉定量评估这种反牵引的程度,以研究其对术后性恢复的影响。使用64个保留神经的前列腺切除术视频来提取NVB上收缩手势之前和最大点的快照。使用计算机视觉注释工具(CVAT)进行语义图像分割,用于标记诸如相对于牵开器尺寸和组织拉伸(以面积增加百分比和与基线的角度偏差测量)的组织捕获比例等特征。然后开发了包括随机森林、多层感知器和XGBoost在内的监督机器学习模型,以预测术后12个月随访期间勃起足以进行性交的可能性。预测是基于临床和手术手势特征(年龄、PSA、神经保留程度、术后Gleason评分、NVB牵回次数)单独和结合分割衍生的特征。1104例NVB撤回被标记。随访12个月时勃起功能不全患者,平均角度偏差25.80°(SD 13.1),面积增加百分比41.81% (SD 33.3),抓握组织比例0.310 (SD 0.093)。相比之下,对于勃起功能充足的患者,这些值分别为21.07°(SD 7.4)、20.10% (SD 12.5)和0.206°(SD 0.127)。将分割衍生特征集成到模型中增强了预测性能,随机森林模型的AUC从0.78 (IQR 0.56-0.98)增加到0.83 (IQR 0.63-1.00),多层感知器的AUC从0.61 (IQR 0.35-0.85)增加到0.74 (IQR 0.50-0.94), XGBoost的AUC从0.70 (IQR 0.44-0.92)增加到0.78 (IQR 0.58-0.97)。对神经血管束的精细处理对于术后更好的性恢复至关重要,计算机视觉可以提供NVB回缩的客观评估,提供超越临床和手势特征的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信