The influence of the food environment on diet quality: Insights from an extensive household survey in Ethiopia, focusing on women of reproductive age.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Andinet Abera Hailu, Stephen Thornhill, Masresha Tessema, Alebel Bayrau Weldesilassie, Edward Lahiff
{"title":"The influence of the food environment on diet quality: Insights from an extensive household survey in Ethiopia, focusing on women of reproductive age.","authors":"Andinet Abera Hailu, Stephen Thornhill, Masresha Tessema, Alebel Bayrau Weldesilassie, Edward Lahiff","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01097-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Undernutrition is a significant challenge in Ethiopia, where limited dietary diversity and widespread micronutrient deficiencies affect millions, especially women of reproductive age. Although much research has explored dietary gaps and practices, the impact of the food environment (FE) on diet quality remains understudied. This study examines how FE factors influence dietary quality, using a food systems approach to inform sustainable nutrition policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 1,828 households was utilized to assess women's dietary quality using Poisson regression, with food environment (FE) components and socioeconomic variables predicting four indicators: women's diet diversity score (WDDS), fruit and vegetable score (FVS), global dietary quality score (GDQS), and household diet diversity score (HDDS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dietary diversity was low, with fewer than 20% of women meeting the minimum recommendation; however, improvement was observed with higher quality food environments (FE). Starchy staples dominated consumption across all FE, while pulses and dark green leafy vegetables increased in households with medium and high FE. Low household dietary diversity (average 6.23) and a GDQS of 20.7 (far below the maximum of 49) indicate widespread deficiency. Poisson regression (adjusted for socioeconomic covariates) showed that a high FE score significantly predicted better diet quality compared to a low FE score: 27% higher WDDS (exp(β) = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.32, p < 0.001), 43% higher FVS (exp(β) = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.33-1.54, p < 0.001), 5% higher GDQS (exp(β) = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08, p < 0.001), and 48% higher HDDS (exp(β) = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.43-1.54, p < 0.001). The results demonstrate consistent and significant associations between higher food environment (FE) scores and improved diet quality across all four dietary metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the critical influence of food environments-encompassing market food diversity, physical access (e.g., food availability), economic access (e.g., affordability), and supportive infrastructure (e.g., roads, transportation, financial services)-on improving dietary quality among Ethiopian women and household food security. High food prices, socioeconomic disparities, and regional variations limit access to nutrient-rich foods (e.g., fruits, vegetables, animal-sourced products), particularly for low-income households. To enhance dietary quality and health outcomes, policymakers should prioritize interventions that expand diverse food markets, strengthen rural infrastructure (roads, transportation), and improve affordability through targeted economic support and price stabilization, ensuring equitable access to nutritious foods.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01097-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Undernutrition is a significant challenge in Ethiopia, where limited dietary diversity and widespread micronutrient deficiencies affect millions, especially women of reproductive age. Although much research has explored dietary gaps and practices, the impact of the food environment (FE) on diet quality remains understudied. This study examines how FE factors influence dietary quality, using a food systems approach to inform sustainable nutrition policies.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 1,828 households was utilized to assess women's dietary quality using Poisson regression, with food environment (FE) components and socioeconomic variables predicting four indicators: women's diet diversity score (WDDS), fruit and vegetable score (FVS), global dietary quality score (GDQS), and household diet diversity score (HDDS).

Results: Dietary diversity was low, with fewer than 20% of women meeting the minimum recommendation; however, improvement was observed with higher quality food environments (FE). Starchy staples dominated consumption across all FE, while pulses and dark green leafy vegetables increased in households with medium and high FE. Low household dietary diversity (average 6.23) and a GDQS of 20.7 (far below the maximum of 49) indicate widespread deficiency. Poisson regression (adjusted for socioeconomic covariates) showed that a high FE score significantly predicted better diet quality compared to a low FE score: 27% higher WDDS (exp(β) = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.32, p < 0.001), 43% higher FVS (exp(β) = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.33-1.54, p < 0.001), 5% higher GDQS (exp(β) = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08, p < 0.001), and 48% higher HDDS (exp(β) = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.43-1.54, p < 0.001). The results demonstrate consistent and significant associations between higher food environment (FE) scores and improved diet quality across all four dietary metrics.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the critical influence of food environments-encompassing market food diversity, physical access (e.g., food availability), economic access (e.g., affordability), and supportive infrastructure (e.g., roads, transportation, financial services)-on improving dietary quality among Ethiopian women and household food security. High food prices, socioeconomic disparities, and regional variations limit access to nutrient-rich foods (e.g., fruits, vegetables, animal-sourced products), particularly for low-income households. To enhance dietary quality and health outcomes, policymakers should prioritize interventions that expand diverse food markets, strengthen rural infrastructure (roads, transportation), and improve affordability through targeted economic support and price stabilization, ensuring equitable access to nutritious foods.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

食品环境对饮食质量的影响:来自埃塞俄比亚广泛家庭调查的见解,重点是育龄妇女。
背景:营养不足是埃塞俄比亚面临的一个重大挑战,在埃塞俄比亚,有限的饮食多样性和广泛的微量营养素缺乏影响着数百万人,特别是育龄妇女。尽管许多研究已经探索了饮食差距和实践,但食物环境(FE)对饮食质量的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究考察了FE因素如何影响膳食质量,利用粮食系统方法为可持续营养政策提供信息。方法:采用横截面调查方法对1828户家庭的女性膳食质量进行泊松回归评价,利用食品环境(FE)成分和社会经济变量预测女性膳食多样性评分(WDDS)、水果和蔬菜评分(FVS)、全球膳食质量评分(GDQS)和家庭膳食多样性评分(HDDS) 4个指标。结果:膳食多样性较低,只有不到20%的女性符合最低建议;然而,高质量的食物环境(FE)观察到改善。淀粉类主食在所有FE家庭中占主导地位,而豆类和深绿色叶蔬菜在中等和高FE家庭中增加。家庭膳食多样性低(平均为6.23)和GDQS为20.7(远低于49的最大值)表明普遍缺乏营养。泊松回归(经社会经济协变量调整)显示,与低FE评分相比,高FE评分显著预测更好的饮食质量:WDDS高27% (exp(β) = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.32, p)。本研究证明了粮食环境——包括市场粮食多样性、物质获取(如粮食供应)、经济获取(如可负担性)和支持性基础设施(如道路、交通、金融服务)——对改善埃塞俄比亚妇女饮食质量和家庭粮食安全的关键影响。高粮价、社会经济差异和地区差异限制了获取营养丰富的食物(如水果、蔬菜、动物源产品)的机会,特别是低收入家庭。为提高饮食质量和健康成果,政策制定者应优先采取干预措施,扩大多样化的粮食市场,加强农村基础设施(道路、交通),并通过有针对性的经济支持和价格稳定提高可负担性,确保公平获得营养食品。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信