Effectiveness of Digital Intervention for Tobacco Cessation Among Adults: A Systematic Review.

Addiction and Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-29 DOI:10.34172/ahj.1566
Milind Wasnik, Bhavna Dave, Virendra Vadher
{"title":"Effectiveness of Digital Intervention for Tobacco Cessation Among Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Milind Wasnik, Bhavna Dave, Virendra Vadher","doi":"10.34172/ahj.1566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of tobacco continues to pose a major public health issue worldwide, requiring effective cessation programs. Digital interventions present advantageous opportunities owing to their accessibility and scalability. This systematic review seeks to consolidate current research on the efficacy of digital interventions for tobacco cessation in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a search utilizing pertinent keywords and databases. The search approach encompassed terms including \"digital interventions,\" \"smoking cessation,\" \"adults,\" and their permutations. Our primary focus was on academic databases including PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane, and specialized journals pertaining to public health and smoking cessation. Search terms were limited to the English language exclusively. Databases from 2013 to 2023 were covered. Two writers independently collected data on cessation results and evaluated the likelihood of bias. A random effects meta-analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Following the search, 305 articles were identified. After omitting 151 duplicates, 198 unique papers were analyzed. Of the 47 publications that underwent full-text examination, 8 were finally incorporated into this analysis. Subgroup analysis examined differences in intervention efficacy according to length, intervention type, and participant attributes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital treatments demonstrate the potential to facilitate smoke cessation in adults. Nonetheless, disparities in intervention design and participant attributes affect their efficacy. Additional studies are necessary to clarify effective intervention tactics and fill literature gaps, especially for long-term results and the scalability of digital therapies across varied populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":33943,"journal":{"name":"Addiction and Health","volume":"17 ","pages":"1566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ahj.1566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of tobacco continues to pose a major public health issue worldwide, requiring effective cessation programs. Digital interventions present advantageous opportunities owing to their accessibility and scalability. This systematic review seeks to consolidate current research on the efficacy of digital interventions for tobacco cessation in adults.

Methods: We performed a search utilizing pertinent keywords and databases. The search approach encompassed terms including "digital interventions," "smoking cessation," "adults," and their permutations. Our primary focus was on academic databases including PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane, and specialized journals pertaining to public health and smoking cessation. Search terms were limited to the English language exclusively. Databases from 2013 to 2023 were covered. Two writers independently collected data on cessation results and evaluated the likelihood of bias. A random effects meta-analysis was performed.

Findings: Following the search, 305 articles were identified. After omitting 151 duplicates, 198 unique papers were analyzed. Of the 47 publications that underwent full-text examination, 8 were finally incorporated into this analysis. Subgroup analysis examined differences in intervention efficacy according to length, intervention type, and participant attributes.

Conclusion: Digital treatments demonstrate the potential to facilitate smoke cessation in adults. Nonetheless, disparities in intervention design and participant attributes affect their efficacy. Additional studies are necessary to clarify effective intervention tactics and fill literature gaps, especially for long-term results and the scalability of digital therapies across varied populations.

数字干预对成人戒烟的有效性:一项系统综述。
背景:烟草的使用继续在世界范围内构成一个重大的公共卫生问题,需要有效的戒烟计划。数字干预由于其可及性和可扩展性而提供了有利的机会。本系统综述旨在巩固目前关于数字干预措施对成人戒烟效果的研究。方法:利用相关关键词和数据库进行检索。搜索方法包括“数字干预”、“戒烟”、“成年人”及其排列。我们的主要重点是学术数据库,包括PubMed、EBSCO、Cochrane和与公共卫生和戒烟有关的专业期刊。搜索条件仅限于英语语言。涵盖了2013年至2023年的数据库。两位作者独立收集了戒烟结果的数据,并评估了偏倚的可能性。进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:在检索之后,确定了305篇文章。在剔除151篇重复论文后,分析了198篇独特的论文。在接受全文检查的47份出版物中,有8份最终纳入本分析。亚组分析根据干预时间长短、干预类型和参与者属性来检验干预效果的差异。结论:数字治疗显示了促进成人戒烟的潜力。然而,干预设计和参与者属性的差异影响了干预的效果。需要进一步的研究来阐明有效的干预策略并填补文献空白,特别是对于不同人群的长期结果和数字疗法的可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信