12-Month Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Trial Investigating Effects of IVIG on Top of rATG Versus rATG Alone in Pre-Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: The INHIBIT Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2025.14312
Ondrej Viklicky, Ivan Zahradka, Jan Mares, Janka Slatinska, Alena Parikova, Vojtech Petr, Matej Roder, Katerina Jaklova, Klara Osickova, Libor Janousek, Petra Hruba
{"title":"12-Month Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Trial Investigating Effects of IVIG on Top of rATG Versus rATG Alone in Pre-Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: The INHIBIT Study.","authors":"Ondrej Viklicky, Ivan Zahradka, Jan Mares, Janka Slatinska, Alena Parikova, Vojtech Petr, Matej Roder, Katerina Jaklova, Klara Osickova, Libor Janousek, Petra Hruba","doi":"10.3389/ti.2025.14312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are commonly used in peri-transplant desensitization, but evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. We conducted a prospective, randomized single-center, open-label, Phase IIIb non-inferiority clinical pilot trial to compare the efficacy of IVIG (administered at a dose of 3 × 0.5 g/kg) versus no IVIG, in conjunction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (5-7 mg/kg) induction, in pre-sensitized patients with donor-specific antibodies who had negative pre-transplantation Flow- and CDC-crossmatches, between July 2020 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of efficacy failure, defined as biopsy-proven rejection within 12-month post-transplant. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of rejection at protocol biopsies, evaluated by histology and biopsy-based transcripts diagnostics. Of the screened patients, 53 (72.6%) were excluded due to crossmatch positivity. Ten patients were randomized to the IVIG+, and 7 to the IVIG-arm. The trial was prematurely terminated due to futility at interim analysis. In the IVIG-arm, 3 patients (43%) experienced the primary endpoint compared to none in the IVIG+ arm (p = 0.026). MMDx identified one molecular ABMR in the IVIG+ and 2 in the IVIG-arm in 12-month protocol biopsies. There was one graft loss in the IVIG-arm. The results of this pilot study, although not definitive, do not support the use of IVIG-sparing regimens in HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation (NCT04302805). This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04302805.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"38 ","pages":"14312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2025.14312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are commonly used in peri-transplant desensitization, but evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. We conducted a prospective, randomized single-center, open-label, Phase IIIb non-inferiority clinical pilot trial to compare the efficacy of IVIG (administered at a dose of 3 × 0.5 g/kg) versus no IVIG, in conjunction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (5-7 mg/kg) induction, in pre-sensitized patients with donor-specific antibodies who had negative pre-transplantation Flow- and CDC-crossmatches, between July 2020 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of efficacy failure, defined as biopsy-proven rejection within 12-month post-transplant. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of rejection at protocol biopsies, evaluated by histology and biopsy-based transcripts diagnostics. Of the screened patients, 53 (72.6%) were excluded due to crossmatch positivity. Ten patients were randomized to the IVIG+, and 7 to the IVIG-arm. The trial was prematurely terminated due to futility at interim analysis. In the IVIG-arm, 3 patients (43%) experienced the primary endpoint compared to none in the IVIG+ arm (p = 0.026). MMDx identified one molecular ABMR in the IVIG+ and 2 in the IVIG-arm in 12-month protocol biopsies. There was one graft loss in the IVIG-arm. The results of this pilot study, although not definitive, do not support the use of IVIG-sparing regimens in HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation (NCT04302805). This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04302805.

一项前瞻性随机试验的12个月结果:在预致敏肾移植受者中,IVIG对rATG的影响与单独使用rATG的影响:抑制研究
静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)通常用于移植期脱敏,但支持其疗效的证据有限。我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、IIIb期非劣效性临床试验,比较IVIG(给药剂量为3 × 0.5 g/kg)与不使用IVIG联合兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(5-7 mg/kg)诱导在移植前Flow和dc交叉匹配阴性的供体特异性抗体预致敏患者中的疗效。主要终点是疗效失败率,定义为移植后12个月内活检证实的排斥反应。次要终点包括方案活检的排斥发生率,通过组织学和基于活检的转录本诊断进行评估。在筛选的患者中,53例(72.6%)因交叉匹配阳性而被排除。10例患者随机分到IVIG+组,7例分到IVIG-组。由于中期分析无效,试验提前终止。在IVIG组中,3名患者(43%)经历了主要终点,而IVIG+组中没有患者经历主要终点(p = 0.026)。MMDx在12个月的方案活检中发现IVIG+组有1个分子ABMR, IVIG组有2个分子ABMR。ivig组有一例移植物丢失。这项初步研究的结果,虽然不是明确的,但不支持在hla不相容的肾移植中使用保留ivig方案(NCT04302805)。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,标识符为NCT04302805。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信