{"title":"Staging Lumbar Spondylolysis in Adolescents: Can MR Bone Imaging Replace CT?","authors":"Kohei Okuyama, Yasuchika Aoki, Satoshi Maki, Yukio Matsushita, Takeshi Toyooka, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Shiro Sugiura, Masahiro Inoue, Takayuki Sakai, Yasuhiro Shiga, Takashi Hozumi, Seiji Ohtori, Satoru Nishikawa","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, single-center, observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic reliability of magnetic resonance (MR) Bone Imaging in stage classification of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis, assessing its clinical applicability as an alternative to computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The diagnosis of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis typically requires CT; however, concerns regarding medical radiation exposure have been raised. With recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology, MR bone imaging has been developed, enabling the acquisition of CT-like images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 116 adolescent patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylolysis between August 2022 and April 2024. In addition to conventional MRI, MR Bone Imaging and CT scans were performed on the affected vertebrae. Two independent raters assessed sagittal images and classified the fractures using the Oba classification system. MRI examinations were performed using either a 1.5T or 3T scanners. For statistical analysis, CT classification was used as the reference standard. Inter-rater and inter-modality agreements for both CT and MR Bone Imaging were evaluated using the weighted kappa coefficient (linear weights).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 116 patients, 70 cases (140 pars) underwent 3T MRI, while 46 cases (92 pars) underwent 1.5T MRI. In the 3T MRI group, the inter-rater agreement was κ=0.98 for CT and κ=0.91 for MR Bone Imaging, while inter-modality agreement was κ=0.89 for Rater A and κ=0.83 for Rater B. In the 1.5T MRI group, inter-rater agreement was κ=0.94 for CT and κ=0.92 for MR Bone Imaging, while inter-modality agreement was κ=0.83 for Rater A and κ=0.84 for Rater B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate that MR Bone Imaging provides stage classification accuracy comparable to that of CT in the evaluation of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis. Furthermore, similar findings were observed for both 1.5T and 3T MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective, single-center, observational study.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic reliability of magnetic resonance (MR) Bone Imaging in stage classification of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis, assessing its clinical applicability as an alternative to computed tomography (CT).
Summary of background data: The diagnosis of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis typically requires CT; however, concerns regarding medical radiation exposure have been raised. With recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology, MR bone imaging has been developed, enabling the acquisition of CT-like images.
Methods: This study included 116 adolescent patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylolysis between August 2022 and April 2024. In addition to conventional MRI, MR Bone Imaging and CT scans were performed on the affected vertebrae. Two independent raters assessed sagittal images and classified the fractures using the Oba classification system. MRI examinations were performed using either a 1.5T or 3T scanners. For statistical analysis, CT classification was used as the reference standard. Inter-rater and inter-modality agreements for both CT and MR Bone Imaging were evaluated using the weighted kappa coefficient (linear weights).
Results: Among the 116 patients, 70 cases (140 pars) underwent 3T MRI, while 46 cases (92 pars) underwent 1.5T MRI. In the 3T MRI group, the inter-rater agreement was κ=0.98 for CT and κ=0.91 for MR Bone Imaging, while inter-modality agreement was κ=0.89 for Rater A and κ=0.83 for Rater B. In the 1.5T MRI group, inter-rater agreement was κ=0.94 for CT and κ=0.92 for MR Bone Imaging, while inter-modality agreement was κ=0.83 for Rater A and κ=0.84 for Rater B.
Conclusion: These results indicate that MR Bone Imaging provides stage classification accuracy comparable to that of CT in the evaluation of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis. Furthermore, similar findings were observed for both 1.5T and 3T MRI.
期刊介绍：
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
