Automated Classification of Cervical Spinal Stenosis using Deep Learning on CT Scans.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005414
Yu-Long Zhang, Jia-Wei Huang, Kai-Yu Li, Hua-Lin Li, Xin-Xiao Lin, Hao-Bo Ye, Yu-Han Chen, Nai-Feng Tian
{"title":"Automated Classification of Cervical Spinal Stenosis using Deep Learning on CT Scans.","authors":"Yu-Long Zhang, Jia-Wei Huang, Kai-Yu Li, Hua-Lin Li, Xin-Xiao Lin, Hao-Bo Ye, Yu-Han Chen, Nai-Feng Tian","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a computed tomography-based deep learning(DL) model for diagnosing cervical spinal stenosis(CSS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used for diagnosing CSS, its inherent limitations, including prolonged scanning time, limited availability in resource-constrained settings, and contraindications for patients with metallic implants, make computed tomography (CT) a critical alternative in specific clinical scenarios. The development of CT-based DL models for CSS detection holds promise in transcending the diagnostic efficacy limitations of conventional CT imaging, thereby serving as an intelligent auxiliary tool to optimize healthcare resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired CT/MRI images were collected. CT images were divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. The two-stage model architecture employed: (1) a Faster R-CNN-based detection model for localization, annotation, and extraction of regions of interest (ROI); (2) comparison of 16 convolutional neural network (CNN) models for stenosis classification to select the best-performing model. The evaluation metrics included accuracy, F1-score, and Cohen's κ coefficient, with comparisons made against diagnostic results from physicians with varying years of experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the multiclass classification task, four high-performing models (DL1-b0, DL2-121, DL3-101, and DL4-26d) achieved accuracies of 88.74%, 89.40%, 89.40%, and 88.08%, respectively. All models demonstrated >80% consistency with senior physicians and >70% consistency with junior physicians.In the binary classification task, the models achieved accuracies of 94.70%, 96.03%, 96.03%, and 94.70%, respectively. All four models demonstrated consistency rates slightly below 90% with junior physicians. However, when compared with senior physicians, three models (excluding DL4-26d) exhibited consistency rates exceeding 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL model developed in this study demonstrated high accuracy in CT image analysis of CSS, with a diagnostic performance comparable to that of senior physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objective: To develop and validate a computed tomography-based deep learning(DL) model for diagnosing cervical spinal stenosis(CSS).

Summary of background data: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used for diagnosing CSS, its inherent limitations, including prolonged scanning time, limited availability in resource-constrained settings, and contraindications for patients with metallic implants, make computed tomography (CT) a critical alternative in specific clinical scenarios. The development of CT-based DL models for CSS detection holds promise in transcending the diagnostic efficacy limitations of conventional CT imaging, thereby serving as an intelligent auxiliary tool to optimize healthcare resource allocation.

Methods: Paired CT/MRI images were collected. CT images were divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. The two-stage model architecture employed: (1) a Faster R-CNN-based detection model for localization, annotation, and extraction of regions of interest (ROI); (2) comparison of 16 convolutional neural network (CNN) models for stenosis classification to select the best-performing model. The evaluation metrics included accuracy, F1-score, and Cohen's κ coefficient, with comparisons made against diagnostic results from physicians with varying years of experience.

Results: In the multiclass classification task, four high-performing models (DL1-b0, DL2-121, DL3-101, and DL4-26d) achieved accuracies of 88.74%, 89.40%, 89.40%, and 88.08%, respectively. All models demonstrated >80% consistency with senior physicians and >70% consistency with junior physicians.In the binary classification task, the models achieved accuracies of 94.70%, 96.03%, 96.03%, and 94.70%, respectively. All four models demonstrated consistency rates slightly below 90% with junior physicians. However, when compared with senior physicians, three models (excluding DL4-26d) exhibited consistency rates exceeding 90%.

Conclusions: The DL model developed in this study demonstrated high accuracy in CT image analysis of CSS, with a diagnostic performance comparable to that of senior physicians.

基于CT扫描深度学习的颈椎管狭窄自动分类。
研究设计:回顾性研究。目的:建立并验证基于计算机断层扫描的深度学习(DL)模型诊断颈椎管狭窄症(CSS)。背景资料摘要:尽管磁共振成像(MRI)被广泛用于诊断CSS,但其固有的局限性,包括扫描时间长,资源有限的情况下可用性有限,以及金属植入患者的禁忌症,使得计算机断层扫描(CT)在特定的临床情况下成为关键的替代方案。基于CT的CSS检测DL模型的开发有望超越传统CT成像的诊断效果限制,从而作为优化医疗资源配置的智能辅助工具。方法:收集配对CT/MRI图像。将CT图像按8:1:1的比例划分为训练集、验证集和测试集。采用两阶段模型架构:(1)基于更快的r - cnn检测模型,用于定位、标注和提取感兴趣区域(ROI);(2)比较16种卷积神经网络(CNN)狭窄分类模型,选择性能最佳的模型。评估指标包括准确性、f1评分和科恩κ系数,并与具有不同经验的医生的诊断结果进行比较。结果:在多类分类任务中,4个高性能模型(DL1-b0、DL2-121、DL3-101和DL4-26d)的准确率分别为88.74%、89.40%、89.40%和88.08%。所有模型与高级医生的一致性为>80%,与初级医生的一致性为>70%。在二值分类任务中,模型的准确率分别为94.70%、96.03%、96.03%和94.70%。所有四种模型与初级医生的一致性都略低于90%。然而,与资深医师相比,三个模型(不包括DL4-26d)的一致性率超过90%。结论:本研究建立的DL模型对CSS的CT图像分析具有较高的准确性,其诊断性能可与资深医师相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信