{"title":"Semantic Processing of Arabic Numbers Across Tasks.","authors":"Will Deng, Danielle S Dickson, Kara D Federmeier","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numbers are used in a variety of ways and in different contexts-as labels, markers of ordinality, or indicators of quantity, in addresses and phone numbers and in mathematical equations. This raises the question of whether knowledge access from numbers involves similar or distinct mechanisms across these uses and how it compares to accessing knowledge from words and pictures. To investigate this, we presented double-digit numbers in three tasks designed to target different types of information: a matching task requiring access only to number form, a divisor task situating numbers in the context of basic arithmetic, and a quantifier task using numbers to represent everyday quantities. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs), focusing on the N400 component, which has been linked to access from long-term semantic memory, and looking at the impact of repetition as an implicit probe of facilitated knowledge retrieval. Our results revealed reliable N400 repetition effects for numbers across all tasks, suggesting that numbers are linked to associated representations of numerosity in a relatively automatic manner, using similar mechanisms as the access of semantics from words and pictures. However, consistent with claims that representations of numerosity involve different brain networks compared to general semantics, the scalp distribution of the N400 repetition effect for numbers, which was consistent across our three tasks, differed from that to words in the present experiment and from that observed in prior work using numbers to access general semantics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Numbers are used in a variety of ways and in different contexts-as labels, markers of ordinality, or indicators of quantity, in addresses and phone numbers and in mathematical equations. This raises the question of whether knowledge access from numbers involves similar or distinct mechanisms across these uses and how it compares to accessing knowledge from words and pictures. To investigate this, we presented double-digit numbers in three tasks designed to target different types of information: a matching task requiring access only to number form, a divisor task situating numbers in the context of basic arithmetic, and a quantifier task using numbers to represent everyday quantities. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs), focusing on the N400 component, which has been linked to access from long-term semantic memory, and looking at the impact of repetition as an implicit probe of facilitated knowledge retrieval. Our results revealed reliable N400 repetition effects for numbers across all tasks, suggesting that numbers are linked to associated representations of numerosity in a relatively automatic manner, using similar mechanisms as the access of semantics from words and pictures. However, consistent with claims that representations of numerosity involve different brain networks compared to general semantics, the scalp distribution of the N400 repetition effect for numbers, which was consistent across our three tasks, differed from that to words in the present experiment and from that observed in prior work using numbers to access general semantics.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.