Characterization of dysfunctional breathing using cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Sebastian F Möbus, Chris J Harding, Catherine L Taylor, Karl P Sylvester, Jonathan P Fuld
{"title":"Characterization of dysfunctional breathing using cardiopulmonary exercise testing.","authors":"Sebastian F Möbus, Chris J Harding, Catherine L Taylor, Karl P Sylvester, Jonathan P Fuld","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is emerging as a useful tool in the identification of dysfunctional breathing (DB). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and functional impact of different patterns of DB in 628 adult patients referred for CPET due to unexplained dyspnoea (August 2019-December 2023). Patients were assigned to four groups following CPET interpretation: normal, breathing pattern disorder (BPD), hyperventilation (HV), and combined BPD with HV (BPDHV). Demographic and CPET performance data were analyzed using non-parametric tests as appropriate. 94 (15.0%) patients had normal CPETs and 267 (42.5%) were identified as having DB. The remaining 267 were excluded as having alternative diagnoses. Of those with DB, 145 (54.3%) had BPD, 41 (15.4%) had HV, and 81 (30.3%) had BPDHV. VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> was significantly increased in HV or BPDHV only (p < 0.001). Patients in all three DB groups exhibited significantly impaired peak VO<sub>2</sub> compared to those with normal CPETs (p < 0.001). These CPET findings highlight DB as a common driver of symptoms in unexplained dyspnoea. Over half of patients with DB had isolated BPD, which requires visual inspection of relevant CPET plots to diagnose. Those identified with DB had significantly reduced peak VO<sub>2</sub>, which may be a useful classifier of functional severity in DB.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 11","pages":"e70388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is emerging as a useful tool in the identification of dysfunctional breathing (DB). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and functional impact of different patterns of DB in 628 adult patients referred for CPET due to unexplained dyspnoea (August 2019-December 2023). Patients were assigned to four groups following CPET interpretation: normal, breathing pattern disorder (BPD), hyperventilation (HV), and combined BPD with HV (BPDHV). Demographic and CPET performance data were analyzed using non-parametric tests as appropriate. 94 (15.0%) patients had normal CPETs and 267 (42.5%) were identified as having DB. The remaining 267 were excluded as having alternative diagnoses. Of those with DB, 145 (54.3%) had BPD, 41 (15.4%) had HV, and 81 (30.3%) had BPDHV. VE/VCO2 was significantly increased in HV or BPDHV only (p < 0.001). Patients in all three DB groups exhibited significantly impaired peak VO2 compared to those with normal CPETs (p < 0.001). These CPET findings highlight DB as a common driver of symptoms in unexplained dyspnoea. Over half of patients with DB had isolated BPD, which requires visual inspection of relevant CPET plots to diagnose. Those identified with DB had significantly reduced peak VO2, which may be a useful classifier of functional severity in DB.

用心肺运动试验表征呼吸功能障碍。
心肺运动试验(CPET)正在成为识别呼吸功能障碍(DB)的有用工具。我们的目的是评估628例因不明原因呼吸困难(2019年8月- 2023年12月)而接受CPET治疗的成人患者中不同类型DB的患病率和功能影响。根据CPET解释将患者分为四组:正常,呼吸模式障碍(BPD),过度通气(HV)和BPD合并HV (BPDHV)。人口统计学和CPET性能数据采用适当的非参数检验进行分析。94例(15.0%)cpet正常,267例(42.5%)诊断为DB。其余267人因有其他诊断而被排除。在DB患者中,145人(54.3%)患有BPD, 41人(15.4%)患有HV, 81人(30.3%)患有BPDHV。与CPETs正常患者相比,仅HV或BPDHV患者的VE/VCO2显著升高(p < 2),这可能是DB功能严重程度的有用分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信