Efficacy of Intravitreal Ganciclovir Injection with or without Oral Valganciclovir versus Topical 2% Ganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Anterior Segment Infection.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Chu-Yen Huang, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang, Yu-Chun Cheng, Yih-Shiou Hwang, Ching-Hsi Hsiao
{"title":"Efficacy of Intravitreal Ganciclovir Injection with or without Oral Valganciclovir versus Topical 2% Ganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Anterior Segment Infection.","authors":"Chu-Yen Huang, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang, Yu-Chun Cheng, Yih-Shiou Hwang, Ching-Hsi Hsiao","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2508402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the following two treatment approaches for cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior segment infection: 1) intravitreal injection of ganciclovir as a loading dose with or without adjunctive oral valganciclovir and 2) topical application of 2% ganciclovir.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with CMV anterior segment infection. Patients were categorized into two groups. Group 1 comprised patients who received intravitreal injection of ganciclovir as a loading dose with or without adjunctive oral valganciclovir (<i>n</i> = 48), and group 2 comprised patients who received long-term topical 2% ganciclovir treatment (<i>n</i> = 32). The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, and the secondary outcomes were changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recurrence rate over the 2-year follow-up was similar in both group 1 and group 2 (35.4% and 34.4%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 1.0). A Kaplan-Meier plot revealed comparable recurrence-free survival (<i>P</i> for log-rank test = 0.958). Both treatment groups exhibited a notable decrease in IOP. BCVA varied over time; however, no differences were observed between the two groups. In group 1, 39 of 48 patients (81.3%) required adjunctive oral valganciclovir, which was taken for a median duration of 55 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite being a short-term treatment, intravitreal injection of ganciclovir as a loading dose with or without additional oral valganciclovir comparably and effectively prevents recurrence relative to the long-term topical application of 2% ganciclovir.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2508402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of the following two treatment approaches for cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior segment infection: 1) intravitreal injection of ganciclovir as a loading dose with or without adjunctive oral valganciclovir and 2) topical application of 2% ganciclovir.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with CMV anterior segment infection. Patients were categorized into two groups. Group 1 comprised patients who received intravitreal injection of ganciclovir as a loading dose with or without adjunctive oral valganciclovir (n = 48), and group 2 comprised patients who received long-term topical 2% ganciclovir treatment (n = 32). The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, and the secondary outcomes were changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

Results: The recurrence rate over the 2-year follow-up was similar in both group 1 and group 2 (35.4% and 34.4%, respectively; p = 1.0). A Kaplan-Meier plot revealed comparable recurrence-free survival (P for log-rank test = 0.958). Both treatment groups exhibited a notable decrease in IOP. BCVA varied over time; however, no differences were observed between the two groups. In group 1, 39 of 48 patients (81.3%) required adjunctive oral valganciclovir, which was taken for a median duration of 55 days.

Conclusions: Despite being a short-term treatment, intravitreal injection of ganciclovir as a loading dose with or without additional oral valganciclovir comparably and effectively prevents recurrence relative to the long-term topical application of 2% ganciclovir.

更昔洛韦玻璃体内注射加或不加口服缬更昔洛韦与外用2%更昔洛韦治疗巨细胞病毒前段感染的疗效比较
目的:比较巨细胞病毒(CMV)前段感染的两种治疗方法的疗效:1)玻璃体内注射更昔洛韦作为负荷剂量,加或不加口服缬更昔洛韦;2)局部应用2%更昔洛韦。方法:回顾性分析诊断为巨细胞病毒前段感染的患者资料。患者分为两组。第1组患者接受玻璃体内注射更昔洛韦作为负荷剂量,同时或不辅助口服缬更昔洛韦(n = 48),第2组患者长期接受2%局部更昔洛韦治疗(n = 32)。主要终点是无复发生存期,次要终点是眼压(IOP)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化。结果:1、2组2年随访复发率相近,分别为35.4%、34.4%;p = 1.0)。Kaplan-Meier图显示无复发生存率相当(log-rank检验P = 0.958)。两组患者IOP均有明显下降。BCVA随时间变化;然而,两组之间没有观察到差异。在第1组中,48例患者中有39例(81.3%)需要辅助口服缬更昔洛韦,中位持续时间为55天。结论:尽管作为一种短期治疗,相比于长期外用2%的更昔洛韦,玻璃体内注射更昔洛韦作为负荷剂量,加或不加口服缬更昔洛韦,可有效预防复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信