L N Tavares, D C Ferraz, K K Dolenkei, K Zancopé, A C Almeida Silva, L H Raposo
{"title":"Variations in Microstructural, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Different CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Reinforced Glass Ceramics.","authors":"L N Tavares, D C Ferraz, K K Dolenkei, K Zancopé, A C Almeida Silva, L H Raposo","doi":"10.2341/24-133-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared four CAD/CAM lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic systems (IPS e.max CAD, Rosetta SM CAD, T-lithium CAD, and IRIS CAD) regarding their crystalline and microstructural characteristics, thermal properties, mechanical strength, and bonding to a resin cement.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The crystalline and morphological characteristics of the ceramic microstructure were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermal behavior was assessed via differential thermal analysis (DTA). Mechanical properties were evaluated using a biaxial flexural strength test, and bonding to a resin cement was measured with a microshear strength test at distinct storage times. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High peak positions corresponding to standard lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate with similar intensities were observed for all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM morphological analysis showed differences in crystal characteristics among the ceramics after HF etching. The DTA thermograms showed a crystallization process ranging from 812-872°C among the different ceramic systems. The IRIS system showed the lowest flexural strength values, while bond strengths to resin cement remained comparable among materials, regardless of storage time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most lithium disilicate ceramic systems demonstrated acceptable characteristics in the tests performed, except for IRIS, which showed shortcomings in crystal morphology and mechanical strength, along with inconsistent thermal behavior. These findings underscore the importance of careful material selection to ensure durable dental restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"333-344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-133-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared four CAD/CAM lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic systems (IPS e.max CAD, Rosetta SM CAD, T-lithium CAD, and IRIS CAD) regarding their crystalline and microstructural characteristics, thermal properties, mechanical strength, and bonding to a resin cement.
Methods and materials: The crystalline and morphological characteristics of the ceramic microstructure were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermal behavior was assessed via differential thermal analysis (DTA). Mechanical properties were evaluated using a biaxial flexural strength test, and bonding to a resin cement was measured with a microshear strength test at distinct storage times. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05).
Results: High peak positions corresponding to standard lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate with similar intensities were observed for all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM morphological analysis showed differences in crystal characteristics among the ceramics after HF etching. The DTA thermograms showed a crystallization process ranging from 812-872°C among the different ceramic systems. The IRIS system showed the lowest flexural strength values, while bond strengths to resin cement remained comparable among materials, regardless of storage time.
Conclusions: Most lithium disilicate ceramic systems demonstrated acceptable characteristics in the tests performed, except for IRIS, which showed shortcomings in crystal morphology and mechanical strength, along with inconsistent thermal behavior. These findings underscore the importance of careful material selection to ensure durable dental restorations.
期刊介绍:
Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts.
One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use.
The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity