Variations in Microstructural, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Different CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Reinforced Glass Ceramics.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
L N Tavares, D C Ferraz, K K Dolenkei, K Zancopé, A C Almeida Silva, L H Raposo
{"title":"Variations in Microstructural, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Different CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Reinforced Glass Ceramics.","authors":"L N Tavares, D C Ferraz, K K Dolenkei, K Zancopé, A C Almeida Silva, L H Raposo","doi":"10.2341/24-133-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared four CAD/CAM lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic systems (IPS e.max CAD, Rosetta SM CAD, T-lithium CAD, and IRIS CAD) regarding their crystalline and microstructural characteristics, thermal properties, mechanical strength, and bonding to a resin cement.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The crystalline and morphological characteristics of the ceramic microstructure were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermal behavior was assessed via differential thermal analysis (DTA). Mechanical properties were evaluated using a biaxial flexural strength test, and bonding to a resin cement was measured with a microshear strength test at distinct storage times. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High peak positions corresponding to standard lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate with similar intensities were observed for all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM morphological analysis showed differences in crystal characteristics among the ceramics after HF etching. The DTA thermograms showed a crystallization process ranging from 812-872°C among the different ceramic systems. The IRIS system showed the lowest flexural strength values, while bond strengths to resin cement remained comparable among materials, regardless of storage time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most lithium disilicate ceramic systems demonstrated acceptable characteristics in the tests performed, except for IRIS, which showed shortcomings in crystal morphology and mechanical strength, along with inconsistent thermal behavior. These findings underscore the importance of careful material selection to ensure durable dental restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"333-344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-133-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared four CAD/CAM lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic systems (IPS e.max CAD, Rosetta SM CAD, T-lithium CAD, and IRIS CAD) regarding their crystalline and microstructural characteristics, thermal properties, mechanical strength, and bonding to a resin cement.

Methods and materials: The crystalline and morphological characteristics of the ceramic microstructure were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermal behavior was assessed via differential thermal analysis (DTA). Mechanical properties were evaluated using a biaxial flexural strength test, and bonding to a resin cement was measured with a microshear strength test at distinct storage times. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05).

Results: High peak positions corresponding to standard lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate with similar intensities were observed for all ceramics in the XRD analysis. SEM morphological analysis showed differences in crystal characteristics among the ceramics after HF etching. The DTA thermograms showed a crystallization process ranging from 812-872°C among the different ceramic systems. The IRIS system showed the lowest flexural strength values, while bond strengths to resin cement remained comparable among materials, regardless of storage time.

Conclusions: Most lithium disilicate ceramic systems demonstrated acceptable characteristics in the tests performed, except for IRIS, which showed shortcomings in crystal morphology and mechanical strength, along with inconsistent thermal behavior. These findings underscore the importance of careful material selection to ensure durable dental restorations.

不同CAD/CAM技术对二硅酸锂增强玻璃陶瓷显微结构、热性能和力学性能的影响。
目的:本研究比较了四种CAD/CAM二硅酸锂增强玻璃陶瓷系统(IPS e.max CAD、Rosetta SM CAD、T-lithium CAD和IRIS CAD)的晶体和微观结构特征、热性能、机械强度以及与树脂水泥的粘合性。方法和材料:采用x射线衍射(XRD)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究陶瓷微观结构的结晶和形态特征,通过差热分析(DTA)评估其热行为。通过双轴抗折强度测试来评估机械性能,并通过不同储存时间的微剪切强度测试来测量与树脂水泥的粘结性。采用方差分析和Tukey HSD检验对资料进行评价(α = 0.05)。结果:在XRD分析中,所有陶瓷的峰位都与标准偏硅酸锂和二硅酸锂相对应,且强度相似。SEM形态分析表明,经HF腐蚀后的陶瓷晶体特征存在差异。DTA热图显示,不同陶瓷体系的结晶过程在812 ~ 872℃范围内。IRIS系统显示出最低的抗弯强度值,而与树脂水泥的结合强度在不同材料中保持相当,无论储存时间如何。结论:大多数二硅酸锂陶瓷系统在进行的测试中表现出可接受的特性,除了IRIS,它在晶体形态和机械强度方面存在缺点,以及不一致的热行为。这些发现强调了仔细选择材料的重要性,以确保持久的牙齿修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operative dentistry
Operative dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts. One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use. The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信