Detection of antibodies against infectious bronchitis virus strain QX (GI-19) by commercial ELISA kits and virus neutralization test

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Lana Ljuma Skupnjak, Davor Janković, Marina Gabrić Dragović, Anto Vrdoljak, Katarina Huić Babić, Anamarija Slović
{"title":"Detection of antibodies against infectious bronchitis virus strain QX (GI-19) by commercial ELISA kits and virus neutralization test","authors":"Lana Ljuma Skupnjak,&nbsp;Davor Janković,&nbsp;Marina Gabrić Dragović,&nbsp;Anto Vrdoljak,&nbsp;Katarina Huić Babić,&nbsp;Anamarija Slović","doi":"10.1016/j.jviromet.2025.115192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study assessed the suitability of four commercially available IBV ELISA kits for detecting antibodies against the QX strain of IBV in poultry. Two experiments were conducted: one in SPF layers under laboratory conditions and another in broiler chickens under field conditions. Chickens were vaccinated with either a candidate vaccine or existing commercially available vaccines against QX strain of IBV. Sera and tear samples were collected post-vaccination and analysed using various ELISA and virus neutralization tests.</div><div>Results show that all ELISA kits have detected antibodies induced by the candidate vaccine, with antibody levels comparable to or higher than those induced by existing vaccines. The BioChek indirect ELISA kit detected the highest antibody levels in the first experiment, while the ID Screen indirect ELISA kit detected the highest antibody levels in the second experiment. Virus-neutralizing antibodies were found in most vaccinated groups, but not in the unvaccinated control group. Tear samples indicated local antibody development peaking at 28 days post-vaccination.</div><div>Although the antibody levels in the sera of vaccinated chickens do not always correlate with protection against infection, and the role of local antibodies remains controversial, measuring antibodies by ELISA provides an indication of successful vaccination or field challenge. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of establishing a baseline standard for expected titer values through regular serological monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of virological methods","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 115192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of virological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093425000850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study assessed the suitability of four commercially available IBV ELISA kits for detecting antibodies against the QX strain of IBV in poultry. Two experiments were conducted: one in SPF layers under laboratory conditions and another in broiler chickens under field conditions. Chickens were vaccinated with either a candidate vaccine or existing commercially available vaccines against QX strain of IBV. Sera and tear samples were collected post-vaccination and analysed using various ELISA and virus neutralization tests.
Results show that all ELISA kits have detected antibodies induced by the candidate vaccine, with antibody levels comparable to or higher than those induced by existing vaccines. The BioChek indirect ELISA kit detected the highest antibody levels in the first experiment, while the ID Screen indirect ELISA kit detected the highest antibody levels in the second experiment. Virus-neutralizing antibodies were found in most vaccinated groups, but not in the unvaccinated control group. Tear samples indicated local antibody development peaking at 28 days post-vaccination.
Although the antibody levels in the sera of vaccinated chickens do not always correlate with protection against infection, and the role of local antibodies remains controversial, measuring antibodies by ELISA provides an indication of successful vaccination or field challenge. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of establishing a baseline standard for expected titer values through regular serological monitoring.
应用商用ELISA试剂盒和病毒中和试验检测传染性支气管炎病毒QX株(GI-19)抗体。
本研究评估了4种市售IBV ELISA试剂盒用于检测家禽IBV QX株抗体的适用性。进行了两个试验,一个是实验室条件下SPF蛋鸡试验,另一个是野外条件下肉鸡试验。鸡接种了IBV QX株候选疫苗或现有市售疫苗。接种疫苗后采集血清和泪液样本,并使用各种ELISA和病毒中和试验进行分析。结果:所有ELISA试剂盒均检测到候选疫苗诱导的抗体,抗体水平与现有疫苗诱导的抗体水平相当或更高。BioChek间接ELISA试剂盒在第一次实验中检测到的抗体水平最高,而ID Screen间接ELISA试剂盒在第二次实验中检测到的抗体水平最高。在大多数接种疫苗的组中发现了病毒中和抗体,但在未接种疫苗的对照组中没有发现。泪液样本显示局部抗体在接种疫苗后28天达到峰值。虽然接种疫苗的鸡血清中的抗体水平并不总是与对感染的保护相关,而且局部抗体的作用仍然存在争议,但通过ELISA测量抗体提供了成功接种疫苗或现场攻击的指示。总之,本研究强调了通过定期血清学监测建立预期滴度基线标准的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Virological Methods focuses on original, high quality research papers that describe novel and comprehensively tested methods which enhance human, animal, plant, bacterial or environmental virology and prions research and discovery. The methods may include, but not limited to, the study of: Viral components and morphology- Virus isolation, propagation and development of viral vectors- Viral pathogenesis, oncogenesis, vaccines and antivirals- Virus replication, host-pathogen interactions and responses- Virus transmission, prevention, control and treatment- Viral metagenomics and virome- Virus ecology, adaption and evolution- Applied virology such as nanotechnology- Viral diagnosis with novelty and comprehensive evaluation. We seek articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and laboratory protocols that include comprehensive technical details with statistical confirmations that provide validations against current best practice, international standards or quality assurance programs and which advance knowledge in virology leading to improved medical, veterinary or agricultural practices and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信