Concurrent validity of Theia3D markerless motion capture for detecting sagittal kinematic differences between gait speeds.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2513151
Josh Walker, Aaron Thomas, David E Lunn, Gareth Nicholson, Catherine B Tucker
{"title":"Concurrent validity of Theia3D markerless motion capture for detecting sagittal kinematic differences between gait speeds.","authors":"Josh Walker, Aaron Thomas, David E Lunn, Gareth Nicholson, Catherine B Tucker","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2513151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We do not yet understand the concurrent validity of markerless motion capture (MMC) to measure kinematic differences between multiple gait speeds. This study determined the capacity of Theia3D (Theia Markerless Inc.) MMC to detect sagittal-plane kinematic responses to different gait speeds during walking (3 and 5 km/h) and running (10 and 12 km/h). Fourteen participants ambulated on a motorised treadmill, while marker-based motion capture, through optoelectronic cameras (Oqus 7+, Qualisys AB), and MMC, through videos (Miqus, Qualisys AB) were synchronously collected. Sagittal-plane changes in pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics were compared. Mostly excellent waveform similarity was found for joint kinematic changes (coefficient of multiple determination [CMD] ≥ 0.87), but pelvic tilt was less similar (CMD ≤0.48). Agreement between outcome measures (joint minima and maxima, range of motion) was mostly good-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.475-0.950) with standard error of measurement values of less than 1°. Pelvis kinematics showed lower agreement between systems (ICC = 0.032-0.776). In this study, Theia3D detected changes in hip, knee, and ankle sagittal-plane joint kinematics between speeds with a similar accuracy to the marker-based approach. Therefore, Theia3D is appropriate for use if interested in lower-limb sagittal joint kinematics, but not pelvic tilt.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1560-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2513151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We do not yet understand the concurrent validity of markerless motion capture (MMC) to measure kinematic differences between multiple gait speeds. This study determined the capacity of Theia3D (Theia Markerless Inc.) MMC to detect sagittal-plane kinematic responses to different gait speeds during walking (3 and 5 km/h) and running (10 and 12 km/h). Fourteen participants ambulated on a motorised treadmill, while marker-based motion capture, through optoelectronic cameras (Oqus 7+, Qualisys AB), and MMC, through videos (Miqus, Qualisys AB) were synchronously collected. Sagittal-plane changes in pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics were compared. Mostly excellent waveform similarity was found for joint kinematic changes (coefficient of multiple determination [CMD] ≥ 0.87), but pelvic tilt was less similar (CMD ≤0.48). Agreement between outcome measures (joint minima and maxima, range of motion) was mostly good-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.475-0.950) with standard error of measurement values of less than 1°. Pelvis kinematics showed lower agreement between systems (ICC = 0.032-0.776). In this study, Theia3D detected changes in hip, knee, and ankle sagittal-plane joint kinematics between speeds with a similar accuracy to the marker-based approach. Therefore, Theia3D is appropriate for use if interested in lower-limb sagittal joint kinematics, but not pelvic tilt.

Theia3D无标记运动捕捉检测步态速度之间矢状位运动学差异的并发有效性。
我们还不了解无标记运动捕捉(MMC)测量多种步态速度之间的运动学差异的并发有效性。本研究确定了Theia3D (Theia Markerless Inc.) MMC在步行(3和5公里/小时)和跑步(10和12公里/小时)不同步态速度下检测矢状面运动学响应的能力。14名参与者在电动跑步机上行走,同时通过光电摄像机(Oqus 7+, Qualisys AB)和MMC (Miqus, Qualisys AB)同步收集基于标记的运动捕捉。比较骨盆、髋关节、膝关节和踝关节矢状面运动学变化。关节运动变化的波形相似度大多很好(多重决定系数[CMD]≥0.87),而骨盆倾斜的波形相似度较差(CMD≤0.48)。结果测量值(关节最小值和最大值、活动范围)之间的一致性大多为良至优(类内相关系数[ICC] = 0.475-0.950),测量值的标准误差小于1°。骨盆运动学显示系统之间的一致性较低(ICC = 0.032-0.776)。在这项研究中,Theia3D检测了髋关节、膝关节和踝关节矢状面关节运动学在速度之间的变化,其精度与基于标记的方法相似。因此,如果对下肢矢状关节运动学感兴趣,Theia3D是合适的,但不适合骨盆倾斜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信