Josh Walker, Aaron Thomas, David E Lunn, Gareth Nicholson, Catherine B Tucker
{"title":"Concurrent validity of Theia3D markerless motion capture for detecting sagittal kinematic differences between gait speeds.","authors":"Josh Walker, Aaron Thomas, David E Lunn, Gareth Nicholson, Catherine B Tucker","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2513151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We do not yet understand the concurrent validity of markerless motion capture (MMC) to measure kinematic differences between multiple gait speeds. This study determined the capacity of Theia3D (Theia Markerless Inc.) MMC to detect sagittal-plane kinematic responses to different gait speeds during walking (3 and 5 km/h) and running (10 and 12 km/h). Fourteen participants ambulated on a motorised treadmill, while marker-based motion capture, through optoelectronic cameras (Oqus 7+, Qualisys AB), and MMC, through videos (Miqus, Qualisys AB) were synchronously collected. Sagittal-plane changes in pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics were compared. Mostly excellent waveform similarity was found for joint kinematic changes (coefficient of multiple determination [CMD] ≥ 0.87), but pelvic tilt was less similar (CMD ≤0.48). Agreement between outcome measures (joint minima and maxima, range of motion) was mostly good-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.475-0.950) with standard error of measurement values of less than 1°. Pelvis kinematics showed lower agreement between systems (ICC = 0.032-0.776). In this study, Theia3D detected changes in hip, knee, and ankle sagittal-plane joint kinematics between speeds with a similar accuracy to the marker-based approach. Therefore, Theia3D is appropriate for use if interested in lower-limb sagittal joint kinematics, but not pelvic tilt.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1560-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2513151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We do not yet understand the concurrent validity of markerless motion capture (MMC) to measure kinematic differences between multiple gait speeds. This study determined the capacity of Theia3D (Theia Markerless Inc.) MMC to detect sagittal-plane kinematic responses to different gait speeds during walking (3 and 5 km/h) and running (10 and 12 km/h). Fourteen participants ambulated on a motorised treadmill, while marker-based motion capture, through optoelectronic cameras (Oqus 7+, Qualisys AB), and MMC, through videos (Miqus, Qualisys AB) were synchronously collected. Sagittal-plane changes in pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics were compared. Mostly excellent waveform similarity was found for joint kinematic changes (coefficient of multiple determination [CMD] ≥ 0.87), but pelvic tilt was less similar (CMD ≤0.48). Agreement between outcome measures (joint minima and maxima, range of motion) was mostly good-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.475-0.950) with standard error of measurement values of less than 1°. Pelvis kinematics showed lower agreement between systems (ICC = 0.032-0.776). In this study, Theia3D detected changes in hip, knee, and ankle sagittal-plane joint kinematics between speeds with a similar accuracy to the marker-based approach. Therefore, Theia3D is appropriate for use if interested in lower-limb sagittal joint kinematics, but not pelvic tilt.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.