Explainable machine learning models for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis in tertiary care hospital ICU in low- to middle-income countries.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Saumya Diwan, Vinay Gandhi, Esha Baidya Kayal, Puneet Khanna, Amit Mehndiratta
{"title":"Explainable machine learning models for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis in tertiary care hospital ICU in low- to middle-income countries.","authors":"Saumya Diwan, Vinay Gandhi, Esha Baidya Kayal, Puneet Khanna, Amit Mehndiratta","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00765-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mortality in sepsis patients remains a challenging condition due to its complex nature. It is an even more prevalent health problem in low- and middle-income countries demanding costly treatment and management. This study proposes an explainable artificial intelligence-based approach towards mortality prediction for patients with sepsis admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 500 patients (N = 500, male: female = 262:238, age = 45.96 ± 20.92 years) with sepsis were analyzed retrospectively. We utilize SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to gain insights into the preliminary model's learnings regarding the wide array of demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory features. The clinical insights were used for feature selection to fetch the top t = 80% feature spread as well as to derive empirical findings from feature dependence plots which could find application in periphery hospital settings. Four machine learning algorithms, Random Forest, XGBoost, Extra Trees and Gradient Boosting classifiers were trained for the binary classification task (discharge from ICU and death in ICU) with the selected influential feature set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Extra Trees Classifier showed the best overall performance with AUROC score: 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.93), Accuracy: 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.86), F1 score: 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.86), Precision: 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) and Recall: 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.82). All four models perform significantly well on dataset with AUROC scores ranging from 0.81 (CI 0.73-0.89) to 0.87 (CI 0.80-0.93) and F1 scores ranging 0.74 (CI 0.64-0.83) to 0.78 (CI 0.69-0.86) on the hold-out test set and were stable over fivefold cross-validation prior to testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed approach could provide preemptive estimations into prognostication and outcome prediction of patients with sepsis in low-resource settings. This will aid in clinical decision-making, resource allocation and research for new treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00765-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mortality in sepsis patients remains a challenging condition due to its complex nature. It is an even more prevalent health problem in low- and middle-income countries demanding costly treatment and management. This study proposes an explainable artificial intelligence-based approach towards mortality prediction for patients with sepsis admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: A total of 500 patients (N = 500, male: female = 262:238, age = 45.96 ± 20.92 years) with sepsis were analyzed retrospectively. We utilize SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to gain insights into the preliminary model's learnings regarding the wide array of demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory features. The clinical insights were used for feature selection to fetch the top t = 80% feature spread as well as to derive empirical findings from feature dependence plots which could find application in periphery hospital settings. Four machine learning algorithms, Random Forest, XGBoost, Extra Trees and Gradient Boosting classifiers were trained for the binary classification task (discharge from ICU and death in ICU) with the selected influential feature set.

Results: The Extra Trees Classifier showed the best overall performance with AUROC score: 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.93), Accuracy: 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.86), F1 score: 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.86), Precision: 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) and Recall: 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.82). All four models perform significantly well on dataset with AUROC scores ranging from 0.81 (CI 0.73-0.89) to 0.87 (CI 0.80-0.93) and F1 scores ranging 0.74 (CI 0.64-0.83) to 0.78 (CI 0.69-0.86) on the hold-out test set and were stable over fivefold cross-validation prior to testing.

Conclusions: The proposed approach could provide preemptive estimations into prognostication and outcome prediction of patients with sepsis in low-resource settings. This will aid in clinical decision-making, resource allocation and research for new treatment modalities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中低收入国家三级医院ICU败血症患者死亡率预测的可解释机器学习模型
简介:由于脓毒症的复杂性,脓毒症患者的死亡率仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。在低收入和中等收入国家,这是一个更为普遍的健康问题,需要昂贵的治疗和管理费用。本研究提出了一种可解释的基于人工智能的方法来预测重症监护病房(ICU)脓毒症患者的死亡率。方法:回顾性分析500例败血症患者(N = 500,男:女= 262:238,年龄= 45.96±20.92岁)。我们利用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法来深入了解初步模型关于人口统计学、临床、放射学和实验室特征的广泛学习。临床见解用于特征选择,以获取top t = 80%的特征传播,并从特征依赖图中得出可以在外围医院环境中应用的实证结果。随机森林(Random Forest)、XGBoost、Extra Trees和Gradient Boosting四种机器学习算法根据所选择的有影响的特征集对二元分类任务(ICU出院和ICU死亡)进行训练。结果:Extra Trees分类器的AUROC评分为0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.93),准确率为0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.86), F1评分为0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.86),精密度为0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.98),召回率为0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.82)。所有四种模型在数据集上的表现都很好,AUROC评分范围为0.81 (CI 0.73-0.89)至0.87 (CI 0.80-0.93), F1评分范围为0.74 (CI 0.64-0.83)至0.78 (CI 0.69-0.86),并且在测试前的五次交叉验证中稳定。结论:所提出的方法可以为低资源环境下脓毒症患者的预后和结局预测提供先发制人的估计。这将有助于临床决策,资源分配和研究新的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信