Hesitancy or Straining, That Is the Question: Which Does Question 6 of the International Prostate Symptom Score Represent?

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Noritoshi Sekido, Kenji Omae, Nobuhiro Haga, Yasue Kubota, Motoaki Saito, Ryuji Sakakibara, Mikako Yoshida, Takahiko Mitsui, Naoya Masumori, Satoru Takahashi
{"title":"Hesitancy or Straining, That Is the Question: Which Does Question 6 of the International Prostate Symptom Score Represent?","authors":"Noritoshi Sekido, Kenji Omae, Nobuhiro Haga, Yasue Kubota, Motoaki Saito, Ryuji Sakakibara, Mikako Yoshida, Takahiko Mitsui, Naoya Masumori, Satoru Takahashi","doi":"10.1111/iju.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the agreement between initial straining, a proxy for Question 6 of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS Q6), and three voiding symptoms (hesitancy, straining during voiding, and terminal straining).</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Data from a nationwide survey of lower urinary tract symptoms in adults conducted by the Japanese Continence Society were analyzed. The agreement was evaluated by the weighted kappa coefficient. In addition, the correlation between these four voiding symptoms and other voiding symptoms (slow stream, intermittency, and terminal dribbling) was evaluated by Spearman's rank correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3122 male and 3088 female participants were included in the analysis. In both male and female groups, substantial agreement on initial straining was observed for hesitancy (kappa, 0.625 and 0.639, respectively) as well as straining during voiding (kappa, 0.790 and 0.801, respectively). Initial straining correlated moderately with other voiding symptoms (rs, 0.442 to 0.597), while hesitancy was moderately correlated with other voiding symptoms (rs, 0.461 to 0.638). Straining during voiding was moderately correlated with intermittency (rs, 0.591 to 0.617).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IPSS Q6 should not be used lightly as either a hesitancy or straining score because it substantially represents both hesitancy and straining during voiding.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the agreement between initial straining, a proxy for Question 6 of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS Q6), and three voiding symptoms (hesitancy, straining during voiding, and terminal straining).

Participants and methods: Data from a nationwide survey of lower urinary tract symptoms in adults conducted by the Japanese Continence Society were analyzed. The agreement was evaluated by the weighted kappa coefficient. In addition, the correlation between these four voiding symptoms and other voiding symptoms (slow stream, intermittency, and terminal dribbling) was evaluated by Spearman's rank correlation.

Results: Overall, 3122 male and 3088 female participants were included in the analysis. In both male and female groups, substantial agreement on initial straining was observed for hesitancy (kappa, 0.625 and 0.639, respectively) as well as straining during voiding (kappa, 0.790 and 0.801, respectively). Initial straining correlated moderately with other voiding symptoms (rs, 0.442 to 0.597), while hesitancy was moderately correlated with other voiding symptoms (rs, 0.461 to 0.638). Straining during voiding was moderately correlated with intermittency (rs, 0.591 to 0.617).

Conclusion: The IPSS Q6 should not be used lightly as either a hesitancy or straining score because it substantially represents both hesitancy and straining during voiding.

犹豫还是紧张,这是一个问题:国际前列腺症状评分问题6代表什么?
目的:评估初始紧张(国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS Q6)问题6的替代方法)与三种排尿症状(排尿犹豫、排尿时紧张和终末紧张)之间的一致性。参与者和方法:对日本自制学会开展的一项关于成人下尿路症状的全国性调查数据进行了分析。采用加权kappa系数对一致性进行评价。此外,采用Spearman秩相关法评价这四种排尿症状与其他排尿症状(慢流、间歇、终末运球)的相关性。结果:总共有3122名男性和3088名女性被纳入分析。在男性和女性组中,在犹豫(kappa分别为0.625和0.639)和排尿时的紧张(kappa分别为0.790和0.801)上观察到的初始紧张程度基本一致。初始紧张与其他排尿症状中度相关(rs, 0.442 ~ 0.597),犹豫与其他排尿症状中度相关(rs, 0.461 ~ 0.638)。排尿时紧张与间歇有中度相关性(rs, 0.591 ~ 0.617)。结论:IPSS Q6不应轻率地用作犹豫或紧张评分,因为它实质上代表了排尿过程中的犹豫和紧张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信