The effect of sulforaphane on autism spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.9 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
EXCLI Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17179/excli2025-8239
Rui Wang, Zhenhui Ren, Yamin Li
{"title":"The effect of sulforaphane on autism spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rui Wang, Zhenhui Ren, Yamin Li","doi":"10.17179/excli2025-8239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder lacking effective treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of sulforaphane (SFN) for ASD. Eight databases were searched from inception to September 2024, identifying six randomized controlled trials for inclusion. Efficacy outcomes included ASD symptoms measured by the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), while safety outcomes included adverse events measured by relative risk. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated via the Grade of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results showed that SFN significantly improved total symptoms (SMD = -0.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI), -0.42, -0.12), aberrant behavior (SMD = -0.43, 95 % CI, -0.66, -0.19), hyperactivity (SMD = -0.58, 95 % CI, -1.03, -0.13), social interaction (SMD = -0.43, 95 % CI, -0.59, -0.27), social communication (SMD = -0.24, 95 % CI, -0.35, - 0.12), and restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB) (SMD = -0.16, 95 % CI, -0.31, -0.00). Effects on irritability, anxiety, sensory sensitivity, total social skills, social awareness, social cognition, and social motivation were not statistically significant. Adverse events were similar between intervention and control groups. In conclusion, SFN shows potential in improving ASD symptoms without significant adverse effects. However, results should be interpreted cautiously due to potential influences from assessment tools, outcome assessors, and treatment duration. Further research is needed to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of SFN for ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12247,"journal":{"name":"EXCLI Journal","volume":"24 ","pages":"542-557"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12127520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXCLI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2025-8239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder lacking effective treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of sulforaphane (SFN) for ASD. Eight databases were searched from inception to September 2024, identifying six randomized controlled trials for inclusion. Efficacy outcomes included ASD symptoms measured by the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), while safety outcomes included adverse events measured by relative risk. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated via the Grade of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results showed that SFN significantly improved total symptoms (SMD = -0.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI), -0.42, -0.12), aberrant behavior (SMD = -0.43, 95 % CI, -0.66, -0.19), hyperactivity (SMD = -0.58, 95 % CI, -1.03, -0.13), social interaction (SMD = -0.43, 95 % CI, -0.59, -0.27), social communication (SMD = -0.24, 95 % CI, -0.35, - 0.12), and restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB) (SMD = -0.16, 95 % CI, -0.31, -0.00). Effects on irritability, anxiety, sensory sensitivity, total social skills, social awareness, social cognition, and social motivation were not statistically significant. Adverse events were similar between intervention and control groups. In conclusion, SFN shows potential in improving ASD symptoms without significant adverse effects. However, results should be interpreted cautiously due to potential influences from assessment tools, outcome assessors, and treatment duration. Further research is needed to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of SFN for ASD.

萝卜硫素对自闭症谱系障碍的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种复杂的神经发育障碍,缺乏有效的治疗。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了萝卜硫素(SFN)治疗ASD的有效性和安全性。从建立到2024年9月检索了8个数据库,确定了6个随机对照试验纳入。疗效结果包括通过平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD)测量的ASD症状,而安全性结果包括通过相对风险测量的不良事件。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险,并通过推荐评估、发展和评价等级(Grade)评估证据确定性。结果显示,SFN显著改善了总症状(SMD = -0.27, 95%可信区间(CI), -0.42, -0.12)、异常行为(SMD = -0.43, 95% CI, -0.66, -0.19)、多动(SMD = -0.58, 95% CI, -1.03, -0.13)、社交互动(SMD = -0.43, 95% CI, -0.59, -0.27)、社交交流(SMD = -0.24, 95% CI, -0.35, -0.12)、受限和重复行为(RRB) (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI, -0.31, -0.00)。对易怒、焦虑、感觉敏感性、总社交技能、社会意识、社会认知和社会动机的影响无统计学意义。干预组和对照组的不良事件相似。总之,SFN在改善ASD症状方面具有潜力,且没有明显的不良反应。然而,由于评估工具、结果评估者和治疗时间的潜在影响,结果应谨慎解释。SFN治疗ASD的长期疗效和安全性有待进一步研究证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EXCLI Journal
EXCLI Journal BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: EXCLI Journal publishes original research reports, authoritative reviews and case reports of experimental and clinical sciences. The journal is particularly keen to keep a broad view of science and technology, and therefore welcomes papers which bridge disciplines and may not suit the narrow specialism of other journals. Although the general emphasis is on biological sciences, studies from the following fields are explicitly encouraged (alphabetical order): aging research, behavioral sciences, biochemistry, cell biology, chemistry including analytical chemistry, clinical and preclinical studies, drug development, environmental health, ergonomics, forensic medicine, genetics, hepatology and gastroenterology, immunology, neurosciences, occupational medicine, oncology and cancer research, pharmacology, proteomics, psychiatric research, psychology, systems biology, toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信